Experiences in Existing Places at Sweden Focusing on Outdoor Activities in Line with Environmental Contact in Landscape Spaces
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ijrud.v3i1.8051Keywords:
Built Environment, Green Spaces, Outdoor Physical Activity, Public Health, Urban Landscape DesignAbstract
This paper investigates the influence and effect of the outdoor activity reflection surroundings on physical activity. How landscape design in urban settings can be effectively utilized to promote healthier lifestyles. For example, Malmo city grows and urban living becomes more sedentary and inactive there the need for accessible. The well-designed outdoor spaces become increasingly important activity in Malmo city. The Malmo city study focuses on how integrating the natural elements into the built environment. such as parks, green spaces, sidewalks, city squares and recreational facilities. It can support daily physical activity including walking, jogging and various social or leisure activities. The paper highlights that environmental design can reduce barriers to participation in physical activity across different age groups and social backgrounds. The Outdoor spaces encourage not only physical movement but also social interaction stress relief and mental well-being. A clean natural and accessible environment can play a significant role in motivating individuals to step outside, especially for those with inactive Malmo city routines working. The findings both observational insights and existing literature the study emphasizes the importance of public access to well-maintained outdoor activity at public spaces. How these spaces contribute to a community’s overall health focusing with contact landscape features. Like this, safety greenery and functional design elements that can influence how frequently people engage in outdoor activity. This paper concludes that urban landscape planning should prioritize health-oriented design strategies to support regular physical activity and social connectivity. Thus, as a responsibility, Malmo City can provide an environment that not only improves individual health outcomes but also supports broader public health goals.
References
Cerveny, L. K., Derrien, M. M., & Anna, B. (2020). A research strategy for enhancing sustainable recreation and tourism on public lands. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-991. Portland, OR: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 102 p., 991. https://doi.org/10.2737/PNW-GTR-991
Chapman, D., Nilsson, K., Larsson, A., & Rizzo, A. (2017). Climatic barriers to soft-mobility in winter: Luleå, Sweden as case study. Sustainable cities and society, 35, 574-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.09.003
Chen, H., & Ye, J. H. (2023). The influence of outdoor activities and campus landscape on university students’ subjective well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 15(5), 4157. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054157
Cohen, S., & Janicki-Deverts, D. (2009). Can we improve our physical health by altering our social networks? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(4), 375-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01141.x
Curran, J. M. (1999). Constraints of pretend play: Explicit and implicit rules. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 14(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568549909594751
De Valck, J., Landuyt, D., Broekx, S., Liekens, I., De Nocker, L., & Vranken, L. (2017). Outdoor recreation in various landscapes: Which site characteristics really matter? Land Use Policy, 65, 186-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.009
Durstine, J. L., Gordon, B., Wang, Z., & Luo, X. (2013). Chronic disease and the link to physical activity. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 2(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2012.07.009
Dwyer, J. F., McPherson, E. G., Schroeder, H. W., & Rowntree, R. A. (1992). Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture, 18(5), 227-234. Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest
Francis, M. (1987). Urban open spaces. In I. Altman & E. H. Zube (Eds.), Advances in environment, behavior, and design Vol. 1, pp. 71-106. Plenum Press. Urban_Open_Spaces_Francis-libre.pdf
Gehl, J., Kaefer, L. J., & Reigstad, S. (2006). Close encounters with buildings. Urban Design International, 11(1), 29-47. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000162
Giles-Corti, B., Broomhall, M. H., Knuiman, M., Collins, C., Douglas, K., Ng, K., ... & Donovan, R. J. (2005). Increasing walking: How important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2), 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018
Gonzalez, K., Fuentes, J., & Marquez, J. L. (2017). Physical inactivity, sedentary behavior and chronic diseases. Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 38(3), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.2017.38.3.111
Inam, A. (2002). Meaningful urban design: Teleological/catalytic/relevant. Journal of Urban Design, 7(1), 35-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800220129222
Kaplan, L., Kaplan, S., & Brown, T. (1989). Environmental preference: A comparison of four domains of predictors. Environment and Behavior, 21(5), 509-530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916589215001
Larson, L. R., Whiting, J. W., & Green, G. T. (2012). Physical activity in Georgia state parks: A pilot study. In Proceedings of the 2011 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium (pp. 53-57). US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. Physical activity in Georgia state parks: A pilot study
Li, D., Xu, H., Kang, Y., & Steemers, K. (2023). Systematic review: Landscape characteristics correlated with physical activity of the elderly people. Land, 12(3), 605. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030605
Liu, Y., Liang, F., Wang, D., Liu, H., Wang, P., & Shi, J. (2024). Impact of outdoor activities in different landscape environments on the physical and mental health of college students. Journal of Landscape Research, 16(4), 63-69. https://doi.org/10.16785/j.issn.1943-989x.2024.4.015
Norman, G. J., Nutter, S. K., Ryan, S., Sallis, J. F., Calfas, K. J., & Patrick, K. (2006). Community design and access to recreational facilities as correlates of adolescent physical activity and body-mass index. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3(s1), S118-S128. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s118
Othman, N., Mohamed, N., & Ariffin, M. H. (2015). Landscape aesthetic values and visiting performance in natural outdoor environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 202, 330-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.237
Sallis, J. F., Cerin, E., Conway, T. L., Adams, M. A., Frank, L. D., Pratt, M., Salvo, D., Schipperijn, J., Smith, G., Cain, K. L., & Owen, N. (2016). Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: A cross-sectional study. The Lancet, 387(10034), 2207-2217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01284-2
Seeger, C. J. (2008). The role of facilitated volunteered geographic information in the landscape planning and site design process. GeoJournal, 72(3), 199-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-008-9184-2
Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85-125). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_4
Whyte, W. H. (2012). City: Rediscovering the centre. University of Pennsylvania Press. (Original work published 1988) City: Rediscovering the Center - William H. Whyte - Google Books
Young, J. E. (1992). The counter-monument: Memory against itself in Germany today. Critical Inquiry, 18(2), 267-296. https://doi.org/10.1086/448632
Zhang, W., & Lawson, G. (2009). Meeting and greeting: Activities in public outdoor spaces outside high-density urban residential communities. Urban Design International, 14(4), 207-214. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2009.19
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Syed Irtaza Ali, Syed Saad Ali, Syed Ahmed Ali Shah, Syed Muneeb Hassan, Mazhar Noushad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
