Performance Evaluation of CAAMS Teff Thresher

Authors

  • Ashebir Tsegaye Oromia Agricultural Research Institute (IQQO), Asella Agricultural Engineering Research Center, P.O.Box 06 Asella, Arsi, Ethiopia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6326-8608
  • Degefa Woyessa Oromia Agricultural Research Institute (IQQO), Asella Agricultural Engineering Research Center, P.O.Box 06 Asella, Arsi, Ethiopia
  • Tamirat Gabiso Oromia Agricultural Research Institute (IQQO), Asella Agricultural Engineering Research Center, P.O.Box 06 Asella, Arsi, Ethiopia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ijpf.v1i1.2113

Keywords:

Teff, Cleaning Efficiency, Threshing Capacity, Threshing Efficiency, Grain loss

Abstract

Teff is the most important indigenous cereal crops of Ethiopia, where it is thought to have originated, despite its versatile merits, teff production processes are dominated by traditional methods. To solve one of its postharvest production problems, the traditional threshing and the resulted losses of quantity and quality, engine powered threshers have been developed by different institutions, including Asella Agricultural Engineering Research Center (AAERC). Nevertheless, as most of the existing machineries are constrained with low output and cleaning problems. An imported CAAMS teff thresher was evaluated and tested with the objective of evaluating its performances. The machine was tested at drum speeds of 800, 1000 and 1200 rpm and feed rates of 6, 8 and 10 kg/min respectively. From the test results, the grand mean of threshing efficiency, cleaning efficiency, threshing capacity, separation loss and fuel consumption of 100%, 97.34%, 2.511%, 111.32 kg/hr, 2.7% and 0.2 lit/hr were obtained, respectively. In addition, the result of statistical analysis showed that, the drum speed have significant effects on cleaning efficiency and separation loss, whereas the feed rate have a significant effects on threshing capacity.

References

America Society of Agricultural Engineers (ASAE). (1998). Standard 40th Edition. St Joseph MI, USA P 132-143.

Bekabil, Fufa, Befikadu B., Rupert S. & Tareke B. (2011).Strengthening the teff value chain in Ethiopia. Retrieved from ATA.GOV website http://www.ata.gov.et/wpcontent/uploads/Tef Diagnostic-Report.pdf.

ENS (Ethiopian Nutrition Survey). (1959). A Report by Interdepartmental Committee on Nutrition for National Defense. ENS, Addis Ababa.

FAO (2007). Agricultural Engineering in Development Post-Harvest Operations. (Threshing and Shelling).http://www.fao.org/docep/19/1/07. Pp23.

FAO. (2018). Food loss analysis: causes and solutions - Case study on the teff value chain in the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. Rome. 48 pp. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

Kepner, R.A., Bainer. R & Barger, E.L.(1987). Principles of Farm Machinery. 3rd Edition. The AVI Publishing Company, Inc., USA.

Manfred, H. 1993. Harvest index versus grain/straw-ratio. Theoretical comments and experimental results on the comparison of variation. Euphotic, 68(1), 27-32.

Melese L., Tariku S. & Selamawit, M. (2017). Evaluation of improved Tef (Eragrostistef L.)Varieties in konso area, Southern Ethiopia. International Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry, 4(11), 32-34,

Seyfu, K., (1997). Teff. Eragrostistef (Zucc.) Trotter. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized crops”. Rome: Institute Plant. Genetics and Crop Research. 12, 35.

Taddesse, E. (1969). Teff (Eragrostistef): The cultivation, usage and some of the known diseases and insect pests, Part1. Debre Zeit Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 60.Alemaya University of Agriculture, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia

Witney, B., (1988). Choosing and using farm machines. Longman

Downloads

Published

2023-10-20

How to Cite

Tsegaye, A., Woyessa, D., & Gabiso, T. (2023). Performance Evaluation of CAAMS Teff Thresher. International Journal of Precision Farming, 1(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.54536/ijpf.v1i1.2113