Development and Performance Evaluation of Tractor Drawn Raised Bed Wheat Row Planter
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ari.v4i1.6333Keywords:
Flap Position, Hopper Fill Levels, Seed DrillAbstract
The purpose of this study was to design, develop, and assess the performance of a prototype seed drill that could simultaneously create ridges and furrows, sow wheat seeds, and apply fertilizer at predefined row spacing. A frame, seed and fertilizer hoppers, a seed and fertilizer metering device, a furrow and ridge former, and a power transmission system make up the developed seed drill machine. Seed and fertilizer rate, row spacing, depth of seed placement, plant count/stand, field capacity, field efficiency, labor cost, and economics of ownership and operation were all taken into consideration when evaluating the performances. Three operating speeds, three flap position levels, three hopper fill levels, and three replications were all included in the fully randomized experimental design. When compared to the germination percentage of the seed recommended by the seed supplier, the investigation test results showed that there was no decrease in the percentage of visible and invisible mechanically damaged seed for any variety. According to wheat agronomic requirements, the seed and fertilizer rates were calibrated at 161.53 kg/ha and 156.70 kg/ha, respectively, for 20 cm row spacing and 5 cm depth. Three flap positions lower, mid, upper, and hopper filling levels of H25, H50, and H75 were used to assess the seed drill. While hopper filling capacity of the seed drill had no significant effect on seed and fertilizer rate at p > 0.05, flap position had a significant effect at p < 0.05. At 6 km/h, the average field capacity, field efficiency, and fuel consumption were 0.61 ha/hr, 84.72%, and 9.76 l/hr, respectively. During the field germination count, 386 plants were found per square meter. The results of the performance evaluation indicate that most farmers can use the developed raised bed seed drill at the upper flap position and half hopper filling level in an efficient and cost-effective manner
References
Anteneh, A., & Asrat, D. (2020). Wheat production and marketing in Ethiopia: Review study. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2020.1778893
Ministry of Water Resources (MoWR). (2005). Ethiopian water resources management policy.
Murray, J. R., Tullberg, J. N., & Basnet, B. B. (2006). Planters and their components. In Planters and their components (pp. 142–154). http://www.grdc.com.au/growers/gc/gc58/notill.htm
Olaoye, J. O., & Bolufawi, S. J. (2001). Design, fabrication and performance of multi-purpose row planting machine. Sustainable Environment, 3(1), 7–20.
Rangapara, D. J. (2014). Development of mini tractor operated picking type pneumatic planter (Unpublished thesis). Agricultural University, Godhra.
Regional Network for Agricultural Machinery (RNAM). (1991). Agricultural machinery design and data handbook (seeders and planters). Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.
Sharma, D. N., & Mukesh, S. (2010). Farm machinery design: Principles and problems (2nd ed.). Jain Brothers.
Singh, S., & Vasta, D. (2007). Development and evaluation of a lightweight power tiller-operated seed drill for hilly regions. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America.
Theodore, B. (1985). Mechanical engineering handbook (pp. 6–16). McGraw-Hill.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2013). Raised-bed planting in Egypt: An affordable technology to rationalize water use and enhance water productivity. Science Impacts, 4.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abulasan Kabaradin, Ashebir Tsegaye, Gosa Bekele, Degefa Woyessa, Wabi Tafa, Abdissa Teshome

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.