Examining the Sex and Modality Differences in Divided Attention Tasks: A Case Study of Students in Bolgatanga Technical University

Authors

  • Elias Ayinbila Apasiya UTAS, Ghana
  • Gabriel Kofi Armah UTAS, Ghana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsts.v5i2.7584

Keywords:

Divided Attention, Multitasking, Memory, Modality, Sex

Abstract

This study looks at gender variations in performance among bolgatanga technical university students as well as the impact of divided attention and task mode on word recall. The study examines how single-task and dual-task situations affect recall across several modalities, drawing on theories of attention and memory. A control group (single-task condition) and two experimental groups (dual-task conditions including auditory and reading tasks) were randomly selected from a sample of 150 level 300 students. The correctly recalled words were counted and used to gauge the participants’ performance on a word recall task. Recall ability under single-task settings was considerably higher than under dual-task conditions, according to one-way anova results, indicating the harmful impact of divided attention on memory encoding. Additionally, modality variations were noted, indicating different cognitive load across modalities, with the reading-based dual task resulting in a larger performance loss than the auditory test. The recall ratings of male participants were rather higher than those of female participants, although these differences were not always statistically significant. The results highlight how multitasking affects memory performance and support ideas of split attention and cognitive stress. The work offers implications for enhancing learning processes in academic contexts and advances our understanding of how gender and modality interact in attention-demanding tasks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Gabriel Kofi Armah, UTAS, Ghana

    Department of Business Computing, Senior Lecturer (Prof), University of Technology and Applied Sciences (UTAS).

References

Bailey, B. P., & Iqbal, S. T. (2008). Understanding changes in mental workload during execution of goal- directed tasks and its application for interruption management. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 14(4), Article 21.

Calderwood, C., Ackerman, P. L., & Conklin, E. M. (2014). What else do college students “do” while studying? An investigation of multitasking. Computers & Education, 75, 19-29.

Colom, R., Martínez-Molina, A., Shih, P. C., & Santacreu, J. (2010). Intelligence, working memory, and multitasking performance. Intelligence, 38(6), 543-551

Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 11(6), 671-684.

Craik, F. I., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125(2), 159.

Craik, F. I., Naveh-Benjamin, M., Ishaik, G., & Anderson, N. D. (2000). Divided attention during encoding and retrieval: Differential control effects?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1744.

Davison, G. C., & Neale, J. M. (1974). Abnormal psychology: An experimental clinical approach. John Wiley & Sons.

Denno, D. (1982). Sex differences in cognition: A review and critique of the longitudinal evidence.

Adolescence, 17(68), 779-778.

Lui, K. F., & Wong, A. C. N. (2012). Does media multitasking always hurt? A positive correlation between multitasking and multisensory integration. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 19(4), 647-653.

Mäntylä, T. (2013). Gender differences in multitasking reflect spatial ability. Psychological science, 24(4), 514- 520.

Murdock Jr, B. B. (1965). Effects of a subsidiary task on short‐term memory. British Journal of Psychology, 56(4), 413-419.

Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychological bulletin, 116(2), 220.

Schaie, K. W., & Hertzog, C. (1983). Fourteen-year cohort-sequential analyses of adult intellectual development. Developmental Psychology, 19(4), 531.

Troyer, A. K., Winocur, G., Craik, F. I., & Moscovitch, M. (1999). Source memory and divided attention: reciprocal costs to primary and secondary tasks. Neuropsychology, 13(4), 467.

Tulving, E., & Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247(4940), 301-306.

Wallace, W. P., Shaffer, T. R., Amberg, M. D., & Silvers, V. L. (2001). Divided attention and prerecognition processing of spoken words and nonwords. Memory & cognition, 29(8), 1102-1110.

Yarmey, A. D. (1993). Adult Age and Gender Differences in Eyewitness Recall in Field Settings 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(23), 1921-1932.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-10

How to Cite

Apasiya, E. A. ., & Armah, G. K. . (2026). Examining the Sex and Modality Differences in Divided Attention Tasks: A Case Study of Students in Bolgatanga Technical University. American Journal of Smart Technology and Solutions, 5(2), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsts.v5i2.7584

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.