Enhancing Access to Justice through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Ghana’s Judicial System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsl.v5i1.7331Keywords:
Access Justice, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Court-Connected ADR, Ghana Judiciary, MediationAbstract
The right to access justice is a fundamental pillar of a democracy governed by the rule of law. In Ghana, however, the judiciary was all too often constrained by case backlogs, high litigation costs and procedural delays, which eroded public confidence. In view of these issues, the judiciary launched in 2005 a programme of court-based alternative dispute resolution (ADR) which was formally incorporated in 2010 by the ADR Act (Law 798). This paper analyses the development, use and impact of alternative dispute resolution in Ghana and, in particular, the role it plays in improving access to justice. The methodology used in the study was a scope-integrated integrative review covering the period 2000-25. These included the Judicial Service’s annual reports, the programme documents, the evaluations of civil society and non-governmental organisations, peer-reviewed literature and media reports. Critical material was screened and analysed thematically to define the design of the programme, its uptake, its results and the obstacles to its effectiveness. The results show that since its establishment, ADR has resolved over 30,000 disputes, with an average resolution rate of around 50 percent of cases submitted to it. The main contributions are to reduce court congestion, litigation costs and to develop reconciliation in family, land and commercial disputes. However, some barriers remain, such as a lack of awareness among citizens, a lack of capacity among mediators, uneven funding, cultural beliefs that settlement is a sign of weakness and unresolved issues of the enforceability of mediated settlements. The review concluded that alternative dispute resolution has become indispensable as a complement to litigation and as a culturally resonant and cost-effective way of obtaining justice. To sustain these gains more mediation training and more robust monitoring and evaluation systems are needed to cement ADR as a sustainable pillar of Ghana’s judicial system.
Downloads
References
Agyeman-Duah, B. (2020). Mediation and access to justice in Ghana: Experiences and perspectives. Institute for Democratic Governance.
Appiagyei-Atua, K. (2013). Alternative Dispute Resolution and its Implications for women’s access to Justice in Africa: A Case Study of Ghana. Frontiers of Legal Research, 1(1), 36-57. https://doi.org/10.3968/j.flr.1929663020130101.117
Brakopowers, A. K. (2023). An evaluation of Ghana’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Act, 2010 (Act 798) thirteen years on (Working paper). SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4529623
Crook, R. C. (2005). Magistrates’ Courts and the Judicial System in Ghana: Strengthening local Justice and ADR. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 37(52), 25-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2005.10756550
Ghana News Agency. (2024a). ADR resolves 36,191 cases in 19 years. https://gna.org.gh
Ghana News Agency. (2024b). Chief Justice declares July 15 to 19 as ADR Week. https://gna.org.gh
Judicial Service of Ghana. (2024). Annual ADR programme report. Judicial Service.
Kasser-Tee, E. (2020). Alternative Dispute Resolution in Ghana: A Cultural and Legal Analysis. African Journal of Dispute Resolution, 7(1), 56-78.
Nolan-Haley, J. (2014). Procedural justice beyond borders: Mediation in Ghana. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1515&context=faculty_scholarship
Republic of Ghana. (2010). Alternative Dispute Resolution Act, 2010 (Act 798). Government Printer.
World Bank. (2020). Justice for all? Evaluating the impact of dispute resolution reforms. World Bank.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Obeng Owusu-Boateng, Justice Agyei Ampofo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.