Levels of Perception on School-Based Management Implementation in San Luis National High School, Philippines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v1i4.516Keywords:
School-Based Management, Implementation, Perception, Dimensions, StandardAbstract
The goal of school-based management (SBM) is to empower school personnel to improve, innovate, and foster ongoing professional development in schools. SBM was developed to make a fundamental change in educational practice. This study aimed to determine and evaluate the levels of perception on school-based management implementation in San Luis National High School, San Luis District-I, Division of Agusan del Sur, Philippines. The study employed and utilized descriptive-correlational survey research design. Furthermore, the questionnaires were sent to the San Luis National High School teachers and the randomly chosen teachers who visited the aforementioned school to serve as study participants. Hence, it reveals that 64.15% (127 out of 198) of respondents are female and 35.85% (71 out of 198) are male. Based on the findings, a moderate descriptive rating for each dimension of school-based management (SBM) implementation is indicated by an overall mean rating of 3.37 and a standard deviation of 0.637. Wherein, all scored higher than the minimum standard: leadership and governance, 3.66±0.729; curriculum and learning, 3.39±0.542; accountability and continuous improvement, 2.98±0.691; and management of resources, 3.43±0.607. Based on how the data was processed, the Pearson correlation is equivalent to 0.541 with a r2 of 0.365. The positive correlation coefficient of determination (r), which is comparable to the significance threshold of p< .05. The perception of school-based management (SBM) implementation among teachers in this regard was determined to be moderate. Additionally, it was discovered that the level of SBM implementation was exceeding the minimum standard.
Downloads
References
Adams, D., & Gamage, D.T. (2008). A Study of Leadership Effectiveness in a Large VET Institution in Australia. International Journal of Educational Management, 22(3), 214- 228.
Allawan, F.D. (2012). School’s Community Partnership Practices and Stakeholders’ Involvement in Digos City Division. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Southern Philippines AgriBusiness and Marine and Aquatic School of Technology, Matti, Digos City.
Bandur, A. (2008). A Study of the Implementation of School-Based Management in Flores Primary Schools in Indonesia. Published Doctoral Dissertation. The University of Newcastle, Australia. Retrieved August 15, 2013, from http://goo.gl/3wiz1n.
Bardhan, P. (2002). Decentralization of Governance and Development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(4), 185–205.
Barrera-Osorio, F., T. Fasih, & Patrinos, H.A. (2009). Decentralized decision-making in school. The theory and evidence on school-based management. Washington, D.C. The World Bank.
Birion, J.C. and DeJose E.G., (2000). Glossary of Statistical Terms for Statisticians, Researchers and Beginners. Quezon City: Rex Book Store, Inc.
Brouwer, P., Brekelmans, M., Nieuwenhuis, L., and Simons, R. J. (2012). Community Development in the School Workplace. International Journal of Educational Management, 26(4). 403-418
Cabardo, J. R. O., (2016). Levels of Participation of the School Stakeholders to the Different School-Initiated Activities and the Implementation of School-Based Management. Journal of Inquiry & Action in Education, 8(1). 81-94
Calmorin, L. and M. Calmorin. (1996). Method of Research and Thesis Writing (2nd ed.). Quezon City: Rex Book Store.
Conley, D. T. (1991). Restructuring Schools: Educators Adapt to a Changing World. Trends & Issues Series, Number 6. A Series of Papers Highlighting Recent Developments in Research and Practice in Educational Management. Publication Sales, ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management, University of Oregon, 1787 Agate Street, Eugene, OR 97403.
Conley, S. (1991). Chapter 6: Review of research on teacher participation in school decision making. Review of research in education, 17(1), 225-266.
Cranston, N.C. (2001). Collaborative Decision-Making and School-Based Management: Challenges, Rhetoric and Reality. Journal of Educational Inquiry, 2(2), 1-24.
Dempster, N. 2000. Guilty or Not: The Impact and Effects of Site-Based Management on Schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(1), 47-62.
Duflo, E., Dupas, P., & Kremer, M. (2007). Peer effects, pupil-teacher ratios, and teacher incentives: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in Kenya.
Garcia, M., & Cerado, E. (2020). Developing an evidence-based evaluation tool for continuous improvement program of the Department of Education. American Journal of Educational Research, 8(7), 502-507
Edge, K. (2000). Decentralization and School-Based Management (SBM).
Eskeland, G. and Filmer, D. (2002). Does Decentralization Improve Learning? Autonomy and Parental Participation in Argentine Schools. The World Bank. Washington D.C.
Fraenkel, J.R. and Wallen, N.E. (1993). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw – Hill Book Company. Philippine Copyright 1994 by National Book Store, Inc.
Gamage, Davide T. and Zajda, J. (2005). Decentralization and School-Based Management: A Comparative Study of Self-governing School Models. International Journal of Educational Practice and Theory, 27(2), 35-58.
Gertler, P., Patrinos, H. and Rubio-Codina, M. (2006). Empowering Parents to Improve Education: Evidence from Rural Mexico. Impact Evaluation Series No. 4, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3935. World Bank Publications.
Goldman, P., Dunlap, D. M., & Conley, D. T. (1993). Facilitative power and nonstandardized solutions to school site restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29(1), 69-92
Gunnarsson, Louise V., Orazem, P., Sanchez, M., and Verdisco, A. (2004). Does School Decentralization Raise Student Outcomes? Theory and Evidence on the Roles of School Autonomy and Community Participation. Iowa Stata University Department of Economics Working Paper Series 04005.
Grauwe, A. (2004). School Based Management (SBM): Does it Improve Quality. Data accessed and retrieved August 13, 2013, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/
Hoy, W.K. & Miskel, C.G. (2008). Educational Administration: Theory, Research and Practice (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Huber, S.G. (2004). School Leadership and Leadership Development: Adjusting Leadership Theories and Development Programs to Values and the Core Purpose of School. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(6), 669-684.
Leroy, R.C. 2002. School-Based Management in Haiti: Committee Members’ Perceptions of Benefits, Disadvantages, Constraints, and Facilitators. Retrieved August 15, 2013, from http://goo.gl/IyjVTU.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
National Institute for Educational Research (1987). Comprehensive Study on Development of Educational Conditions.
Pipho, C. (1986). Kappan special report: States move reform closer to reality. The Phi Delta Kappan, 68(4), K1-K8.
Sanzo, Karen Leigh, Whitney H. Sherman and Jennifer Clayton (2011). Leadership Practices of Successful Middle School Principals. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(1).
Sanzo, Karen L., Steve Myran and Jennifer K. Clayton (2011). Building Bridges Between Knowledge and Practice: A University-School District Leadership Preparation Program Partnership. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(3).
Sawada, Y., & Ragatz, A. B. (2005). Decentralization of education, teacher behavior, and outcomes. Incentives to improve teaching, 255.
Skoufias, E., & Shapiro, J. (2006). Evaluating the impact of Mexico’s quality schools program: the pitfalls of using nonexperimental data. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (pp. 4036).
Simon, H. A. (2012). Administrative behavior. New York: Macmillan.
Stone, J.E., Bruce, G.S. and Hursh, D. (2007). Effective Schools, Common Practices: Twelve Ingredients of Success from Tennessee’s Most Effective Schools. Virginia: Education Consumers Foundation. Retrieved on August 15, 2013, from http://goo.gl/YKtlPU.
Tapayan, H. N., Francisco F. E., Claire., Bentor T. S., (2016). Impact Of School-Based Management Level of Practices Among Secondary School Implementing Units on The K To 12 Program Implementation in Leyte Division, Philippines. International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology, 5(5).
Werf, G., Creemers, B., & Guldemond, H. (2001). Improving Parental Involvement in Primary Education in Indonesia: Implementation, Effects and Costs. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12(4), 447-466.
Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in Organizations (6th Ed). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Zajda, J. (2004). Decentralization and Privatization in Education: The Role of the State in education. International Review of Education, 50(3 & 4), 199-221.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Elisa T. Pepugal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
