Perceptions of Community College Students to Flexible Learning Modality: Inputs for Pedagogical Interventions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v2i5.1759Keywords:
Attitudes, Readiness, Flexible Learning, Level of Engagement, PerceptionsAbstract
A flexible learning modality was implemented to provide relevant and quality education as educational institutions respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, the study examined community college students’ perceptions of a flexible learning modality. The study utilized a non-experimental quantitative research design through a validated survey with 211 students from the selected three community colleges. The data were analyzed using frequency distribution, percentage, weighted mean, ANOVA, and multiple regression. Students’ perceptions towards flexible learning modality with regard to their attitude revealed that students were fairly positive with the learning modality and moderately confident with the set-up of flexible learning. In addition, their level of engagement is noticeably high throughout their learning. Comparing the students’ demographic profiles and perceptions implies no significant differences. The level of engagement and their perceptions of flexible learning concerning readiness showed a negative correlation. However, a positive correlation exists between students’ level of engagement and their attitudes toward the said modality. This suggests that students should receive the appropriate instruction and orientation and be prompted to consider their qualities as flexible learners, as well as their abilities in time management, communication, and technical skills, as these abilities are essential for flexible learning modality.
Downloads
References
Allison, C. B., Laney, J. D., & Member, C. (2018). Teaching Outside the Box: Student and Teacher Perceptions of Flexible Learning Environments Outside the 21st Century Classroom.
Armstrong, D. A. (2011). Students’ perceptions of online learning and instructional tools: A qualitative study of undergraduate students use of online tools. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 222–226.
Aşkin, N. T., & Erzurumlu, K. (2021). Investigation Into Online Learning Readiness of Higher Education Students During Covid-19 Pandemic., 9(3), 24–39.
Ayasrah, S., Alnasraween, M. S., Alshorman, A., & Aljarrah, A. (2022). Attitudes of Teachers and Outstanding Students towards Blended Learning in Light of the Covid-19 Pandemic in Jordan. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 12(1), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.01.26
Baloran, E. T., Hernan, J. T., & Taoy, J. S. (2021). Course Satisfaction and Student Engagement in Online Learning Amid Covid-19 Pandemic: a Structural Equation Model. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1002721
Barrera, K. I. A. N. B., Michael, S., & Norte, A. (2020). Readiness for Flexible Learning amidst COVID-19 Pandemic of Saint Michael College of Caraga, Philippines. 2(June), 1–15.
Berg, G. van den. (2020). Context Matters: Student Experiences of Interaction In Open Distance Learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21 Number:(October), 0–2.
Broodryk, J. (2015). Pedagogies that support Flexible Learning Environments.
Caruso, S. J. (2018). Toward Understanding the Role Of Web 2.0 Technology In Self-Directed Learning And Job Performance. 11(3), 89–98.
Clemen, I. ., Ali, H., Abdulmadid, A.-N., & Jabbar, H. (2021). Education During COVID-19 Era: Readiness of Students in a Less-Economically Developed Country for E-Learning. IMCC Journal of Science, 1(2), 94–101.
Dantas, A. M., & Kemm, R. E. (2008). A blended approach to active Learning in a physiology laboratory-based subject facilitated by an e-learning component. American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education, 32(1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00006.2007
Dembereldorj, Z. (2021). Exploring Online Student Engagement During COVID-19 Pandemic in Mongolia. International Journal of Higher Education, 10(7), 10. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v10n7p10
Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: the Online Student Engagement scale (OSE). (Section II: Faculty Attitudes and Student Engagement)(Report). Online Learning Journal (OLJ), 19(4), 143.
Gordon, N. A. (2016). Flexible Learning in Computer Science. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, 11(11), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i11.575
Hamane, A. C. (2014). Student Engagement in an Online Course and its Impact on Student Success. 206. Retrived from http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/doc/1518130624.html?FMT=ABS
Hart, I. (2000). Learning and the ‘F’ word. Educational Media International, 37(2), 98- 101.
Hartfield, P. (2013). Blended Learning as an Effective Pedagogical Paradigm for Biomedical Science. Higher Learning Research Communications, 3(4), 59. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v3i4.169
Khan, M. A., Vivek, Nabi, M. K., Khojah, M., & Tahir, M. (2021). Students’ perception towards e-learning during Covid-19 pandemic in India: An empirical study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010057
Lalima, D., & Lata Dangwal, K. (2017). Blended Learning: An Innovative Approach. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050116
Li, K. C. (2014). How flexible do students prefer their learning to be? Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 9(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-09-01-2014-b004
Louwrens, N., & Hartnett, M. (2015). Student and teacher perceptions of online student engagement in an online middle school. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 19(1), 27–44.
Martin, F., Stamper, B., & Flowers, C. (2020). Examining student perception of readiness for online learning: Importance and confidence. Online Learning Journal, 24(2), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2053
Milne, T., Skinner, J., & Baird, Kathleen. (2014). Survey results of first and second year New Zealand midwifery students’ level of engagement in a flexible delivery programme. New Zealand College of Midwives Journal, 50, 5–10. https://doi.org/10.12784/nzcomjnl50.2014.1.5-10
Müller, C., & Mildenberger, T. (2021). Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education. Educational Research Review, 34(November 2020), 100394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100394
Müller, C., Stahl, M., Alder, M., & Müller, M. (2018). Learning Effectiveness and Students’ Perceptions in A Flexible Learning Course. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 21(2), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2018-0006
Muthuprasad, T., Aiswarya, S., Aditya, K. S., & Jha, G. K. (2021). Students’ perception and preference for online education in India during COVID -19 pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100101
Naidu, S., & Roberts, K. (2018). Future Proofing Higher Education in the Pacific with Open and Flexible Learning. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3), 280–295.
Nugroho, R. A., Basari, A., Suryaningtyas, V. W., & Cahyono, S. P. (2020, September). University students’ perception of online learning in Covid-19 pandemic: A case study in a translation course. In 2020 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication (iSemantic) (pp. 225-231). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/iSemantic50169.2020.9234251
Pelayo, E. O., & Pelayo, L. O. (2020). Flexible Learning: A New Learning Design in this Time of COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 4(9), 76–79. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt20sep078
Prince, D. E., Dewodo, C., & Atiglah, P. B. (2020). ICT skills, and benefits of teaching and learning animal science with blended Learning at colleges of education in Ghana. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 14(2), 289. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v14i2.14921
Sanpanich, N. (2021). Investigating Factors Affecting Students’ Attitudes toward Hybrid Learning. REFLections, 28(2), 208–227.
Shand, K., & Farrelly, S. G. (2018). The art of blending: Benefits and challenges of a blended course for preservice teachers. Journal of Educators Online, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO2018.15.1.10
Shih, W. L., & Tsai, C. Y. (2017). Students’ perception of a flipped classroom approach to facilitating online project-based learning in marketing research courses. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2884
Van, D. T. H., & Thi, H. H. Q. (2021). Gender discrepancies in online English learning in Vietnam amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. IAFOR Journal of Education, 9(5), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.9.5.01
Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2015). Computers & Education Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course. Computers & Education, 88, 354–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.008
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Al-Yusri S. Aller, Liezl F. Tangonan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
