Sacrificial Cathodic Protection of River Boats in Freshwater: An Investigation on the Effect of Water chemistry and Anode Material

Authors

  • Haider Hadi Jasim Chemical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Basrah University, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajise.v5i3.8516

Keywords:

Aluminum Anode, Cathodic Protection, Corrosion, Magnesium Anode, Sacrificial Anode

Abstract

River boats currently in operation lack adequate protection against corrosion. Historically, iron and steel have been the primary materials employed in boat construction. The cathodic protection techniques for boats involve the use of sacrificial anodes to mitigate hull corrosion. This paper will elucidate the sacrificial cathodic protection of boats operating in fresh water, specifically focusing on those in Basrah’s fresh water. The influence of water composition and the materials used for sacrificial anodes on the efficiency of the river boat protection system has been thoroughly investigated, particularly concerning magnesium and aluminum anodes. The analysis and calculations revealed that for magnesium anodes weighing 2.3 kg, a total of 17 sacrificial anodes are required, distributed over a span of 1.5 m. In contrast, for 2.3 kg aluminum anode, 13 aluminum anodes are necessary, spread over a distance of 2 m. Furthermore, the impact of fresh water pollution directly affects cathodic protection, accelerating the consumption rate of the anodes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Shehadeh, M. & Hassan, I. (2013). Study of sacrificial cathodic protection on marine structures in sea and fresh water in relation to flow conditions, Ships and Offshore Structures, 8(1), 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2011.590694

Wen, C. C., Tsai, H. J., Hsu, S. Y. & Yeh, H. C. (2023). Environmental impact assessment of sacrificial anode method in Taiwan strait, J. of Environmental Protection, 11(8), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2020.118037

Umoru, L. E. & Ige, O. O. (2008). Effects of tin on aluminum–zinc–magnesium alloy as sacrificial anode in seawater, Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering , 7(2), 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2008.72009

Zhang, J., Sun, C., Yu, Z., Cheng, J., Li, W. & Duan, J. (2014). The performance of zinc sacrificial anode in simulating marine fouling environment, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 9(10), 5712– 5721. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1452-3981(23)08200-7

Monzel, J., Alan, P. D., & Maxfiel, M. (2014). Development of new, low-voltage, aluminum, sacrificial anode chemistries, CORROSION 2014, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5006/C2014-4284

Ole, O. K., Vada, E., Waldemar, K., Jan, B., Ivana, J. & Havard, W. (2024). Cathodic protection of aluminum in seawater, Materials and Corrosion, 76(6), 822-832.https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.202314229

Philippe, R., Anne, M. G., Marc, J. & Rene, S. (2022). Cathodic protection of complex carbon steel structures in seawater, Corros. Mater. Degrad., 3(3), 439-453. https://doi.org/10.3390/cmd3030026

Chris, J. (2026). Rectangular magnesium tank anode with single strap, Report of Jennings Anodes, USA Inc., 1-4.https://jenningsanodes.com/product/magnesium-hull-anode-with-cast-in-steel-strap/

Chris, J. (2026). Rectangular aluminum hull anode with single strap Report of Jennings Anodes, USA Inc., 1-4. https://jenningsanodes.com/product/weld-on-aluminum-hull-anode-with-single-strap/

Jari, A. ., Antero, P. & Olof, F. (2006). Cathodic protection of ships in brackish water, J. Solid State Electrochem., 10(9), 681- 688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-006-0111-5

Bakker, J., & Vlaardingen, P. V. (2017).Wetted surface area of recreational boats, RIVM Report No. 2017-0116, 1-68, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, the Netherlands. https://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/2017-0116.html

Wenyuan, H., Mao, L., Lei, L., & Hesong, L. (2024). A new approach for improving the quality of the carbon anode for aluminum electrolysis – An impregnation-baking process, Alexandria Engineering Journal, 96, 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2024.04.004

Xu, L., Xin, Y., Li, M., Zhang, H., Lin, Z., & Li X. (2021). Challenges and solutions of cathodic protection for marine ships, Corrosion Communications, 2, 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corcom.2021.08.003

Sade, J. & Syaifullah, M. P. (2024). Analysis of needs and placement of zinc anode for new ferry ship buildings, Maritime Technology and Society, 3(2), 109-119. https://doi.org/10.62012/mp.v3i2.35389

Bellezze, T., Fratesi, R., & Roventi, G. (2013). Field tests on the cathodic protection of a ship propeller system, La Metallurgia Italiana, 105(6), 31-36. http://www.aimnet.it/allpdf/pdf_pubbli/giu13/Bellezze.pdf

Cruz, R. O., Bohórquez, R. J., Marin, D., Galvan, M. R. (2023). Effect of seawater pH variation on the growth of calcareous deposits and its effect on an impressed current cathodic protection system, J. of So. State El., 27(11), 1-14.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-023-05581-z

Alessandro, B., Luca, M., Francesca, P., Elisabetta, C., Marco, F. & Giampiero, M. (2009). Cathodic protection of carbon steel in natural seawater: Effect of sunlight radiation, Electrochimica Acta, 54(26), 6472-6478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2009.06.022

Downloads

Published

2026-09-19

How to Cite

Jasim, H. H. . (2026). Sacrificial Cathodic Protection of River Boats in Freshwater: An Investigation on the Effect of Water chemistry and Anode Material. American Journal of Innovation in Science and Engineering , 5(3), 14-18. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajise.v5i3.8516

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.