Design of Sacrificial Cathodic Protection System for Crude Oil Pipeline (Part-1 Theoretical Aspects)

Authors

  • Haider Hadi Jassim Chemical engineering department, College of engineering, Basrah University, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajise.v5i1.4538

Keywords:

Cathodic Protection, Current Protection, Magnesium Anode, Sacrificial Anode, Soil Resistance

Abstract

Cathodic protection (CP) is a technology used for controlling corrosion by making a metal surface the cathodic side of an electrochemical cell. This paper discusses the methods for designing sacrificial cathodic protection and applies this method to evaluate two case studies of cathodic protection. In the first case, there is a pipe constructed from API 5L-X70 steel, with a diameter of 1 m and a length of 6 m, extending over a distance of 100 m. In the second case, a pipe made from API 5L-X60 steel has a diameter of 0.50 m and a length of 8 m, extending for a distance of 450 m. The findings indicated that as the diameter, length, and extension of the pipe increase, the required corrosion protection current also rises. Consequently, the number of sacrificial anodes required for cathodic protection and associated costs also increases. Furthermore, the study revealed an inverse relationship between sacrificial electrode current and electrode lifespan; as the electrode current increases, the lifespan of the electrode decreases, necessitating periodic replacement of the electrode.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ameh, E. S., & Sunday, C. I. (2017). Pipelines cathodic protection design methodologies for impressed current and sacrificial anode systems. Nigerian Journal of Technology (NIJOTECH), 36(4), 1072 – 1077.

ASTM G187-23, (2023). Standard test method for measurement of soil resistivity using the two-electrode soil box method, ASTM International Report, USA.

Dai, M., Frank C. Y., Zhen, W., Feng, H., & Qian, H. J. (2023). Understanding pit initiation of pipeline steel X100 under cathodic protection potential fluctuating with various duty cycles, Corrosion Communications, 12, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corcom.2023.02.001

David, E., Daniel T., & Victor, E. O. (1993). DNV-1993 Cathodic Protection Design, Recommended Practice RP, DVN Corporate Headquarter, Oslo, Norway.

Essam, M. S., Mohamed, A. M., Abdel, S. H. & Mostafa, A. G. (2022). Cathodic protection performance improvement of metallic pipelines based on different dc compensation methods, Electric Power Systems Research, 210, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108064

Ezekiel, E. (2015). Introduction to electrical design or cathodic protection systems, Ezekiel Enterprises, LLC, article’s Review, 2015.

Hamed, M. O., Mahdi, A., Ali, K., & Mehdi, E. (2020). Design and analysis of the cathodic protection system of oil and gas pipelines, using distributed equivalent circuit model, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 84, 1-23.

Mainier, F. B., Leta, F. R. & Feliciano, F. F. (2014). Application of anti-corrosive techniques compatible with the environment to engineering education, American Journal of Environmental Engineering, 4, 176-181. https://doi:10.5923/j.ajee.20140406.06

Marshall, P., & Edward, G. P. (1988). Pipeline corrosion and cathodic protection: A Practical Manual for Corrosion Engineers, technicians, and field personnel, 3rd Edition, Publisher by Gulf Pub. Co., USA.

Scott, D. (2015). External corrosion: corrosion modeling for pipeline integrity, Report of Cenosco Croatia D.o.o. Corporation.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-27

How to Cite

Jassim, H. H. . (2026). Design of Sacrificial Cathodic Protection System for Crude Oil Pipeline (Part-1 Theoretical Aspects). American Journal of Innovation in Science and Engineering , 5(1), 70-73. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajise.v5i1.4538

Similar Articles

1-10 of 23

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.