Correlational Analysis on Stem Students’ Ncae Scholastic Aptitude, Track Preference, and Occupational Interest, with SHS Academic Performance

Authors

  • Herman M. Lagon Iloilo College of Fisheries (ISCOF), Brgy. Tiwi, Barotac Nuevo, Iloilo, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v1i4.674

Keywords:

Ncae, SHS Stem, Scholastic Aptitude, Track Preference, Occupational Interest

Abstract

In the “new normal,” a non-paper-and-pencil admission process becomes a challenge. This correlational analysis aims to choose possible admission candidates for SHS STEM strand by determining possible connections between the NCAE General Scholastic Aptitude (GSA), STEM Strand Preference (SSP), and Area of Occupational Interest (AOI), with the academic performance (AP) of STEM students of Ateneo de Iloilo (ADI) Senior High School (SHS). The study covered 124 STEM students data protection protocols. It showed that Ateneans have Proficient (85.6%; SD=3.13) AP and Above Average NCAE GSA (school: 93.95%; national: 37.87%) and SSP rating (90.92%). There is also a significant difference in the GWA if classified according to GSA (p=0.00), SSP (p=0.00), and AOI (p=0.031). There is a strong positive correlation (r=0.646, p=0.00) in the students’ GWA and GSA. The same was likewise observed in students’ Grade 11 performance (except PE) and their corresponding GSA areas: scientific ability, reading comprehension, verbal ability, mathematical ability, and logical reasoning ability. The study suggested that the direct relationship between NCAE and Grade 11 AP validates the efficacy of the NCAE instrument as guide in career/strand advising and in approximating students’ potential AP in Grade 11.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, A. (2016). The effects of Trait-Factor theory based career counseling sessions on the level of career maturity and indecision of high school students. Universal Journal of Education Research 4, (8), 1837-1847.

Benito, N. (2013). National conference on the administration of the NCAE: A report. Retrieved October 15, 2017, from https://slideplayer.com/slide/3823424/

Clark, D. (2016). Think strategically about your career. Retrieved October 14, 2017, from https://hbr.org/2016/12/think-strategically-about-your-career-development.

Department of Education (2014). DepEd Memorandum 78 Series of 2014. National Career Assessment Examination (NCAE) for Grade 9 Students. Retrieved October 14, 2017, from https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/DM_s2014_078.pdf

Department of Education (2016). DepEd Order 55 Series of 2016. Policy guidelines on the national assessment of student learning for the K-to-12 Basic Education program. Retrieved October 14, 2017, from https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/DO_s2016_55-3.pdf

Estonanto, A.J.J. (2017). Acceptability and difficulty of the STEM track implementation Senior High School. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(2), 43-50.

Ferrer, F.P. and Dela Cruz, R.J. (2017). Correlation of STEM Students’ Performance in the National Career. Assessment Examination and Academic Subjects. People: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 532-541.

Germeijs, V. and Verchueren, K. (2006). High school students’ career decision-making process: A longitudinal study of one choice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(2), 189-204.

Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. 3rd Edition, Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa.

Parsons, F. (1909). Choosing a vocation. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Piaget, J. (1977).The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Tang, M. 2009. Examining the application of Holland’s Theory to vocational interests and choices of Chinese college students. Journal of Career Assessment volume 20, (10). Sage Publications.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-05

How to Cite

Lagon, H. M. (2023). Correlational Analysis on Stem Students’ Ncae Scholastic Aptitude, Track Preference, and Occupational Interest, with SHS Academic Performance. American Journal of Education and Technology, 1(4), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v1i4.674