Exploring Students’ Satisfaction in Formative Assessment Tools in Online-Blended Learning Amidst the Covid-19 Pandemic

Authors

  • Diquito Tomas Jr A. University of Mindanao, Digos College, Philippines
  • Salunoy Revelyn G. University of Mindanao, Digos College, Philippines
  • Arcenas Charianne C. University of Mindanao, Digos College, Philippines
  • Salda Cristine Joy P. University of Mindanao, Digos College, Philippines
  • Panerio Conrado Jr University of Mindanao, Digos College, Philippines https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2619-5523

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v2i3.1850

Keywords:

Formative Assessment, Learnings, Exploratory Factor Analysis, Education in Covid-19

Abstract

The global crisis brought on by the Covid-19 outbreak has affected students’ approaches to education. The teaching and learning processes of teachers and students have also changed due to the crisis. Following the Exploratory Mixed Method design, an interview (qualitative) was employed first followed by a survey (quantitative). A total of fifteen (15) participants participated in the interview phase (qualitative), and four hundred twelve (412) respondents participated in the survey phase(quantitative). Content analysis is used in the analysis of qualitative data and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity analyses were used to determine the factor loading of the items. The result showed four (4) factors in the formative assessment tools in online-blended learning. These factors include feedback mechanism, satisfaction, internet and technology availability, and overall challenges. Based on the result of the study, a general recommendation is for future researchers to conduct a confirmatory factor analysis for further exploration and confirmation of the said factors of student satisfaction towards formative assessment tools in the online-blended modality of learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Algharabat, R. (2007). The role of the stimulus-organism-response (sor) model in explaining effects of image interactivity technology (IIT) on consumer responses. In Brunel University Journal, PhD Doctoral Symposium 2007.

Attard, C., & Holmes, K. (2020). An exploration of teacher and student perceptions of blended learning in four secondary mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00359-2

Baleni, Z. G. (2015). Online Formative Assessment in Higher Education: Its Pros and Cons. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(4), 228-236.

Bagheri, F., Merghati Khoei, E., Barati, M., Soltanian, A., Sharma, M., Khadivi, R., Ghaleiha, A., Nahar, V. K., & Moeini, B. (2019). An Exploratory Mixed Method Study for Developing and Psychometric Properties of the Sexual Information, Motivation and Behavioral Skills Scale (SIMBS) in Iranian Couples. Journal of research in health sciences, 19(2), e00447.

Bisht, R. K., Jasola, S., & Bisht, I. P. (2020). Acceptability and challenges of online higher education in the era of COVID-19: a study of students’ perspective. Asian Education and Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-05-2020-0119

Cosi, A., Voltas, N., Lázaro-Cantabrana, J. L., Morales, P., Calvo, M., Molina, S., & Quiroga, M. Á. (2020). Formative assessment at university through digital technology tools. Profesorado, revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, 24(1), 164-183. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v24i1.9314

Demuyakor, J. (2020). Coronavirus (COVID-19) and online learning in higher institutions of education: A survey of the perceptions of Ghanaian international students in China. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 10(3), e202018. https://doi.org./10.29333/ojcmt/8286

Deterding, N. M., & Waters, M. C. (2021). Flexible coding of in-depth interviews: A twenty-first-century approach. Sociological methods & research, 50(2), 708-739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799377

Diez, J. J., Ebro, E. M., Dequito, R. J. C., & Tomas Jr, A. D. (2021). Uncovering learner’s experiences to new normal education: implications of asynchronous instruction in ge 5: Science, technology, and society course teaching. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i10.3937

Dilova, N. G. (2021). Formative assessment of students’knowledge–as a means of improving the quality of education. Scientific reports of Bukhara State University, 5(3), 144-155. https://doi.org/10.52297/2181-1466/2021/5/3/13

Elmahdi, I., Al-Hattami, A., & Fawzi, H. (2018). Using Technology for Formative Assessment to Improve Students’ Learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET, 17(2), 182-188.

Gapasin, L.S., Manongsong, J.B., Tukuran, A.E., Rodriguez, L.C.S., Alquizar, J.C., Manial, N.S., Amba, Z.A., Bolaños, J.G., Mahinay, H.M. (2022). Home-Based Learning Interventions of Science Teachers in the Absence of Laboratory Experiments . American Journal of Education and Technology, 1(2), 95–98. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v1i2.593

Hadi, S., Rahardjanto, A., Budiyanto, M., Krisno, A., & Husamah, H. (2020). Multidimensional Analysis of Environmental Literacy (Sensitivity, Knowledge, Belief, and Behavior of Environment) of Prospective Teachers. Prisma Sains: Jumal Pengkajian llmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v8i2.3281

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective, 7.

Kapasia, N., Paul, P., Roy, A., Das, P., Ghosh, T., & Chouhan, P. (2022). Perceived academic satisfaction level, psychological stress and academic risk among Indian students amidst COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon, e09440.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09440

Keržič D, Alex JK, Pamela Balbontín Alvarado R, Bezerra DdS, Cheraghi M, et al. (2021) Academic student satisfaction and perceived performance in the e-learning environment during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence across ten countries. PLOS ONE, 16(10), e0258807.

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.

Landrum, B., Bannister, J., Garza, G., & Rhame, S. (2021). A class of one: Students’ satisfaction with online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 96(2), 82-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2020.1757592

McCallum, B., Hargreaves, E., & Gipps, C. (2000). Learning: The pupil’s voice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(2), 275-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/713657145

Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. sage publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985772

Njoroge, R., & Kibaru, F. (2012, June). “Implementing Quality E-learning: Which Way for Higher Education Institutions in Kenya?”. In EdMedia + Innovate Learning, pp. 1707-1712. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 2012.

Nunnally, J.C. (1978). An Overview of Psychological Measurement. In: Wolman, B.B. (eds) Clinical Diagnosis of Mental Disorders. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2490-4_4

Owusu-Fordjour, C., Koomson, C. K., & Hanson, D. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 on learning-the perspective of the Ghanaian student. European Journal of Education Studies. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3753586

Peimani, N., & Kamalipour, H. (2021). Online education and the COVID-19 outbreak: A case study of online teaching during lockdown. Education Sciences, 11(2), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020072

Rutakumwa, R., Mugisha, J. O., Bernays, S., Kabunga, E., Tumwekwase, G., Mbonye, M., & Seeley, J. (2020). Conducting in-depth interviews with and without voice recorders: a comparative analysis. Qualitative Research, 20(5), 565-581. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119884806

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional science, 18(2), 119-144. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-10-6

Salama, R., Uzunboylu, H., & El Muti, M. A. (2020). Implementing online questionnaires and surveys by using mobile applications. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v7i2.5016

She L, Ma L, Jan A, Sharif Nia H and Rahmatpour P (2021) Online Learning Satisfaction During COVID-19 Pandemic Among Chinese University Students: The Serial Mediation Model. Front. Psychol. 12, 743936. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.743936

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of educational research, 78(1), 153-189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795

Singh, R., & Soumya, A. (2020). Updated comparative analysis on video conferencing platforms- Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, WebEx Teams, and GoToMeeting. EasyChair: The World for Scientists, 1–9. https://easychair.org/publications/preprint/Fq7T

Suryaman, M., Cahyono, Y., Muliansyah, D., Bustani, O., Suryani, P., Fahlevi, M., & Munthe, A. P. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and home online learning system: Does it affect the quality of pharmacy school learning. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(8), 524-530.

Thomas, L. (2020). Simple Random Sampling | Definition, Steps & Examples.

Xiao, Y. (2017). Formative assessment in a test-dominated context: How test practice can become more productive. Language Assessment Quarterly, 14(4), 295-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2017.1347789

Xie, Q., & Cui, Y. (2021). Preservice teachers’ implementation of formative assessment in English writing class: Mentoring matters. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101019

Downloads

Published

2023-07-30

How to Cite

Diquito, T. J. A., Salunoy, R. G., Arcenas, C. C., Salda, C. J. P., & Panerio, C. J. (2023). Exploring Students’ Satisfaction in Formative Assessment Tools in Online-Blended Learning Amidst the Covid-19 Pandemic . American Journal of Education and Technology, 2(3), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v2i3.1850