Laboratory Performance and Two-Year Field Assessment of the Seed-Feeding Beetle Algarobius Prosopis Against Recruitment of Invasive Prosopis Juliflora in Oman

Authors

  • Samia Juma Biological Control Research Laboratory, Directorate General of Agricultural and Animal, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Water Resources, Sultanate of Oman
  • Mansor ALMalki Biological Control Research Laboratory, Directorate General of Agricultural and Animal, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Water Resources, Sultanate of Oman
  • Bader ALYahmadi Biological Control Research Laboratory, Directorate General of Agricultural and Animal, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Water Resources, Sultanate of Oman
  • Saif ALJabri Biological Control Research Laboratory, Directorate General of Agricultural and Animal, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Water Resources, Sultanate of Oman
  • Ibrahim ALRusheidi Biological Control Research Laboratory, Directorate General of Agricultural and Animal, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Water Resources, Sultanate of Oman
  • Ibrahim ALMeshafri Biological Control Research Laboratory, Directorate General of Agricultural and Animal, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Water Resources, Sultanate of Oman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajec.v5i3.8765

Keywords:

Bruchinae, Host-Range Testing, Integrated Weed Management, Nontarget Risk, Seed Predation, Weed Biological Control

Abstract

Mesquite [Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) DC.] is among the most problematic invasive woody plants in Oman; its prolific seed production drives spread and recruitment. We evaluated the seed-feeding beetle Algarobius prosopis (LeConte) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae) in laboratory experiments and a two-year field comparison in Barka, South Al Batinah Governorate. Across 100 paired mature-pod samples, mean sample mass declined from 133.48 ± 5.15 g before beetle exposure to 67.02 ± 2.60 g after exposure (mean loss 66.46 ± 2.58 g, or 49.79 ± 0.19%; Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P < 0.001). Adult emergence holes averaged 15.81 ± 2.22 per sample but were not associated with mass loss (Spearman ρ = 0.118, P = 0.241). Reproduction succeeded in all four mature-pod cages and in none of four immature-pod cages (Fisher exact test, P = 0.029), and F1 adults emerged in all 90 single-pair containers provisioned with two, four, or eight mature pods, approximately 60 d after exposure. No F1 adults emerged from chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), faba bean (Vicia faba L.), or common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in nine replicated exposures. Following release of 17,360 laboratory-reared adults at four sites, recent mesquite recruitment was not detected at any release site during two years of monitoring, whereas it was present at all three untreated control sites, particularly after rainfall (Fisher exact test, P = 0.029). These results indicate that A. prosopis can be mass-reared on mature mesquite pods and that its release was associated with reduced mesquite recruitment under Omani field conditions. Because the field comparison involved few sites and lacked pre-release seedling counts, and because non-target screening was limited to three crop legumes, the findings should be regarded as preliminary evidence justifying expanded host-range testing, seed-viability assessment, and replicated field trials before A. prosopis is incorporated into integrated mesquite management programs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Coetzer, W., & Hoffmann, J. H. (1997). Establishment of Neltumius arizonensis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) on mesquite (Prosopis species: Mimosaceae) in South Africa. Biological Control, 10, 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1006/bcon.1997.0558

El-Keblawy, A., & Al-Rawai, A. (2007). Impacts of the invasive exotic Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) D.C. on the native flora and soils of the UAE. Plant Ecology, 190, 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9188-2

Hinz, H. L., Winston, R. L., & Schwarzländer, M. (2019). How safe is weed biological control? A global review of direct nontarget attack. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 94, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1086/702340

Hoffmann, J. H., Impson, F. A. C., & Moran, V. C. (1993). Competitive interactions between two bruchid species (Algarobius spp.) introduced into South Africa for biological control of mesquite weeds (Prosopis spp.). Biological Control, 3, 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1006/bcon.1993.1030

Hughes, C. E., Ringelberg, J. J., Lewis, G. P., & Catalano, S. A. (2022). Disintegration of the genus Prosopis L. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade). PhytoKeys, 205, 147–189. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.205.75379

Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54, 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661

Hussain, M. I., Shackleton, R. T., El-Keblawy, A., Trigo Pérez, M. M., & González, L. (2020). Invasive mesquite (Prosopis juliflora), an allergy and health challenge. Plants, 9, Article 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9020141

Impson, F. A. C., Moran, V. C., & Hoffmann, J. H. (1999). A review of the effectiveness of seed-feeding bruchid beetles in the biological control of mesquite, Prosopis species (Fabaceae), in South Africa. In T. Olckers & M. P. Hill (Eds.), Biological control of weeds in South Africa (1990–1998) (African Entomology Memoir No. 1, pp. 81–88). Entomological Society of Southern Africa.

Maron, J. L., & Crone, E. (2006). Herbivory: Effects on plant abundance, distribution and population growth. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273, 2575–2584. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3587

Moran, V. C., Hoffmann, J. H., & Zimmermann, H. G. (1993). Objectives, constraints, and tactics in the biological control of mesquite weeds (Prosopis) in South Africa. Biological Control, 3, 80–83. https://doi.org/10.1006/bcon.1993.1013

Onofri, A., Carbonell, E. A., Piepho, H.-P., Mortimer, A. M., & Cousens, R. D. (2010). Current statistical issues in weed research. Weed Research, 50, 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2009.00758.x

Pasiecznik, N. M., & Felker, P. (2006). Safeguarding valued Old World native prosopis species from biocontrol introductions. Biocontrol News and Information, 27, 3N–4N.

Pasiecznik, N. M., Felker, P., Harris, P. J. C., Harsh, L. N., Cruz, G., Tewari, J. C., Cadoret, K., & Maldonado, L. J. (2001). The Prosopis juliflora*–*Prosopis pallida complex: A monograph. HDRA.

Patzelt, A., Pyšek, P., Pergl, J., & van Kleunen, M. (2022). Alien flora of Oman: Invasion status, taxonomic composition, habitats, origin, and pathways of introduction. Biological Invasions, 24, 955–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-021-02711-4

Ritz, C., Kniss, A. R., & Streibig, J. C. (2015). Research methods in weed science: Statistics. Weed Science, 63(SP1), 166–187. https://doi.org/10.1614/ws-d-13-00159.1

Schaffner, U. (2001). Host range testing of insects for biological weed control: How can it be better interpreted? BioScience, 51, 951–959. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0951:HRTOIF]2.0.CO;2

Schwarzländer, M., Hinz, H. L., Winston, R. L., & Day, M. D. (2018). Biological control of weeds: An analysis of introductions, rates of establishment and estimates of success, worldwide. BioControl, 63, 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-018-9890-8

Shackleton, R. T., Le Maitre, D. C., Pasiecznik, N. M., & Richardson, D. M. (2014). Prosopis: A global assessment of the biogeography, benefits, impacts and management of one of the world’s worst woody invasive plant taxa. AoB Plants, 6, Article plu027. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plu027

Shackleton, R. T., Le Maitre, D. C., & Richardson, D. M. (2015). Stakeholder perceptions and practices regarding Prosopis (mesquite) invasions and management in South Africa. Ambio, 44, 569–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0597-5

Sheppard, A. W., van Klinken, R. D., & Heard, T. A. (2005). Scientific advances in the analysis of direct risks of weed biological control agents to nontarget plants. Biological Control, 35, 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.05.010

van Klinken, R. D., Fichera, G., & Cordo, H. (2003). Targeting biological control across diverse landscapes: The release, establishment, and early success of two insects on mesquite (Prosopis spp.) insects in Australian rangelands. Biological Control, 26, 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1049-9644(02)00107-x

van Klinken, R. D., & White, A. J. (2011). Overcoming seasonally fluctuating resources: Bruchid predation of mesquite (Prosopis) seed in dung. Biological Control, 59, 361–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2011.09.001

van Klinken, R. D., & White, A. J. (2014). The role of pre- and post-dispersal seed predation in determining total seed loss. Basic and Applied Ecology, 15, 581–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2014.08.012

Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., van der Walt, S. J., Brett, M., Wilson, J., Millman, K. J., Mayorov, N., Nelson, A. R. J., Jones, E., Kern, R., Larson, E., . . . SciPy 1.0 Contributors. (2020). SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nature Methods, 17, 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

Wapshere, A. J. (1974). A strategy for evaluating the safety of organisms for biological weed control. Annals of Applied Biology, 77, 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1974.tb06886.x

Zachariades, C., Hoffmann, J. H., & Roberts, A. P. (2011). Biological control of mesquite (Prosopis species) (Fabaceae) in South Africa. African Entomology, 19, 402–415. https://doi.org/10.4001/003.019.0230

Zimmermann, H. G. (1991). Biological control of mesquite, Prosopis spp. (Fabaceae), in South Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 37, 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(91)90145-n

Downloads

Published

2026-10-31

How to Cite

Juma, S. ., ALMalki, M. ., ALYahmadi, B. ., ALJabri, S. ., ALRusheidi, I. ., & ALMeshafri, I. . (2026). Laboratory Performance and Two-Year Field Assessment of the Seed-Feeding Beetle Algarobius Prosopis Against Recruitment of Invasive Prosopis Juliflora in Oman. American Journal of Environment and Climate, 5(3), 72-78. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajec.v5i3.8765

Similar Articles

11-20 of 91

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.