The Relationship Between the Type of Dimensions (3D, 2D) and Mental Interaction (High, Low) in the Augmented Reality Environment and its Effects on Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajcp.v2i1.1075Keywords:
AR Technology, Augmented Reality, Digital World, Qassim University, Virtual RealityAbstract
The research aims to reveal the relationship between the type of dimensions (3D, 2D) and the type of mental interaction (high and low) and its impact on students’ knowledge of the types of wireless networks and their components in the course “Wireless Communications and Mobile Security” based on their satisfaction with this learning, and their academic achievement. The research sample is 144 students in the second year, fourth level of the cybersecurity diploma, and they were divided into four experimental groups. The first experimental group studies with books augmented with three-dimensional models with high mental interaction, and the second experimental group studies with books augmented with three-dimensional models with low mental interaction. The third experimental group is taught with books augmented with two-dimensional models with high mental interaction, and finally, the fourth experimental group is taught with virtual books with two-dimensional models with low mental interaction. The research results that there is an interaction between the type of dimensions in augmented reality books and the mental interaction (high, low) in identifying the types of wireless networks and their components, where the high mental interaction groups excelled, regardless of the type of dimensions (3D, 2D) in the achievement test, and there was clear satisfaction for the students of the groups that study with 3D models compared to the 2D groups.
Downloads
References
Alqifari, A., Alghidani, M., Almazyad, R., Alotaibi, A., Alharbi, W. A., Aljumail, E., Alqefari, G., Alkamees, A., & Alqifari, H. (2021). Burnout in medical undergraduate students in Qassim, Saudi Arabia. Middle East Current Psychiatry, 28(1), 1-6.
Antonoglou, L., Charistos, N., & Sigalas, M. (2011). Design, development and implementation of a technology enhanced hybrid course on molecular symmetry: Students’ outcomes and attitudes. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12(4), 454-468.
Bartosh, A., & Anzalone, P. (2019). Experimental applications of virtual reality in design education.
Chiu, M.-H., & Wu, H.-K. (2009). The roles of multimedia in the teaching and learning of the triplet relationship in chemistry. In Multiple representations in chemical education. Springer, 251-283
Cooper, L. A. (1975). Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes. Cognitive psychology, 7(1), 20-43.
Cooper, L. A. (1976). Demonstration of a mental analog of an external rotation. Perception & Psychophysics, 19(4), 296-302.
Corballis, M. C., & Blackman, A. R. (1990). The effect of apparent movement on mental rotation. Memory & cognition, 18(5), 551-555.
Diegmann, P., Schmidt-Kraepelin, M., Eynden, S., & Basten, D. (2015). Benefits of augmented reality in educational environments-a systematic literature review.
Fernando, S., Reinhardt, D., & Weir, S. (2017). Simulating Self Supporting Structures. Sharing of Computable Knowledge!, 177.
Folk, M. D., & Luce, R. D. (1987). Effects of stimulus complexity on mental rotation rate of polygons. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 13(3), 395.
Halpern, D. F., & Collaer, M. L. (2005). Sex Differences in Visuospatial Abilities: More Than Meets the Eye. Cambridge University Press.
Hussein, L. M. (2017). The Effectiveness of Teaching Educational Research Course on the Development of Scientific Research Skills, Academic and Personal Integrity among Female Students of Al-Qassim University. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 7(5), 392-409.
Iordache, D. D., Pribeanu, C., & Balog, A. (2012). Influence of specific AR capabilities on the learning effectiveness and efficiency. Studies in Informatics and Control, 21(3), 233-240.
Kesim, M., & Ozarslan, Y. (2012). Augmented reality in education: current technologies and the potential for education. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 47, 297-302.
Khan, T., Johnston, K., & Ophoff, J. (2019). The impact of an augmented reality application on learning motivation of students. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2019.
Krüger, J. M., & Bodemer, D. (2020). Different types of interaction with augmented reality learning material. 2020 6th International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN),
Krüger, J. M., Palzer, K., & Bodemer, D. (2022). Learning with augmented reality: Impact of dimensionality and spatial abilities. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100065.
Küçük, S., Yýlmaz, R. M., & Göktaþ, Y. (2014). Augmented reality for learning English: Achievement, attitude and cognitive load levels of students. Education & Science/Egitim ve Bilim, 39(176).
Lowe, R., & Boucheix, J.-M. (2008). Learning from animated diagrams: How are mental models built? International conference on theory and application of diagrams,
Mason, M. (2020). The elements of visitor experience in post-digital museum design. Design Principles and Practices, 14(1), 1-14.
Metzler, J., & Shepard, R. N. (1974). Transformational studies of the internal representation of three-dimensional objects.
Miller, M. R., Jun, H., Herrera, F., Yu Villa, J., Welch, G., & Bailenson, J. N. (2019). Social interaction in augmented reality. PloS one, 14(5), 0216290.
Narayanan, N. H., & Hegarty, M. (2002). Multimedia design for communication of dynamic information. International journal of human-computer studies, 57(4), 279-315.
Phillips, L. M., Norris, S. P., & Macnab, J. S. (2010). The concept of visualization. In Visualization in mathematics, reading and science education (pp. 19-34). Springer.
Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1986). Mental images and their transformations. The MIT Press.
Thwaites, H. (2021). Heritage preservation in the post-digital era: How much information is enough? Virtual Creativity, 11(1), 9-31.
Van Krevelen, D., & Poelman, R. (2010). A survey of augmented reality technologies, applications and limitations. International journal of virtual reality, 9(2), 1-20.
Wu, H. K., & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science education, 88(3), 465-492.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Samy Abdelwahab Safaan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
