Effect of Soil Texture on Agricultural Machine Performance in Sylhet, Bangladesh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajaset.v8i2.2663Keywords:
Combine Harvester, Field Efficiency, Soil Texture, Machine Performance, Soil Physical PropertiesAbstract
Soil texture is one of the primary soil physical properties that largely affects agricultural machine performance. Before implementing an agricultural machine at the farm level, it is important to test the machine to gain an understanding of its technical functionality and economic viability to get the best output from it. The research was carried out to assess how soil texture influences the performance of machinery, aiming to determine the effectiveness of agricultural equipment on a particular type of land. Soil samples were collected from nine different fields, and their textures were determined using hydrometer analysis. To correlate soil textural classes with machine performance, machinery data—effective field capacity, forward speed, and field efficiency—were calculated by operating a combine harvester on the study areas during the harvesting season of Boro rice. Two types of soil were identified: loamy sand and sandy loam. The findings of the study showed that machine efficiency has a positive correlation with sand proportion and a negative correlation with clay and silt fractions. It was observed that soil with loamy sand-type textural classes demonstrated better field efficiency, higher effective field capacity, and higher forward speed compared to sandy loam soil. Small and irregularly shaped fields also caused variation in performance. The study identified significant variation in speed between these two types of soils but no significant effect on effective field capacity or field efficiency at the 5% level of significance. The outcomes of this research will help farmers make informed decisions when selecting appropriate equipment for their agricultural operations.
Downloads
References
ASAE Standards. (2009). Agricultural Machinery Management Data. ASAE D497.4 Science, 85(2210), 350e357.
Belel, M. M., & Dahab, M. H. (1987). Effect Of Soil Condition on A Two–Wheel Drive Tractor Performance Using Three Types of Tillage Implements. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5(2), 1–20.
Bhuiyan, M., Islam, A. S., Kamruzzaman’, M., Alaml, M., & Islama, M. (2020). Opportunity of Local Service Provider on Custom Hiring Business of Combine Harvester for Small Holder Farmer’s in Haor Areas. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347535840
Bouyoucos, G. J. (1927). The Hydrometer as a New Method for the Mechanical Analysis of Soils. Soil Science, 23(5), 343–354.
Bouyoucos, G. J. (1962). Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils 1. Agronomy journal, 54(5), 464-465. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1962.00021962005400050028x
Elsoragaby, S., Yahya, A., Mahadi, M. R., Nawi, N. M., & Mairghany, M. (2019). Comparative Field Performances Between Conventional Combine and Mid-Size Combine in Wetland Rice Cultivation. Heliyon, 5(4), e01427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01427
Gbadamosi, L., & Magaji, A. S. (2003). Field Study on Animal Draft for Farming in Zeguma Village of Niger State. Proceeding of Nigerian Institution of Agricultural Engineers.
Hunt, D. (2013). Farm Power and Machinery Management (10th ed.). Medtech.
Islam, A., Rahman, M., Rahman, A., Islam, M., & Rahman, M. (2016). Techno-Economic Performance Of 4-Row Self-Propelled Mechanical Rice Transplanter at Farmers Field in Bangladesh. Progressive Agriculture, 27(3), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.3329/pa.v27i3.30834
Islam, A. S., Alam, Md. A., Kamruzzaman, M., Bhuiyan, Md. G. K., Islam, Md. M., & Pranto, M. R. B. H. (2021). Business Viability of Small Combine Harvester in Haor Areas. European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 3(3), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejfood.2021.3.3.290
Islam, S., & Habib, M. A. (2020). Performance Evaluation of Yanmar Combine Harvester. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21477.73447
JAWLEKAR, S. B., & Shelare, S. D. (2020). Development and performance analysis of low cost combined harvester for rabi crops. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 22(1), 197-201.
John, O., Ayotamano, B. M., & Folorenso, A. O. (1987). Compaction Characterization of Prominent Agricultural Soils In Borma State Of Nigeria. Transaction of ASAE, 30(6), 1575–1577.
Kepner, R. A., Bainer, R., & Barger, E. L. (1972). Principles of Farm Machinery (2nd ed., 1–11). Avi Pub. Co.
Khakural, B. R., & Sharma, P. P. (1984). Laboratory Manual of Soil Science (Soil Physics, Morphology, Genesis and Classification). Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science Rampur. http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNAAT947.pdf
Noby, M. M., Hasan, M. K., Ali, M. R., Saha, C. K., Alam, M. M., & Hossain, M. M. (2018). Performance Evaluation of Modified Bau Self-Propelled Reaper For Paddy. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University, 16(2), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbau.v16i2.37956
Robinson, A. (2017). Hydrometer Calibration Procedures. https://sciencing.com/hydrometer-calibration-procedures-5501425.html
Shebi, J. G., Oni, K. C., & Braide, F. G. (1988). Comparative Tractive Performance of Three Tractors. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America (AMA), Japan, 19(2), 25–29.
Smith, L. A. (1993). Energy Requirements for Selected Crop Production Implements. Soil and Tillage Research, 25(4), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(93)90028-N
Yohanna, J. K., & Ifem, J. L. C. (2004). Performance Evaluation of Field Efficiencies of Farm Machinery in Nasarawa and Plateau States. Proc. Of the Nigerian Institution of Agricultural Engineers, 26, 88–92.
Zhang, X., Rashid, S., Ahmad, K., & Ahmed, A. (2014). Escalation of Real Wages in Bangladesh: Is it the Beginning of Structural Transformation? World Development, 64, 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.06.015
