On-Station and On-Farm Evaluation of Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) in Sylhet


  • Champak Paul Dept. of Co-operative, Ramgati Upazilla Co-operative Office, Lakshimipur, Bangladesh
  • Hafaza Khandaker Tamanna Dept. of Horticulure, Sylhet Agricultural University, Bangladesh
  • Md. Shahidul Islam Dept. of Horticulure, Sylhet Agricultural University, Bangladesh
  • Jannatul Ferdousi Dept. of Horticulure, Sylhet Agricultural University, Bangladesh
  • Dwipok Deb Nath Dept. of Horticulure, Sylhet Agricultural University, Bangladesh
  • Masuma Zahan Akhi Dept. of Horticulure, Sylhet Agricultural University, Bangladesh
  • Anik Banik Dept. of Plant and Environmental Biotechnology, Sylhet Agricultural University, Bangladesh




Net, Net Polythene, Open Field, Intrepid and Vertimec Application, Yield, BCR


Two experiments were conducted with sweet pepper during the winter season of 2015-2016. One experiment was on-station evaluation of sweet pepper variety ‘California Wonder’ under two different protective structures (Net and Net + polythene), two different miticides application (Intrepid and Vertimec) and Open field (Control) at the Horticulture Research Field of Sylhet Agricultural University, Bangladesh. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. Another experiment was on-farm evaluation of sweet pepper variety ‘BARI Mistimoric-1’ under Net + polythene protective structure in the farmer’s field of Moulvibazar and Sunamganj district. In case of on-station study, Net and Net + polythene protection had significant influence on growth and yield of sweet pepper. The highest and almost similar performance were recorded from Net and Net + polythene in terms of plant height at first harvest (72.67 and 72.83 cm), harvest duration (34.33 and 34.33 days), individual fruit weight (76.45 and 75.95 g), fruit length (8.40 and 8.51 cm) and fruit diameter (7.33 and 7.07 cm). Next to Net and Net + polythene protective structures, individual fruit weight (46.80 g) of Intrepid treated plants was statistically higher than Vertimec and Open field treated plants. The number of fruits per plant (11.57), fruit yield per plant (893.90 g) and fruit yield per decimal (178.78 kg) were significantly higher for Net + polythene protected structure followed by Net protected structure. Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) of Net (5.4) and Net + polythene (5.6) protected structures were measured more than half of the Open field condition (2.5) indicating bright scope of sweet pepper cultivation under protective structures in the Sylhet region. Although BCR of Intrepid treated plants (4.0) was little less than the protective structures, but considering the economic condition of the farmer sweet pepper cultivation in the open field with Intrepid as a miticide can be suggested. In case of on-farm study, the fruit yield per decimal of Moulvibazar district (163.13 kg) was little higher than the Sunamganj district (155.93 kg), therefore, BCR of Moulvibazar district (4.1) was obtained little higher than the Sunamganj district (3.9). The on-farm adaptive trial also revealed that sweet pepper cultivation can be spread to the farmer’s field of the Sylhet region.


Download data is not yet available.


Ahemd, H. A., Al-Faraj, A. A., & Abdel-Ghany, A. M. (2016). Shading greenhouses to improve the microclimate, energy and water saving in hot regions: A review. Scientia Horticulturae, 201, 36-45.

Akter, A. (2015). Production of sweet pepper under protective structure in acidic soil of Sylhet. M. S. Thesis. Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet.

Anonymous. (2008). Annual Report-2008 of Olericulture Division, Horticulture Research center, BARI, Gazipur.

Bhatt, R. M., Rao, N. K. S., & Anand, N. (1999). Response of bell pepper to irradiance-photosynthesis, reproductive attributes and yield. Indian J. Hort., 56(1), 62-66.

Boswell, V. R. (1964). Pepper production. In: Spices, 1(ed). Longman Scientific Technical, John Willy and Sons Inc. New York, 331.

Chandra, P., Sirohi, P. S., Behera, T. K., & Singh, A. K. (2000). Cultivating vegetables in polyhouse. Indian Horticulture, 45(3), 17-17.

Cho, M., Jeon, H., Kim, D., &Yiem, M. (1996). Damage of broad mite, Polyphagotarsonemuslatus (Banks), on pepper growth and yield and its chemical control. Korean Journal of Applied Entomology, 35(4), 326-331.

Halim, G. M. A., & Islam, M. S. (2013). Performance of sweet pepper under protective structure in Gazipur of Bangladesh. International Journal of Environment, 1(1), 1-8.

Islam, M. S., & Halim, G. M. A. (2014). Effect of different tunnel covers on growth and yield of sweet pepper. J. SylhetAgril. Univ, 1(1), 11-14.

Knott, J. E., & Deanon, J. R. (1967). Eggplant, tomato and pepper. Vegetable Production in South East Asia, Laguna, Philippines: University of the Philippines Press, 99-109.

Nadeem, M., Muhammad, F., Anjum, Khan, A.M.R., Saed, M., & Riaz, A (2011). Antioxidant Potential of Bell Pepper (Capsicum annum L.). Pakistan Journal of Food Science, 21(14), 45-51.

Palevsky, E., Soroker, V., Weintraub, P., Mansour, F., Abo-Moch, F., & Gerson, U. (2001). How species-specific is the phoretic relationship between the broad mite, Polyphagotarsonemuslatus (Acari: Tarsonemidae), and its insect hosts. Experimental & applied acarology, 25(3), 217-224.

Paul, T. K. (2009). Technology of sweet pepper production in Bangladesh. PhD Thesis, 225.

Ryiski, I., & Spigelman, M. (1982). Effects of different diurnal temperature combination on fruit set of sweet pepper. Scintia Hort., 17, 359-366.

Saha, S. R., & Salam, M. A. (2004). Modern techniques of sweet pepper cultivation. A booklet published by plant physiology section, HRC, BARI, Gazipur

Saha, S.R. (2001). Heat tolerance in sweet pepper. PhD thesis, BSMRAU, Gazipur.

Sayed, R. (2016). Development of production technology and adaptation of sweet pepper in Sylhet region. M. S. Thesis. Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet.

Shahak, Y. (2006). Photo-selective netting for improved performance of horticultural crops. A review of ornamental and vegetable studies carried out in Israel. In XXVII International Horticultural Congress-IHC2006: International Symposium on Cultivation and Utilization of Asian, 770, 161-168.

Shoemaker, J.S., & Teskey, B.J.E. (1995). Practical Horticulture. John Willy and Sons, Inc. New York. 371.

Singh, A. K., Gupta, M. J., & Shrivastav, R. (2003). Study of spacing, training-pruning and varieties of capsicum under polyhouse condition. Progressive Horticulture, 7, 212-216.

Singh, A. K., Singh, B., & Gupta, R. (2011). Performance of sweet pepper (Capsicum annum) varieties and economics under protected and open field conditions in Uttarakhand. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 81(10), 973-975.

Singh, B., Singh, A. K., &Tomar, B. S. (2010). In Peri-Urban Areas... Protected cultivation technology to bring prosperity. Indian Horticulture, 55(4).

Weintraub, P. G. (2007). Integrated control of pests in tropical and subtropical sweet pepper production. Pest Management Science: formerly Pesticide Science, 63(8), 753-760.

Zhang, Z. Q. (2003). Mites of greenhouses: identification, biology and control. Cabi.




How to Cite

Champak, P., Tamanna, H. K., Shahidul Islam, M., Ferdousi, J., Nath, D. D., Akhi, M. Z., & Banik, A. (2022). On-Station and On-Farm Evaluation of Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) in Sylhet. American Journal of Agricultural Science, Engineering, and Technology, 6(3), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajaset.v6i3.804