In Pursuit of Good Governance and Democracy in Africa: Assessing the Benchmarking Role and Mandate of the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) in Nigeria


  • Mustafa Adedeji Tukur Department of Political Science, Lagos State University, Nigeria


Good Governance, Democracy: Benchmarks, African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM), African Union (AU) and AUDA-NEPAD


The study acknowledged that the post-colonial expectations of the African societies, and the attendant result of good governance, among other values, were not just desirable, but inexorably high, given the experience of the pre-independence era as characterized by colonial imperialism. The study noted that unfortunately, such expectations may have been a mirage after all, not less for inadequate resources needed for development, but for challenges of transition on the one hand; and factors of maladministration, unbridled corruption, gross insensitivities of the post-independent leaders and their ill temperament to governance, recurring regime change by the military, self-rule, and lately, the phenomenon of rising insecurity among other inimical limitations to good governance on the African continent, on the other hand. With the establishment of the African Union (AU), which replaced the legacy Organization of African Unity (OAU) in May 2002 and now rebranded as the African Union Development Agency-New Partnership for Africa’s Development (AUDA-NEPAD), which is conceived as a strategic framework for the socio-economic development of the continent. The AUDA-NEPAD subsequently established the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) as an instrument for monitoring performance in governance among member states. However, the existence of the APRM has generated mixed reactions regarding pursuing its mandate among member-states. This paper sought to critically interrogate the extent to which the APRM has adequately implemented its mandate while benchmarking Nigeria, in the adherence to democratic ethos and values, and the promotion of good governance. This paper has adopted a qualitative research paradigm, relying on secondary data from relevant literature and applying an appropriate theoretical paradigm in its far reaching analysis to underpin the study. The paper concluded by professing prescriptions and perspectives, on how best to place the APRM as a continental regulatory framework for the greater well-being of Africa, particularly Nigeria, while removing the growing contradictions and challenges of governance and development at large.


Ake, C. (2000). The Feasibility of Democracy in Africa. Council for Development of Social Science Research in Africa.

Ake, C. (1996). Democracy and Development in Africa. Washington DC: Brooking Institute.

Akporari, J. (2004). The AU, NEPAD and the Promotion of Good Governance in Africa, Nordic Journal of African Studies., 3(3).

Grimm, S. and Mashele, P. (2006). The African Peer Review Mechanism- How far, so far?, Briefing Paper. German Development Institute.

Gruzd, S. (2009). The African Peer Review Mechanism: Assessing Origins, Institutional Relations and Achievements. Occasional Paper. 29. South African Institute for International Affairs.

Hyden, G. (2019). Democracy in African Governance: Seeing and Doing it

Mattes, R. and Bratton, M. (2003). Learning About Democracy in Africa: Awareness,Performance and Experience. A Conference Paper Delivered on How, People View Democracy: Public Opinion over Democracies, Centre for Democracy, Development and Rule of Law.Institute of International Studies. Stanford University. 22nd July.

Moti, U. G (2009). African Peer Review Mechanism, Nigeria’s Democracy and Good Governance, Journal Of Research In National Development., 7(1). accessed online at -

Oba-Akpowoghaha (2013). Theoretical Approach to the Understanding of African Politics and the Challenges of Development. Global Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(4), 44-52.

Oche, O. (2004). NEPAD: The Challenges of Democracy and Good Governance, NEPAD in the Nigerian Dock.Lagos: Nigerian Institute of International Affairs.

Odion-Akhaine, S. (2010). The Third Wave Democracy Discourse: Is There A Fourth or Fifth Wave? Politics and International Relations Working Paper.Royal Holloway, University of 14.

Oyeshile, O.A. (2019). Democracy, Multi-ethnic Identity and Poverty in Africa. Journal of East-West Thought.

Tukur, M. A. (2022). New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) and the Challenges of Good Governance in Africa: An Appraisal of the Nigeria’s Democratic Journey in the Fourth Republic (1999-Date). American Journal of Arts and Human Science, 1(2), 85–92.

Tukur, M.A. (2011). New Partnership for Africa’s Development and the Challenges of Good Governance in Africa: A Case Study of Nigeria. M.Sc. Dissertation. Department of Political Science, University of Lagos.

Vanguard Newspaper, Nigeria, (2020).Nigeria ready for second peer review process of APRM, Report by Princess Gloria Akobundu, Chief Executive Officer, National Secretariat, Abuja, accessed online at -




How to Cite

Tukur, M. A. (2023). In Pursuit of Good Governance and Democracy in Africa: Assessing the Benchmarking Role and Mandate of the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) in Nigeria. Journal of Political Science and International Relationship, 1(1), 1–9. Retrieved from