Anti-Corruption Institutions without an Anti-Corruption Curve: Assessing Ghana’s Governance Architecture, 2019–2025

Authors

  • Kwesi Botchwey Institute of Development Studies, Africa Research University, Zambia
  • Mabel Korsah Cunninghama Faculty of Law, Queen’s University, Kingston. Ontario, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/jpp.v2i1.6305

Keywords:

Accountability, Anti-Corruption Efforts, Ghana, Governance, Office of The Special Prosecutor, Public Financial Management, Right to Information

Abstract

Ghana has expanded its anti-corruption efforts from 2019 to 2025 in ways that, in theory, should lead to an apparent decrease in corruption levels and an increase in global governance scores. The establishment and operation of the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP), the activation of the Right to Information (RTI) Commission, and repeated audits of payroll and public financial management (PFM). The ongoing presence of the Auditor-General, EOCO, CHRAJ, and Parliament’s Public Committee all suggest a growing network of accountability. However, Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index (CPI) shows Ghana remaining between 42 and 43 points out of 100 for most of this period, dropping to 42 in 2024. Citizen data from Afrobarometer also indicates declining trust in key public institutions. This paper explores this paradox. Through qualitative analysis of official reports, survey data, and secondary literature on African anti-corruption agencies, it argues that Ghana’s issue is not a lack of institutions but a weak capacity to turn investigations, audits, and administrative findings into visible, enforceable outcomes. The paper recommends shifting from creating many institutions to strengthening and consolidating existing ones. It suggests that performance-based funding, RTI–budget integration, and judicial expedited processing of OSP cases are the next steps for Ghana’s governance reform.

References

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown.

Afrobarometer. (2024). Ghanaians want fair elections but mistrust the Electoral Commission. CDD-Ghana.

Centre for Democratic Development. (2024). Public perceptions of corruption and institutional trust in Ghana. CDD-Ghana.

Doig, A., Watt, D., & Williams, R. (2006). Hands-on or hands-off? Anti-corruption agencies in action, or inaction (ODI Policy Brief). Overseas Development Institute.

Fjeldstad, O.-H. (2019). Anti-corruption reforms: Challenges, effects and limits of World Bank support (U4 Issue). Chr. Michelsen Institute.

Ghana Audit Service. (2024). Report of the Auditor-General on the public accounts of Ghana. Ghana Audit Service.

Ghana Ministry of Finance. (2025). Mid-year fiscal policy review of the 2025 budget statement and economic policy. Author.

Johnston, M. (2005). Syndromes of corruption: Wealth, power, and democracy. Cambridge University Press.

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.

Office of the Special Prosecutor. (2025). Half-yearly report: January–June 2025. Office of the Special Prosecutor.

Right to Information Commission. (2025). Monitoring and compliance report, 2024–2025. Right to Information Commission.

Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Transparency International. (2025). Corruption Perceptions Index 2024: Ghana country data. Transparency International.

World Bank. (2024). Worldwide governance indicators. World Bank.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Anti-Corruption Institutions without an Anti-Corruption Curve: Assessing Ghana’s Governance Architecture, 2019–2025. (2025). Journal of Policy and Planning, 2(1), 38-41. https://doi.org/10.54536/jpp.v2i1.6305

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)