The Nigerian Economy and Fuel Subsidy Removal: An Analysis of the Amac of Abuja
Keywords:
Abuja (AMAC), Abuja Municipal Area Council, Corruption, Democratic Government, Fuel Subsidy, Governance, Government Policies, Nigeria, Socioeconomic and National DevelopmentAbstract
Nigeria’s 2023 Fuel Subsidy Removal Policy aims to ensure fiscal sustainability and align with global trends regarding the abolition of fossil fuel subsidies. Reducing socioeconomic disparities caused by inflation, ignoring spending near subsidy thresholds and poor fund management in the transportation, health care and education sectors are some of the challenges of the policy. Social impacts: changes in dominant language, identity, culture, customs, sense of place, major employment, social infrastructure, dominant industries and economic basis. Fuel subsidy withdrawal is expected to lead to socioeconomic implications in Nigeria in 2023 as follows: Over 7 years, the government embezzled $80 million of fuel subsidy funds through corruption and inefficiency in Nigeria’s petroleum importation network. Life as a Nigerian is affected by the elimination of gasoline subsidies in different ways. The positive: Small business operating costs have increased 3x, due to increased consumption and transportation costs. The World Bank calls for an urgent response to overcome financial problems; combat corruption; further promote market-based pricing; and encourage investment. Immediate economic impacts of eliminating fuel subsidies include a sudden increase in fuel prices which affect the cost of transportation and food inflation. Nigeria’s environmental situation will be strongly impacted by the end of fuel subsidies, especially in terms of carbon emissions and mitigation of climate change. It is a sea change that Nigeria has embarked upon. But the sustainability of these renewable resources depends on being balanced in their use and properly managing the grid. The oil industry’s opportunities and challenges will be those associated with the withdrawal of fuel subsidies, including the expansion of domestic refining capacity. Some mitigation techniques include targeted social safety nets, gradually removing subsidies; budget transparency; public communication and education; and measures to accommodate the need for alternative forms of transportation. Individual citizens can play a role in developing energy efficient habits; creating financial plans and budgeting strategies, and choosing alternate modes of transportation.
References
Akor, C. (2017). From subalterns to independent actors? Youth, social media and the fuel subsidy protests of January 2012 in Nigeria. Africa Development, 42(2), 107-127.
Al Jazeera. (2023, May 31). Nigeria fuel subsidy cut: Spiralling costs explained. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/5/31/nigeria-fuel-subsidy-cut-spiralling-costs-all-youneed-toknow
Amadi, S. (2023). Subsidy removal and its discontents. Available at: https://www.premiumtimesng.com/opinion/603719-subsidy-removal-and-its-discontents-bysam-amadi.html. [Accessed 11 August 2023].
Amakom, U. (2013). Subsidy reinvestment and empowerment programme (SURE-P) Intervention in Nigeria: An insight and analysis. https://africaportal.org/publication/subsidy-reinvestment-andempowerment-programme-sure-pintervention-nigeria-insight-and-analysis/
Ansari, V., Salami, H. & Veeman, T. (2014). Distributional consequences of subsidy removal from agricultural and food industry sectors in Iran: A price-based SAM analysis. Journal of Agricultural Science & Technology, 16(1).
Antimiani, A., Costantini, V. & Paglialunga, E. (2023). Fossil fuels subsidy removal and the EU carbon neutrality policy. Energy Economics, 119, 106524.
Apeloko, D. O. & Olajide, O. J. (2012). Chapter eight newspaper coverage of oil subsidy removal remonstration: A thoughtful analysis of 2012 experience in Nigeria. Environmental Conflicts and Peacebuilding in Africa, 125.
Arnott, D., Chadwick, D. R., Wynne-Jones, S. & Jones, D. L. (2021). Vulnerability of British farms to post-brexit subsidy removal, and implications for intensification, extensification and land sparing. Land use policy, 107, 104154.
Aryanpur, V., Ghahremani, M., Mamipour, S., Fattahi, M., Gallachóir, B. Ó., Bazilian, M. D. & Glynn, J. (2022). Ex-post analysis of energy subsidy removal through integrated energy systems modelling. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 158, 112116.
Aune, F. R., Grimsrud, K., Lindholt, L., Rosendahl, K. E. & Storrøsten, H. B. (2017). Oil consumption subsidy removal in OPEC and other Non-OECD countries: Oil market impacts and welfare effects. Energy Economics, 68, 395-409.
Babalola, A. & Salau, T. J. (2020). Petroleum pump price and consumer price index in Nigeria: A case for or against Total subsidy removal–Panel Dynamic Analysis. Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business, 13(2), 107-128.
Babatunde, O. M., Adedoja, O. S., Babatunde, D. E. & Denwigwe, I. H. (2019). Off‐grid hybrid renewable energy system for rural healthcare centres: A case study in Nigeria. Energy Science & Engineering, 7(3), 676-693.
Bazilian, M. & Onyeji, I. (2012). Fossil fuel subsidy removal and inadequate public power supply: Implications for businesses. Energy Policy, 45, 1-5.
Bekhet, H. A. (2016). The effect of energy subsidy removal on energy demand and potential energy savings in Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 189-197.
Bhattacharyya, R. & Ganguly, A. (2017). Cross subsidy removal in electricity pricing in India. Energy policy, 100, 181-190.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3.
Bureau of Statistics Report (2022). Household consumption in the bottom, with 40% of the House hold income distribution account for less than 3% of all fuel purchases: Subsidy Benefitted the Rich only. The Channel News (2023) Cost of transport fare across Nigeria as at 28, July, 2023.
Chiluwa, I. (2015). Occupy Nigeria 2012: A critical analysis of facebook posts in the fuel subsidy removal protests. Revista Clina, 1, 47-69.
Ekong, C. N. & Akpan, U. F. (2014). On energy subsidy reform and sustainable development in Nigeria. International Journal of Management and Sustainability, 3(4), 186-202.
Faruk, L. (2011). Remarks by Chairman, House Adhoc Committee on fuel subsidy. In the Vanguard Newspaper, 24 March, 2011. Federal Government of Nigeria (2011). Appropriation Act. Abuja. Federal Government Printer.
Federal Government of Nigeria (2022). Appropriation Act. Abuja. Federal Government Printer.
Federal Government of Nigeria (2023). Appropriation Act. Abuja. Federal Government Printer.
Feng, K., Hubacek, K., Liu, Y., Marchán, E. & Vogt-Schilb, A. (2018). Managing the distributional effects of energy taxes and subsidy removal in Latin America and the Caribbean. Applied Energy, 225, 424-436.
Garba, S. (2023). Press statement by Buhari Media Aide that: Buhari withold fuel subsidy removal to enable APC win presidential election. 3 July, 2023.
Greve, H. & Lay, J. (2023). Stepping down the ladder: The impacts of fossil fuel subsidy removal in a developing country. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 10(1), 121-158.
Harring, N., Jönsson, E., Matti, S., Mundaca, G. & Jagers, S. C. (2023a). Public acceptance of fossil fuel subsidy removal can be reinforced with revenue recycling. Nature Climate Change, 13(3), 214-215.
Harring, N., Jönsson, E., Matti, S., Mundaca, G. & Jagers, S. C. (2023b). Cross-national analysis of attitudes towards fossil fuel subsidy removal. Nature Climate Change, 13(3), 244-249.
Harun, M., Mat, S. H. C., Fadzim, W. R., Khan, S. J. M. & Noor, M. S. Z. (2018). The effects of fuel subsidy removal on input costs of productions: Leontief input-output price model. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 7(5), 529-534.
Heger, M., Wheeler, D., Zens, G. & Meisner, C. (2019). Motor vehicle density and air pollution in Greater Cairo: fuel subsidy removal and metro line extension and their effect on congestion and pollution. World Bank.
Houseland, C. (2020). Contentious and institutional politics in a petro-state: Nigeria’s 2012 fuel subsidy protests. The Extractive Industries and Society, 7(4), 1230-1237.
House of Representatives Adhoc Committee Report on Fuel Subsidy (2022). House of Representatives Adhoc Committee Report on amount Expended on Fuel Subsidy between 2017 and 2021 in Nigeria (2022).
Husaini, D. H., Puah, C. H. & Lean, H. H. (2019). Energy subsidy and oil price fluctuation, and price behaviour in Malaysia: A time series analysis. Energy, 171, 1000-1008.
Iheukwumere, O. E., Moore, D. & Omotayo, T. (2020). Investigating the challenges of refinery construction in Nigeria: A snapshot across two-timeframes over the past 55 years. International journal of construction supply chain management, 10(1), 46-72.
Ikenga, A. F. & Oluka, N. L. (2023). An examination of the benefits and challenges of the fuel subsidy removal on the Nigerian economy in the fourth republic. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 5(6), 128-142. International Monetary Fund (2022). Press Statement issued at the end of its Article IV Consultation meeting with Nigeria in 2022: Director (IMF) urged Nigeria to remove untargeted fuel subsidies.
Itsekor, L. U. (2020). A need for investment in Nigerian crude oil refining and infrastructures: a panacea to refined petroleum shortages and economic growth. In Energy in Transition, 7th IAEE Asian Conference. International Association for Energy Economics.
Jewell, J., McCollum, D., Emmerling, J., Bertram, C., Gernaat, D. E., Krey, V., ... & Riahi, K. (2018). Limited emission reductions from fuel subsidy removal except in energy-exporting regions. Nature, 554(7691), 229-233.
Joseph, S., Adadu, Y. A. & Tom, U. A. (2019). Impact of deregulation of the downstream petroleum sector in Nigeria. International Journal of Current Innovations in Advanced Research, 1(9).
Kojima, M. (2016). Fossil fuel subsidy and pricing policies: Recent developing country experience. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (7531).
Kombol, M. A. V. (2014). Uses of social media among selected labour unions in Abuja during Nigeria’s (January 2012) “oil subsidy” removal protests. Studies in Media and Communication, 2(1), 102-114.
Kyari, M. (2022). Daily Consumption of PMS increased to over 103million liter, per day and 58 Million liters were being smuggled. Statement of Managing Director of the NNPC Limited on March 6, 2022.
Kyari, M. (2022). NNPC expended #9.11 billion on maintenance of refineries. In the Punch and Newspaper 2 November, 2022.
Kyari, M. (2023). NNPCL remits N123 billion to FAAC in June, 2023. In Vanguard 1st Newspaper. 21 July, 2023.
Labeaga, J. M., Labandeira, X. & López-Otero, X. (2021). Energy taxation, subsidy removal and poverty in Mexico. Environment and Development Economics, 26(3), 239-260.
Lawal, Y. O. (2014). Subsidy removal or deregulation: Investment challenge in Nigeria’s petroleum industry. American Journal of Social and Management Sciences, 5(1), 1-10.
Majekodunmi, A. (2013). The political economy of fuel subsidy removal in Nigeria. International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research, 2(7), 76-81.
Manjo, Y. G. (2023). Effects of fuel subsidy removal on economy and citizen’s welfare in Nigeria. Lapai International Journal of Politics, 9(1), 203-220. ResearchGate. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377701283
National Economic Summit Group (2022). Amount Spent on Subsidy rose from #1.7 trillion the in 2021 to #3 trillion in 2022. In Vanguard 4 October, 2022.
Nigerian Institute of Social and Economic Research, NISER (2023). Compensation mechanisms for fuel subsidy removal in Nigeria. NRSS Brief, 13th June.
Nwafor, M., Ogujiuba, K. & Asogwa, R. (2006). Does subsidy removal hurt the poor? Evidence from computable general equilibrium analysis. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1444180/doessubsidy-removal-hurt-the-poor-evidencefrom-computable-general-equilibriumanalysis/2075913/
Nwaze, C. (2012). Corruption in Nigeria exposed: With cases, scams, laws and preventive measures. Lagos. Control and Survelliance Associates Prints Limited.
Obasi, V. U., Ezenkwa, E. C., Onwa, D. O. & Nwogbaga, D. M. (2017). The political economy of fuel subsidy removal in Nigeria. African Journal of Politics and Administrative Studies, 9(1).
Olorunfemi, V. (2023). Tinubu removed petrol subsidy to improve Nigeria’s climate change response: VP Shettima. Available at: https://gazettengr.com/tinubu-removed-petrol-subsidy-to-improvenigerias-climate-change-response-vpshettima/#:~:text=Preliminary%20analysis% 20conducted%20by%20the,42%2C800%20tonnes%20of%20carbon%20dioxide. [Accessed 11 August 2023].
Onyishi, A. O., Eme, O. I. & Emeh, I. E. J. (2012). The domestic and international implications of fuel subsidy removal crisis in Nigeria. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 1(6), 57-80.
OPEC (2021). Nigeria and OPEC: 50 years together, in OPEC Bulletin Commentary, June– July, 2023.
Osunmuyiwa, O. & Kalfagianni, A. (2017). The oil climax: Can Nigeria’s fuel subsidy reforms propel energy transitions? Energy Research & Social Science, 27, 96-105.
Ovaga, O. H. & Okechukwu, M. E. (2012). Subsidy in the downstream oil sector and the fate of the masses in Nigeria. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (Kuwait Chapter), 1(6), 15-34.
Prabowo, E., Harianto, H., Juanda, B. & Indrawan, D. (2022). The economic price of liquid petroleum gas, poverty and subsidy removal compensation scenario in Indonesia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 12(5), 169-177.
Rashid, Y., Rashid, A., Warraich, M. A., Sabir, S. S. & Waseem, A. (2019). Case study method: A step-by-step guide for business researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919862424.
Rentschler, J. (2016). Incidence and impact: The regional variation of poverty effects due to fossil fuel subsidy reform. Energy Policy, 96, 491-503.
Rentschler, J. & Bazilian, M. (2017). Policy monitor—Principles for designing effective fossil fuel subsidy reforms. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.
Tinubu, Bola Ahmed (2023). Inaugural Speech of President Bola Tinubu on 29 May, 2023.
Ude, C. (2023). June, the foolish man’s refinery, fuel subsidy and everything in-between. Fuel Subsidy and Everything In-Between (June 10, 2023).
Uji, B. M. (2015). Social media and the mobilization of youths for socio-political participation. New Media and Mass Communication, 42(27), 27-34.
Van Valkengoed, A. M. & Van der Werff, E. (2022). Are subsidies for climate action effective? Two case studies in the Netherlands. Environmental Science & Policy, 127, 137-145.
World Bank Report (2019). Nigeria total revenue in 2000 was $10.8 billion, increased to $67.9 billion in 2010. Government expended over $30 billion on fuel subsidies between 2000 and 2016.
World Bank (2023). Report of World Bank that 7.1 million Nigerians will be thrown into the menacing trap of multidimensional poverty as a result of removal of fuel subsidy. 16 July, 2023.
Zainab, A. (2023). Nigeria consumed 64million litres of petrol daily and expended #18.69billion daily on subsidy, remarks by the Minister of Finance before the House Committee on fuel subsidy between 2017 and 2021. 15 March, 2023 https://doi.org/10/1111/J.1467-8268.2008.00182x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Faleti Olabode, Longe Olumide, Ochala Mark, Godwin, David
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
