Disability-Mediated Offending vs Neurodivergent Offending: Towards Conceptual Clarity in Inclusive Criminal Justice

Authors

  • Kok Hwee Chia Academic Chair & Chief Advisor, Merlion Academy and Managing Principal Therapist, Merlion Paediatric Therapy Clinic, Singapore; Adjunct Professor, Zhejiang A&F University, China https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3645-2602

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ijcj.v2i1.7922

Keywords:

Criminal Justice, Disability Criminology, Disability-Mediated Offending, Juvenile Delinquency, Neurodivergent Offending, Neurodiversity

Abstract

There is an increasing representation of disabled and neurodivergent individuals within criminal justice systems. As a result, it has prompted greater scholarly attention to the relationship between disability, neurodevelopmental differences, and offending behavior. This paper examines and differentiates the emerging concepts of disability-mediated offending (DMO) and neurodivergent offending (NDO), arguing that although the terms are related, they are conceptually distinct and should not be used interchangeably. On the one hand, DMO is conceptualized as a broader framework that recognizes how disability-related vulnerabilities and disabling social contexts may shape pathways into offending. On the other hand, NDO refers more specifically to offending involving individuals with neurodevelopmental differences such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and learning disabilities (LD). Through hypothetical case illustrations, the paper demonstrates how communication difficulties, executive functioning challenges, trauma, exclusion, unmet support needs, emotional dysregulation, and systemic barriers may interact with environmental risk factors in justice involvement. The discussion further highlights the implications of DMO and NDO for juvenile delinquency, particularly the need for early identification, individualized support, diversionary interventions, and disability-responsive juvenile justice practices to reduce long-term criminalization risks among vulnerable youth. In addition, the paper emphasizes the importance of disability-responsive, neuro-affirmative, and trauma-informed criminal justice practices. Greater conceptual clarity may assist researchers, practitioners, and policymakers in developing more nuanced, rights-based, and rehabilitative approaches to assessment, intervention, and justice responses for disabled and neurodivergent populations.

Author Biography

  • Kok Hwee Chia, Academic Chair & Chief Advisor, Merlion Academy and Managing Principal Therapist, Merlion Paediatric Therapy Clinic, Singapore; Adjunct Professor, Zhejiang A&F University, China

    Currently, Dr Chia is the Managing Principal Therapist at the Merlion Pediatric Therapy Clinic, Singapore. He is also the Academic Chair and Chief Advisor to the Merlion Academy, Singapore. He is also serving as an Adjunct Professor at the College of Humanities & Law, Zhejiang Agriculture & Forestry University, China.

References

Chaplin, E., & McCarthy, J. M. (2023). The role of subthreshold neurodevelopmental disorder in offending behavior. In J. M. McCarthy, R. T. Alexander, & E. Chaplin (Eds.), Forensic aspects of neurodevelopmental disorders: A clinician’s guide (pp. 101–111). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108955522.009

Chang, G. (2024). The tug-of-war of emotion in children with AuDHD. Berkeley Scientific Journal, 28(2), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.5070/BS328264287

Chia, K. H. (2026a). From juvenile delinquency (JD) to disability-mediated offending (DMO): A developmental and legal reframing of youth crime. World Journal of Law, 2(1), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18480174

Chia, K. H. (2026b). Disruptive behavior disorders, juvenile delinquency, and disability-mediated offending: A multidisciplinary examination with clinical illustrations. International Journal of Law, Policy, and Social Research, 8(2), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19416522

Clare, I. C. H., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1995). The vulnerability of suspects with intellectual disabilities during police interviews: A review and experimental study of decision-making. Mental Handicap Research, 8(2), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.1995.tb00149.x

Carrington, K., Ball, M., O’Brien, E., & Tauri, J. M. (Eds.). (2013). Crime, justice and social democracy: International perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137008695

Henderson, C. A. F., & Bull, M. (2024). Sentencing and the overrepresentation of people with cognitive disability in the Australian criminal justice system. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 36(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2023.2245592

Hofvander, B., Nilsson, T., Ståhlberg, O., Claesdotter, E., Moberg, P., Ahlbäck, K., & Karlén, M. H. (2023). Autism spectrum disorders in forensic psychiatric investigations: Patterns of comorbidity and criminality. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, Article 1168572. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1168572

Holland, L., Reid, N., & Smirnov, A. (2023). Neurodevelopmental disorders in youth justice: A systematic review of screening, assessment and interventions. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 19(1), 31–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-021-09475-w

Holt, A. (2024). “I’m his safe space”: Mothers’ experiences of physical violence from their neurodivergent children: Gender, conflict and the ethics of care. The British Journal of Criminology, 64(4), 811–826. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azad074

Leotti, S. M., & Slayter, E. (2022). Criminal legal systems and the disability community: An overview. Social Sciences, 11(6), Article 255. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11060255

Ligthart, S., Dore-Horgan, E., & Meynen, G. (2023). The various faces of vulnerability: Offering neuro-interventions to criminal offenders. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 10(1), Article lsad009. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsad009

Macdonald, S. J., & Peacock, D. (2025). Dis/ableist criminology: Beyond ableism through a zemiological framework. Critical Criminology, 33, 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-025-09843-2

Macdonald, S. J., & Peacock, D. (2026). Dis/ableist criminology: Conceptualising the social harms experienced by neurodivergent individuals who have encountered the criminal justice system. The British Journal of Criminology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azag035

Newman-Griffis, D., Swenor, B. K., Valdez, R. S., & Mason, G. (2025). Disability data futures: Achievable imaginaries for AI and disability data justice. In C. El Morr, Y. El-Lahib, & R. da Silveira Gorman (Eds.), Beyond tech fixes (pp. 205–218). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-93022-5_16

Powell, L. (2026). The neurodivergent lens: Surviving and thriving in academia as an AuDHD woman. Autism in Adulthood. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/25739581261421101

Rahmatillah, R. (2025). Criminal liability and ideal procedural legislation for offenders with mental and/or intellectual disabilities: A comparative study between Indonesia and Japan (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Indonesia). https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/58246

Renehan, N. (2024). Foregrounding meaning and motive in the domestic abuse perpetration of and response to neurodivergent men. Deviant Behavior, 45(12), 1682–1697. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2024.2319638

Rogers, C. (2025). Rape and sexual assault: The criminalised disabled sex offender. Deviant Behavior, 46(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2024.2338885

Salter, J., & Blainey, S. (2024). The effectiveness of interventions for offending behaviors in adults with autism spectrum disorders (ASD): A systematic PRISMA review. BMC Psychology, 12, Article 316. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01770-1

Speed, T. (2026). AuDHD as a boundary case of non-stabilizable cognition: On the crisis of categorical models in neurodivergence research [Preprint]. PhilArchive. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19847468

Stubbs, J., Russell, S., Baldry, E., Brown, D., Cunneen, C., & Schwartz, M. (2023). Rethinking community sanctions: Social justice and penal control. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781801176408

Tidball, M. (2024). Disabling criminal justice: The governance of autistic adult defendants in the English criminal justice system. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Wilson, C., Butler, N., Quigg, Z., Moore, D., & Bellis, M. (2024). Relationships between neurodivergence status and adverse childhood experiences, and impacts on health, wellbeing, and criminal justice outcomes: Findings from a regional household survey study in England. BMC Medicine, 22(1), Article 592. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03821-1

Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. The Atlantic Monthly, 249(3), 29–38. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1982/03/broken-windows/304465/

Woodhouse, E., Hollingdale, J., Davies, L., Al-Attar, Z., Young, S., Vinter, L. P., & Allely, C. (2024). Identification and support of autistic individuals within the UK criminal justice system: A practical approach based upon professional consensus with input from lived experience. BMC Medicine, 22, Article 157. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03320-3

Young, S., Goodwin, E. J., Sedgwick, O., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2013). The effectiveness of police custody assessments in identifying suspects with intellectual disabilities and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. BMC Medicine, 11, Article 248. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-248

Downloads

Published

2026-07-13

How to Cite

Chia, K. H. . (2026). Disability-Mediated Offending vs Neurodivergent Offending: Towards Conceptual Clarity in Inclusive Criminal Justice. International Journal of Criminology & Justice, 2(1), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.54536/ijcj.v2i1.7922