A Universal Digital Addressing and Spatial Intelligence Framework for Smart and Resilient Urban Systems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajupsc.v2i1.7731

Keywords:

Digital Address Number (Dan), Digital Addressing System, Geospatial Identification, Smart Cities, Spatial Intelligence

Abstract

Addressing and geolocation systems underpin urban functionality, yet existing frameworks remain constrained by inconsistency, limited precision, and incomplete spatial coverage, particularly across informal settlements, rural regions, and rapidly expanding cities. These deficiencies reduce logistics efficiency, delay emergency response, increase operational costs, and contribute to avoidable greenhouse gas emissions. This study develops and evaluates a unified Digital Address Number (DAN) framework designed to provide precise, scalable, and inclusive building-level identification within a broader spatial intelligence architecture. The framework adopts a hybrid multi-layer system comprising client interfaces, a centralized spatial database, and external geospatial integrations. Each location is assigned a deterministic 12-digit numeric identifier derived from standardized geographic coordinates using geohash-based spatial discretization and cryptographic hashing, ensuring uniqueness, non-reversibility, and scalability. A multi-layer validation mechanism integrating database constraints and proximity-based spatial analysis is implemented to prevent duplication and maintain spatial integrity. The system further incorporates offline identifier generation, deferred synchronization, real-time tracking, and a dual-channel SOS communication framework with intelligent spatial clustering for emergency escalation. Methodologically, the study combines geospatial system design, spatial encoding logic, validation frameworks, and applied operational demonstrations to evaluate system functionality across diverse deployment scenarios. Empirical demonstrations within the University of Jos campus environment and additional application scenarios indicate that DAN achieves sub-meter building-level precision under standard conditions while providing a compact, human- and machine-readable identifier that eliminates the ambiguity associated with descriptive addressing. The framework further demonstrates potential to improve delivery efficiency, strengthen emergency coordination, expand spatial inclusion, and support smart-city interoperability across underserved environments. The study positions DAN as a foundational digital infrastructure capable of supporting logistics optimization, public safety operations, resilient urban governance, and next-generation spatially integrated smart-city systems..

References

Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3–21.

Allen, J., Piecyk, M., and Piotrowska, M. (2018). An analysis of the effect of e-commerce growth on urban freight transport. Transportation Research Procedia, 30, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.09.004

Akanbi, T. A., & Emmanuel, G. A. (2025). Impact of financial technology (FinTech) on accounting efficiency and supply chain performance in Nigeria’s logistics sector. American Journal of Smart Technology and Solutions, 4(2), 63–69.

Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., Ouzounis, G., & Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart cities of the future. European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 481–518.

Bibri, S. E., and Krogstie, J. (2017). Smart sustainable cities of the future. Sustainable Cities and Society, 31, 183–212.

Boysen, N., Fedtke, S., & Schwerdfeger, S. (2021). Last-mile delivery concepts. European Journal of Operational Research, 293(2), 409–428.

Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65–82.

Chen, X., He, Z., Zhang, Y., & Wang, J. (2022). Assessing navigation system routing errors in urban environments. Transportation Research Part C, 137, 103586.

Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221.

Google. (2024). Google Maps Platform Overview. https://developers.google.com/maps

Haklay, M. (2010). How good is volunteered geographical information? Environment and Planning B, 37(4), 682–703.

Kaplan, E. D., & Hegarty, C. J. (2017). Understanding GPS/GNSS: Principles and applications (3rd ed.). Artech House.

Kellerman, A. (2016). Geographic information systems and location-based services. Springer.

Mangiaracina, R., Perego, A., Seghezzi, A., and Tumino, A. (2019). Innovative solutions to increase last-mile delivery efficiency. Sustainability, 11(20), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205474

McKinnon, A. (2018). Decarbonizing logistics: Distributing goods in a low-carbon world. Kogan Page.

Ministry of ICT and National Guidance. (2026). PAPU conference in Uganda targets postal sector modernisation. Government of Uganda. https://ict.go.ug/media/news/papu-conference-in-uganda-targets-postal-sector-modernisation

National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2015). Secure Hash Standard (SHS) (FIPS PUB 180-4). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.FIPS.180-4

Niemeyer, G. (2008). Geohash. http://geohash.org

Pan-African Postal Union. (2026). Communiqué of the 11th Plenipotentiary Conference, Kampala, Uganda.

Saad, M. A. A., & Alsayel, A. (2025). From Vision to System in the Gulf: T-NEVs, Pilot Operations, Unified MaaS, and the Smart Urban Mobility Authority (SUMA). American Journal of Urban Planning and Smart City, 1(1), 40–62

UN-Habitat. (2020). World cities report 2020: The value of sustainable urbanization. UN-Habitat.

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2025). World urbanization prospects 2025. United Nations.

United Nations Development Programme. (2025). Smart cities and urbanisation. https://www.undp.org/policy-centre/singapore/smart-cities-and-urbanisation

United Nations. (2016). New urban agenda. United Nations.

United Nations. (2025a). Sustainable Development Goal 11: Sustainable cities and communities. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal11

Universal Postal Union. (2021). Postal development report 2021. Universal Postal Union.

World Bank. (2018). Street addressing and the management of cities.

Zandbergen, P. A. (2009). Accuracy of iPhone locations. Transactions in GIS, 13(1), 5–25.

Zandbergen, P. A., and Barbeau, S. J. (2011). Positional accuracy of assisted GPS data. Journal of Navigation, 64(3), 381–399.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

How to Cite

Pius, M. ., & Damilare, O. O. . (2026). A Universal Digital Addressing and Spatial Intelligence Framework for Smart and Resilient Urban Systems. American Journal of Urban Planning and Smart City, 2(1), 26-42. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajupsc.v2i1.7731

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.