The Relationship of Adolescents with the Internet and the Void in Educational Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v5i2.6821Keywords:
Digital Gender Segregation, Educational Technology, Family Conflicts, Internet in Education, Teenage EntertainmentAbstract
This research paper immerses itself in the study of the relationship that is formed between adolescent high school students and the internet, carefully examining its effects on both their school passage and family life. It was based on a quantitative analysis of data obtained by a group of thirty students from rural communities, and focused on three main points: first, how the students themselves perceive that the internet contributes to learning and expanding their knowledge; second, whether their teachers actually incorporate its use into everyday school practice; and third, the effects that its excessive use brings to relationships within the home. The results paint a reality full of contradictions. On the one hand, it is evident that young people recognize the value of the internet as an aid to their studies and are fully familiar with technology. On the other hand, however, this constant connection often seems to lead to friction and conflicts with the family. At the same time, the research reveals some notable differences between boys and girls, and especially a significant gap: although students see the enormous potential of the digital world, in the real school context its use often remains limited and superficial. The conclusion that emerges is clear: a collaborative approach between school and family is urgently needed, in order to cultivate a more balanced and beneficial relationship between adolescents and screens.
Downloads
References
Angrist, J., & Lavy, V. (2002). New evidence on classroom computers and pupil learning. The Economic Journal, 112(482), 735–765. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00068
Attewell, P., & Battle, J. (1999). Home computers and school performance. The Information Society, 15(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/019722499128628
Bayraktar, F., & Gün, Z. (2007). Incidence and correlates of Internet usage among adolescents in North Cyprus. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(2), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9969
Borzekowski, D. L. G., & Robinson, T. N. (2005). The remote, the mouse, and the No. 2 pencil: The household media environment and academic achievement among third grade students. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 159(7), 607–613. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.159.7.607
Brenner, V. (1997). Parameters of Internet use, abuse and addiction: The first 90 days of the Internet Usage Survey. Psychological Reports, 80(3), 879–882. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1997.80.3.879
Bukvova, H., Kalb, H., & Schoop, E. (2010). What we blog: A qualitative analysis of researchers’ weblogs. In Publishing in the networked world: Transforming the nature of communication, 14th international conference on electronic publishing (pp. 24–36). Helsinki University Press. file:///C:/Users/Hp/Downloads/What_we_blog_A_qualitative_analysis_of_researchers.pdf
Chan, P. A., & Rabinowitz, T. (2006). A cross-sectional analysis of video games and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in adolescents. Annals of General Psychiatry, 5, Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-5-16
Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2008). Scaling the digital divide: Home computer technology and student achievement. Duke University, Sanford School of Public Policy. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46467400_Scaling_the_Digital_Divide_Home_Computer_Technology_and_Student_Achievement
Davis, J., & Graf, M. (2005). Performance in e-learning: Online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 657–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00542.x
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2007). Government on the Internet: Progress in delivering information and services online. The Stationery Office. file:///C:/Users/Hp/Downloads/Government_on_the_Internet_Progress_in_D%20(1).pdf
Fancovicova, J., & Prokop, P. (2010). Development and initial psychometric assessment of the Plant Attitude Questionnaire. International Journal of Science Education, 32(19), 2627–2643. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-010-9207-x
Griffin, J., & Symington, D. (1997). Moving from task-oriented to learning-oriented strategies on school excursions to museums. Science Education, 81(6), 763–779. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199711)81:6<763::AID-SCE11>3.0.CO; 2-O
Harrison, C., Comber, C., Fisher, T., Haw, K., Lewin, C., Lunzer, E., McFarlane, A., Mavers, D., Scrimshaw, P., Somekh, B., & Watling, R. (2002). The impact of information and communication technologies on pupil learning and attainment. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (Becta). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277860037_ImpacCT2_The_Impact_of_Information_and_Communication_Technologies_on_Pupil_Learning_and_Attainment
Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. (2002). The Internet in everyday life: An introduction. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 3–41). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470774298.ch
Hill, J. O., & Peters, J. C. (1998). Environmental contributions to the obesity epidemic. Science, 280 (5368), 1371 1374. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5368.1371
Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P. G., Pascoe, C. J., & Robinson, L. (2008). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the Digital Youth Project. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. https://www.macfound.org/media/article_pdfs/DML_ETHNOG_WHITEPAPER.PDF
Jackson, L. A., von Eye, A., Biocca, F. A., Barbatsis, G., Zhao, Y., & Fitzgerald, H. E. (2006). Does home Internet use influence the academic performance of low-income children? Developmental Psychology, 42(3), 429–435. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.429
Kraut, R., Scherlis, W., Mukhopadhyay, T., Manning, J., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The HomeNet field trial of residential Internet services. Communications of the ACM, 39(12), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/240483.240493
Lee, S., & Chae, Y. (2007). Children’s Internet use in a family context: Influence on family relationships and parental mediation. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(5), 640–644. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9975
Lei, L., & Wu, Y. (2007). Adolescents’ paternal attachment and Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(5), 633–639. DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2007.9976
Lenhart, A., Madden, M., & Hitler, P. (2005). Teens and technology: Youth are leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation. Pew Internet & American Life Project. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/media/Files/Reports/2005/PIP_Teens_Tech_July2005web.pdf.pdf
Liu, C.-Y., & Kuo, F.-Y. (2007). A study of Internet addiction through the lens of the interpersonal theory. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(6), 799–804. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9951
Malamud, O., & Pop-Eleches, C. (2008). The effect of computer use on child outcomes (CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP6756). Centre for Economic Policy Research. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5091332_The_Effect_of_Computer_Use_on_Child_Outcomes
McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Coming out in the age of the Internet: Identity “demarginalization” through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.681
Moseley, D., Higgins, S., Bramald, R., Hardman, F., Miller, J., Mroz, M., Tse, H., Newton, D., Thompson, I., Williamson, J., Halligan, J., Bramald, S., & Newton, L. (1999). Ways forward with ICT: Effective pedagogy using information and communications technology for literacy and numeracy in primary schools. University of Newcastle. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232607629_Ways_forward_with_ICT_Effective_Pedagogy_using
Ouzouni, C., & Nakakis, K. (2011). Validity and reliability of measurement instruments in quantitative studies. Department of Nursing, University of Lamia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289292707_Validity_and_Reliability_of_Measurement_Instruments_in_Quantitative_Studies
Passey, D., & Higgins, S. (2011). Learning platforms and learning outcomes – insights from research. Learning, Media and Technology, 36(4), 329–333. file:///C:/Users/Hp/Downloads/Learning_platforms_and_learning_outcomes--insights.pdf
Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2002). The Internet goes to college: How students are living in the future with today’s technology. Pew Research Center. file:///C:/Users/Hp/Downloads/The_Internet_Goes_to_College_How_Students_Are_Livi.pdf
Rickert, V. I. (2001). Adolescent cyber surfing for health information: A new resource that crosses barriers. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 155(7), 813–817. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.155.7.813
Roschelle, J. M., Pea, R. D., Hoadley, C. M., Gordin, D. N., & Means, B. M. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The Future of Children, 10(2), 76–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602690
Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Russell, B., Canty, N., & Watkinson, A. (2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Learned Publishing, 24(3), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1087/20110306
Shields, M. K., & Behrman, R. E. (2000). Children and computer technology: Analysis and recommendations. The Future of Children, 10(2), 4–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602687
Subrahmanyam, K., Greenfield, P., Kraut, R., & Gross, E. (2001). The impact of computer use on children’s and adolescents’ development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(00)00063-0
Subrahmanyam, K., Kraut, R. E., Greenfield, P. M., & Gross, E. F. (2000). The impact of home computer use on children’s activities and development. The Future of Children, 10(2), 123–144. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602692
Turow, J. (1999). The Internet and the family: The view from parents, the view from the press (Report No. 27). Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Internet-and-the-family%3A-the-view-from-parents-Turow/bcf3960fa5c934771a64fe6ddf614b8c81ede086#citing-papers
Turow, J., & Nir, L. (2000). The Internet and the family 2000: The view from parents, the view from kids. Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234593311_The_Internet_and_the_Family_2000_The_View_from_Parents_the_View_from_Kids_Report_Series_No_33
Valkenburg, P. M., & Soeters, K. E. (2001). Children’s positive and negative experiences with the Internet. Communication Research, 28(5), 652–675. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280077548_Children’s_positive_and_negative_experiences_with_the_internet_An_exploratory_survey
Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Boase, J., & Chen, W. (2002, October). Examining the Internet in everyday life [Keynote address]. Euricom Conference on e-Democracy, Nijmegen, Netherlands. https://www.academia.edu/18719879/Examining_the_Internet_In_Everyday_Life
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Natsiopoulos D. Georgios
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
