Understanding Teacher Experiences Amidst Principal Reshuffling: A Phenomenological Inquiry

Authors

  • Kirk John Ponce Tonido Davao de Oro State College, Main Campus, Philippines
  • Tiffanie Limapajan Arana University of the Immaculate Conception, Philippines
  • Florannie Lapara Cenabre La Filipina National High School, Philippines
  • Jose Marie E. Ocdenaria Ateneo de Davao University, Philippines https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7969-1605

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v3i3.3215

Keywords:

Adaptability, Leadership Transitions, Principal Reshuffling, Professional Experiences

Abstract

This phenomenological study explores the experiences of Filipino teachers dealing with frequent changes in school principals within the Department of Education (DepEd) system. The research aims to understand the impact of these leadership transitions on teachers’ professional experiences and classroom dynamics, the strategies they employ to overcome associated challenges, and the insights they can share with their peers. The study gathered in-depth qualitative data from teachers across various educational levels and subjects using semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions. The findings reveal that frequent principal turnover leads to instability, disrupts academic performance, affects staff morale, and complicates the implementation of long-term initiatives. Teachers employ strategies such as maintaining continuity and stability, establishing clear communication channels, and fostering robust support systems to navigate these challenges. The study underscores the importance of adaptability, building strong relationships, effective communication, and ongoing professional development. The results highlight the need for educational policymakers to prioritize stability in leadership and provide support systems that help teachers adapt to changes, ensuring a conducive learning environment for students and a supportive atmosphere for educators. This research contributes to the broader understanding of the ecological impacts of leadership turnover and offers practical recommendations for enhancing teacher well-being and school performance amidst frequent administrative changes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. London: Pearson.

Grint, K. (2020). Leadership, management and command in the time of the coronavirus. Warwick University, UK. International Leadership Association. Retrieved from www.ila-net.org/Reflections/index.html

Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335-369. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319830380

Hallinger, P. (2019). Science mapping the knowledge base on educational leadership and management from the emerging regions of Asia, Africa and Latin America, 1965-2018. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48, 209-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218822772

Hamid, R., Hashim, N. H. M., Shukur, S. A. M., & Marmaya, N. H. (2021). The impact of Covid-19 on Malaysia tourism industry supply chain. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(16), 27–41.

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

Palinkas, L., Horwitz, S., Green, C., Wisdom, J., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration & Policy in Mental Health & Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Robinson, R., & Smith, O. L. (2020). Teacher perceptions and implementation of a content-area literacy professional development program. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 10, 55–69. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2020.10.1.04

Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63-75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201

Tobin, G. A., & Begley, C. M. (2004). Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48, 388-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03207.x

Zucker, K. J. (2004). Gender identity development and issues. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 13(3), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2004.02.006

Downloads

Published

2024-07-17

How to Cite

Tonido, K. J. P., Arana, T. L., Cenabre, F. L., & Ocdenaria, J. M. E. (2024). Understanding Teacher Experiences Amidst Principal Reshuffling: A Phenomenological Inquiry. American Journal of Education and Technology, 3(3), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v3i3.3215