Challenges to Rural Infrastructural Development and Coping Strategies in Mezam Division, North West Region of Cameroon

Authors

  • Funwi Godlove Ngwa Department of Geography, Faculty of Social and Management Sciences, University of Buea P.O. Box 63 Buea, Cameroon
  • Yinkfu Randy Nkuh Department of Geography, Faculty of Social and Management Sciences, University of Buea P.O. Box 63 Buea, Cameroon
  • Roland Nformi Department of Geography, Faculty of Social and Management Sciences, University of Buea P.O. Box 63 Buea, Cameroon
  • Ngwani Awudu Department of Geography, Faculty of Social and Management Sciences, University of Buea P.O. Box 63 Buea, Cameroon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v2i3.1776

Keywords:

Rural Infrastructure, Challenges, Coping Strategies, Mezam Division

Abstract

Despite efforts made to improve rural infrastructural development over time, many rural infrastructural projects in the rural Mezam Division have remained of poor quality. This paperset out t make an evaluation of the challenges faced by the local population in the Mezam Division and the coping strategies they have adopted to cope with the rural under development. 260 questionnaires were distributed and 210 were obtained. 30 interviews were conducted with rural dwellers, NGOs, community-Based Associations, and state administrators three focus group discussions were organized with 8 members, bringing the total to 24 participants. Multivariate analysis was utilized to establish the framework for judging the quality of rural infrastructural projects and to identify the various coping strategies in the Rural Mezam Division.Data have been analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively; and have been presented on figures, tables, and photos.Findings revealed that rural infrastructure projects in the Rural Mezam Division are often implemented in challenging environments such as a poor administrative system, scarcity of skilled labour force, low institutional capacity, and high levels of mismanagement. The various development sectors such as agriculture, transport, education and health sectors are affected negatively which has led to rural underdevelopment. As such, the rural people who are the main beneficiaries of rural infrastructure have adopted different coping strategies in the different development sectors in order to sustain their lives. Furthermore, the paper holds that the way forward is for the ruralcouncils to be made autonomous so that they can raise revenue through taxes and use the finances for rural development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

African Policy Circle (2020). Addressing the challenges of urbanisation in Africa. A summary of 2019 Africa policy discussion

Blackman, R., (2003). Community-base and-driven development: The World Bank Research Observer. 19 (1). The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development

Davids, I., Maphunye, K. and Theron, F. (2005). Participatory development in South Africa: A development management perspective. Pretoria: J. L. van Schaik Publishers

FAO (2005). Plan of action for people’s participation in rural development: Twenty-sixth session, FAO conference. Rome, 9-28, Nov.

Gebremdhin, S. H. (2004). Assessing community participation for sustainable development: the Galanefhi water supply project. Unpublished master’s thesis. Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch

Kimengsi, J. N & Amawa, S. G. (2015). Water rationing in the Buea municipality; patterns effects and copping strategies. African Journal of Social Sciences 6(3), 39-sl

Lambi, C. M. (2001). Environmental constraints and indigenous agricultural intensification in Ndop Plain, Upper Noun Valley of Cameroon. Readings in Geography. 179-190

Ndenecho, E. N. (2009). Implications of Fuel Wood Yield, Availability and Harvest in Tubah Mountain Forest, Cameroon. Global Journal of Human Social Science,10, 49-55

Ngwani, A., Nformi, R., Ngwa. F. G. and Yinkfu. R. (2023). Spatial planning Challenges and implications on the development of Nkambe and Ndu secondary towns in the North-West of Cameroon. International Journal of Current Research in Multi-discipline, 8(2), 01-14

Raniga, T. and Simpson, B. (2002). Community participation: rhetoric or reality. Social work: A Professional Journal for the Social Worker, 38(2), 182-190.

Thwala, W. D. (2010). Community participation is a necessity for project success: African Journal of Agricultural research, 5(10), 970-979. http://www/academicjournals.org/AJAR

UN (2005). A division for sustainable development. Indicators for sustainable development: Review and assessment, background paper, New York.

WHO (2018). Drinking water, world health organisation fact sheets. https://www.whoint/int news room fact-sheet. Accessed 27th 2020

World Bank (2003). Reaching the rural poor. A renewed strategy for rural development, Washington DC

World Bank (2004). World development report: Making services work for poor people. Washington DC: World Bank

Downloads

Published

2023-08-05

How to Cite

Ngwa, F. G., Nkuh, Y. R., Nformi, R., & Awudu, N. (2023). Challenges to Rural Infrastructural Development and Coping Strategies in Mezam Division, North West Region of Cameroon. American Journal of Education and Technology, 2(3), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v2i3.1776