Bridging the Gap between Digital Native Students and Digital Immigrant Professors: Reciprocal Learning and Current Challenges

Authors

  • Haytham Elaoufy Applied linguistics and language development laboratory, Faculty of letters and human sciences, Moulay Ismail University, Morocco

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v2i2.1522

Keywords:

Challenge, Digital Immigrant, Digital Native, Learning Environment, Mutual Learning, Technology

Abstract

The difference between individuals who have grown up using technology (digital natives) and those who have not (digital immigrants) continues to expand as technology develops. This gap is noticeable at universities where digital immigrant professors and native students interact. Since digital native students and digital immigrant professors have different learning and teaching preferences and needs, both sides must take these differences into account to create an effective learning environment. Thus, the current study was carried out to ascertain professors’ perceptions regarding technology integration, their challenges, and what students (digital natives) and professors (digital immigrants) might learn from one another. The study included 206 EFL students and 19 EFL professors at Moulay Ismail University, Morocco, who successfully completed an online questionnaire. Based on the quantitative and qualitative findings obtained, it was found that despite the difficulties encountered, such as content overload, fake news, distraction, and technical concerns, both students and professors responded favorably to the topic of integrating technology in the educational sector. The findings also demonstrated that students who are digital natives could teach their professors a lot about how to use, navigate, and harness technology. Conversely, professors who are digital immigrants can teach students who are digital natives a lot about how to gather information from traditional sources, what to do when technology fails, and the value of interpersonal communication in the classroom.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arabac, I. B., & Polat, M. (2013). Dijital yerliler, dijital gocmenler ve sinif yonetimi. Elektronik Sysyal Bilimler, 12(47), 11–20.

Barbuceanu, C. D. (2020). Teaching the digital natives. Revista De Științe Politice, 65, 136–145.

Bilgic, H. G., Dogan, D., & Seferoglu, S. S. (2016). Digital natives in online learning environments: New bottle old wine – the design of online learning environments for today’s generation. Handbook of Research on Engaging Digital Natives in Higher Education Settings, 192–221. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0039-1.ch009

Branscombe, A., Goswami, D., Schwartz, J., Bowen, B. (1992). Students teaching/Teachers learning. Heinemann.

Cimen, B., & Hangul, S. (2021). Digital immigrant teachers’ perceptions about digital native students: An investigation into turkish school context. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 14(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.32457/ejep.v14i2.1576

Compeau, D., & Higgins, C. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/249688

Gallardo-Echenique, E., Marques-Molas, L., Bullen, M., & Strijbos, J. (2015). Let’s talk about digital learners in the digital era. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 156–187.

Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Meridian. Wiley, New York

GU, X., ZHU, Y., & Guo, X. (2013). Meeting the “Digital natives”: Understanding the acceptance of technology in classrooms. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 392–402.

Guo, R., Dobson, T., & Petrina, S. (2008). Digital natives, digital immigrants : An analysis of age and ICT competency in teacher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(3), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.38.3.a

Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2011). Adults learning online: Digital choice and/or digital exclusion? New Media & Society, 13(4), 534–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810374789

Howe,N., & Strauss, W . (2003). Millennials go to College. American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers.

Ktoridou, D., & Eteokleous- Grigoriou, N. (2011). Developing digital immigrants’ computer literacy: The case of unemployed women. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 28(3), 154–163.

Mete, R., Riegel, C., Kozen, & Polka, W. (2017). What every contemporary teacher educator needs to know about technology. . .but, didn’t know about who to ask! The Journal of the Illinois Association of Teacher Educators, 26, 41–55.

National Research Council (1999). Being fluent with information technology. National Academy Press, Washington.

Papert, S., & Resnick, M. (1995). Technological fluency and the representation of knowledge: Proposal to the national science foundation. MIT Media Laboratory, Cambridge.

Peimani, N., & Kamalipour, H. (2021). Online education in the post covid-19 era: Students’ perception and learning experience. Education Sciences, 11(10), 633. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100633

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On The Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816

Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guardia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923–945.

Riegel, C., & Mete, R. (2017). Educational Technologies for K-12 learners: What digital natives and digital immigrants can teach one another. Educational Planning, 24(4), 49–58.

Sharma, M. (2017). Teacher in a digital ear. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology: G Interdisciplinary, 17(3), 10–14.

Tapscott, D. (1998). Educating the Net generation. Educational Leadership, 56(5), 6-11.

The role of IT literacy in defining digital divide policy needs. (2011). 5th International Conference on Electronic Government, 28(1), 3–10.

Valek, J., & Sladek, P. (2012). Immersed into digital world: Learning and students’ perception. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1866–1870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.139

Vassilakopoulou, P., & Hustad, E. (2021). Bridging digital divides : A literature review and research agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Frontiers, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10096-3

Vodanovich, S., Sundaram, D., & Myers, M. (2010). Research commentary: Digital natives and ubiquitous information systems. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 711–723.

Wang, E., Myers, M., & Sundaram, D. (2012). Digital natives and digital immigrants: Towards a model of digital fluency. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 5(6), 409–419.

Wang, Q., Myers, M., & Sundaram, D. (2013). Digital natives and digital immigrants towards a model of digital fluency. The European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-013-0390-2

Zur, O. (2011). On digital immigrants and digital natives: How the digital divide affects families, educational institutions and the workplace. Zur Institute: Innovative Resources and Online Continuing Education, 1–13.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-28

How to Cite

Elaoufy, H. (2023). Bridging the Gap between Digital Native Students and Digital Immigrant Professors: Reciprocal Learning and Current Challenges. American Journal of Education and Technology, 2(2), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v2i2.1522