Input Security and Industrial Vulnerability: The Impact of U.S.–Iran Tensions on Indonesia’s Nickel Industry

Authors

  • Hanan Nugroho National Development Planning Agency, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Achmanto Mendatu The Indonesia Think Tank & Policy Hub, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Muhyiddin Muhyiddin National Development Planning Agency, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajenr.v5i1.7466

Keywords:

Critical Minerals, Geopolitics, Indonesia, Input Security, Nickel Industrialization, Supply Chain Vulnerability

Abstract

This study examines how geopolitical tensions between the United States and Iran affect Indonesia’s nickel industrialization by disrupting sulfur supply chains linked to the Strait of Hormuz. While existing research focuses primarily on energy markets, the implications for industrial input dependencies remain underexplored. Using a qualitative analytical approach that combines value chain analysis, geopolitical risk assessment, and scenario-based reasoning, the study traces how external shocks propagate through intermediate external shocks propagate through intermediate input constraints into domestic industrial systems. The findings show that High Pressure Acid Leach (HPAL) technology—critical for producing battery-grade nickel—is structurally dependent on sulfur, a largely imported and non-substitutable input sourced from geopolitically sensitive regions. This dependence exposes Indonesia’s nickel industry to chokepoint risks, where supply disruptions increase costs, compress margins, and constrain production. The study advances the concept of input security, demonstrating that industrial upgrading does not eliminate vulnerability but reconfigures it through new external dependencies. It highlights the need for supply diversification, domestic capacity development, and proactive geoeconomic strategies to strengthen industrial resilience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, W. (2025). Big data and ESG (environmental, social, governance) reporting in finance. American Journal of Economics and Business Innovation, 4(3). https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5322-2333

Arif, I. (2018). Nikel Indonesia. Gramedia.

Argus Media. (2026). Sulfur market analysis and price report.

https://www.argusmedia.com/en/solutions/products/argus-sulphur

Asian Development Bank. (2023). Indonesia’s critical minerals development and value chain integration. Asian.

Asosiasi Pertambangan Nikel Indonesia. (2026, March). APNI. https://www.apni.or.id/

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2026, March). Ekspor dan impor. https://www.bps.go.id/id/exim

Crundwell, F. K., Moats, M. S., Ramachandran, V., Robinson, T. G., & Davenport, W. G. (2011). Extractive metallurgy of nickel, cobalt and platinum group metals. Elsevier.

Dalvi, A. D., Bacon, W. G., & Osborne, R. C. (2004). The past and the future of nickel laterites. Prospectors & Developers Association of Canada.

Fastmarkets. (2025). Battery raw materials outlook 2025. Fastmarkets.

George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.

Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104.

Humphreys, D. (2013). The remaking of the mining industry. Palgrave Macmillan.

International Energy Agency. (2021). The role of critical minerals in clean energy transitions. IEA.

International Energy Agency. (2023). Critical minerals market review 2023. IEA.

Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources. (2021). Grand strategy for mineral and coal: Direction for upstream and downstream development. MEMR.

Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources. (2025). Indonesia mineral and coal statistics 2025. MEMR.

Mudd, G. M. (2010). Global trends and environmental issues in nickel mining: Sulfides versus laterites. Ore Geology Reviews, 38(1–2), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2010.05.003

Nugroho, H., & Al-Wafiy, M. (2026). Evolusi industri nikel global dan Indonesia: Tinjauan historis dan pelajaran kebijakan. Bappenas Working Papers, 9(2), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.47266/bwp.v9i2.560

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Global material resources outlook to 2060. OECD.

Overland, I. (2019). The geopolitics of renewable energy: Debunking four emerging myths. Energy Research & Social Science, 49, 36–40.

Shanghai Metals Market. (2026, March). Metal prices and market data. https://www.metal.com/

Trading Economics. (2026, March). Sulfur. https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/sulfur

Udim, I. O., Daniel, N. E., & Abioye, G. T. (2025). Regional instability and transnational security threats in West and Central Africa: Implications for international peacebuilding. American Journal of Development Studies, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.54536/ajds.v3i2.5609

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2023). Commodities at a glance: Special issue on critical minerals. UNCTAD.

United States Geological Survey. (2024a). Mineral commodity summaries 2024: Nickel. USGS.

United States Geological Survey. (2024b). Mineral commodity summaries 2024: Sulfur. USGS.

World Bank. (2020). Minerals for climate action: The mineral intensity of the clean energy transition. World Bank.

Yergin, D. (2011). The quest: Energy, security, and the remaking of the modern world. Penguin Press.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-08

How to Cite

Nugroho, H. ., & Muhyiddin, M. . (2026). Input Security and Industrial Vulnerability: The Impact of U.S.–Iran Tensions on Indonesia’s Nickel Industry. American Journal of Energy and Natural Resources, 5(1), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajenr.v5i1.7466

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.