Selection of a Suitable Material by a Multi-Criteria Decision Aid Method (Mcdm) for the Manufacture of the Buckets of a Micro Pelton Turbine

Authors

  • Haoua Laila Tidjani National Committee for Development of Technologies, Ministry of Scientific Research and Innovation, Yaoundé, Cameroon
  • Matho Mekjele Raïssa National Committee for Development of Technologies, Ministry of Scientific Research and Innovation, Yaoundé, Cameroon
  • Joseph Kenfack National Higher Polytechnic School, University of Yaoundé, Yaoundé, Cameroon
  • Oumarou Hamandjoda National Higher Polytechnic School, University of Yaoundé, Yaoundé, Cameroon
  • Patrice Abiama Ele National Committee for Development of Technologies, Ministry of Scientific Research and Innovation, Yaoundé, Cameroon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajenr.v2i1.1101

Keywords:

Ahp, Micro Hydro Power Plant, Pelton Turbine, Topsis, Vikor

Abstract

Micro hydro power plant remains a sustainable solution to meet the electrical needs of isolated populations when the potential is there. The discovery of new materials leads engineers to review the choice of material, in order to reduce the cost and facilitate the manufacture of hydromechanical components. In this study, to select the best choice of material for the manufacture of buckets of a micro Pelton turbine, we used multi-criteria decision support methods (MCDM) such as the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), the order preference technique by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS), the compromise solution (VIKOR). Based on of the literature review on the materials usable for the manufacture of hydraulic turbines, we were able to select five alternative materials such as mild steel ; aluminum alloy ; stainless steel ; high density polyethylene ; cast iron and seven very important material evaluation criteria for manufacturing such as machinability ; ultimate tensile strength ; the density ; hardness ; the cost ; maintenance cost and corrosion resistance. It appears from results via the AHP method that the coherence index of 0.0904 and the coherence ratio of 0.0669 are usable for the practice of material selection. Considering the performance scores for the five alternatives obtained via the TOPSIS and VIKOR techniques, it appears that high density polyethylene is the best material, followed by the aluminum alloy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anojkumar L, IM (2014). Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 2964–80.

Asodariya, HP (2018). Application of multi-criteria decision-making method to select and validate the material of a flywheel design. Mater. Today: Proceedings, 5, 17147–17155.

Association., IH (2019). International Hydropower Association. Hydropower Status Report - sector trends and insights. London, UK.

Aydin, N. Y., Kentel, E., & Duzgun, H. S. (2013). GIS-based site selection methodology for hybrid renewable energy systems: A case study from western Turkey. Energy conversion and management, 70, 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.02

Babu, KR (2006). The material selection for typical wind turbine blades using a MADM approach & analysis of blades. Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM 2006), Chania, Greece, 19–23.

Badri, MA (2001). A combined AHP–GP model for quality control systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 72, 27–40.

CH Achebe, OO (2020). Design and implementation of a crossflow turbine for Pico hydropower electricity generation. Helyon, 6.

Chan, FT (2007). Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. OMEGA, 35, 417–431.

Chatterjee P, AV (2009). Selection of materials using compromised ranking and outranking methods. Mater Des, 30, 4043–53.

Chen Y, LD (2016). Capturing the rains: a comparative study of Chinese involvement in Cameroon’s hydropower sector. Washington, D.C.

Chisomo Kasamba, PM (2015). Analysis of Flow Estimation Methods for Small Hydropower Schemes in Bua River. Energy and Power Engineering, 7, 55-62.

Cicek K, CM (2010). Multiple attribute decision-making solution to material selection problem based on modified fuzzy axiomatic design-model selection interface algorithm. . Mater Des 31, 2129–33.

Dagdeviren, M. &. (2008). Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management. . Information Science, 1717–1733.

Deng, DZ (2017). Ultra-low-head hydroelectric technology: A review. Renew. sustain. Energy Rev., 78, 23–30.

Ebhota, WS (2017). Smart Design and Development of a Small Hydropower System and Exploitation of Locally Source of Material for Pelton Turbine Bucket Production. Iran. J.Sci. Technology. Trans. Mech. Eng, 9.

Elie Bertrand Kengne Signe, BB (2019). Performance in Feasibility Studies of Micro Hydro Power Plants New Software Development and Application Cases in Cameroon. Energy Procedia 157, 1391–1403.

Elie Bertrand Kengne Signe, OH (2017). Technical and Economic Feasibility Studies of a Micro Hydropower Plant in Cameroon for a Sustainable Development. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, 5, 64-73.

Elie Bertrand Kengne, OH (2017). Methodology of Feasibility Studies of Micro-Hydro power plants in Cameroon: Case of the Micro-hydro of KEMKEN. Energy Procedia, 119, 17-28.

ENEO., C. (2019). Step by Step, Eneo is transforming electricity services towards modernizing electricity distribution 2018 Annual Report. Douala.

Engo, J. (2019). Barriers related to the deployment of renewable energies in Cameroon and ways to strengthen policies. Resour Environ Econ, 1, 29-38.

Fanyep Nana Antoine, GT (2020). Sustainable Development around Small Scale Mining Areas by the Development of Micro Hydro Power: Application Cases in Cameroon. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering,, 8, 36-48.

Felix A. Isholaa, *. J. (2019). Simulation for Material Selection for a Pico Pelton Turbine’s Wheel and Buckets. Procedia Manufacturing 35, 1172–1177.

Gudukeya L, MI (2013). Efficiency improvement of Pelton wheel and crossflow turbines in micro-hydro power plants: case study. Int JEng Computing Sci 2, 416–432.

Hwang CL, YK (1981). Multiple attribute decision making, methods and applications. Springer-Varlag.

HYDRO., A. (nd). Hydropower in central Africa. HydroNews Africa.

I. Loots, M. v. (2015). A review of low head hydropower technologies and applications in a South African context. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 1254–1268.

IEA. (2020). World. Energy Outlook 2020. Paris, France.

IEA., A. (2019). Energy Outlook 2019 world energy. Paris: Outlook special report.

Ilangkumaran, M. &. (2010). Integrated hazard and operability study using fuzzy linguistics approach in petrochemical industry. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 27, 541–557.

Islam, A. K. M. K., Bhuyan, S., & Chowdhury, F. A. (2013). Advanced composite pelton wheel design and study its performance for pico/micro hydro power plant application. Int. J. Eng. Innov. Technol, 2(11), 126-132.

Kahraman, CB (2004). Measuring flexibility of computer integrated manufacturing systems using fuzzy cash flow analysis. Information Sciences, 168, 77–94.

Kenfack J, BO (2014). Addressing the current remote area electrification problems with solar and microhydro systems in Central Africa. Renew Energy. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.11.044

Korkovelos A, MD (2018). A geospatial assessment of small-scale hydropower potential in sub-saharan. Energy, 11, 1-21.

Kusakana, K. (2014). A survey of innovative technologies increasing the viability of micro-hydropower as a cost effective rural electrification option in South Africa. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 37, 370–379.

Him D, LH (2019). World small hydropower development report 2019 - Africa. . UNIDO & ICSHP; 2019.

Mahmoodzadeh, SS (2007). Project selection by using Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS technique. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, , 1(3), 135–140.

Mansor, MR (2013). Hybrid natural and glass fibers reinforced polymer composites material selection using analytical hierarchy process for automotive brake lever design. Materials & Design, 51, 484–492.

Mas’ud AA, VW-S. (2015). An assessment of renewable energy readiness in Africa: case study of Cameroon and Nigeria. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 51, 775-784.

Mbiu RN, MS (2015). Performance of aluminum A356 alloy based buckets towards bending forces on Pelton turbine. In: Sustainable research and innovation (SRI), 134–138.

Mohammad., V. (2015). Future of agricultural water management in Africa. Arch Agron Soil Sci, 907-27.

Mohammed YS, MM (2013). Status of renewable energy consumption. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 27, 453-63.

Moradeyo K. Odunfa, TC (2019). Development of a Small Hydropower Plant: Case of Ikere Gorge Dam, Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, 7, 31-45.

Mutiara AS, ,. M. (2018). Recent innovations and trends in in-conduit hydropower technologies and their applications in water distribution systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 416–428.

Ohunakin, OS (2018). A comparative study of selected multi-criteria decision-making methodologies for location selection of very large concentrated solar power plants in Nigeria. . Afr. J.Sci. Technology. Innov. Dev. 10(5), 551–567.

Opricovic, S. &. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455.

Paish, O. (2002). Small hydro power: technology and current status. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 6(6), 537–56.

Prado, RV (2010). Abrasive wear effect of sugarcane juice on sugarcane rolls. Wear, 270, 83–87.

Pravin, GR (2007). Role of stainless steel to combat corrosion in the Indian sugar industry. International Sugar Journal, 109(1303), 449–453.

Ravi Kumar n, SS (2015). Penstock material selection in small hydropower plants using MADM methods. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 240-255.

Reddy NNI, SP (2015). Design and static analysis of Pelton turbine bucket. Int J Sci Technol Manag, 4, 19–25.

SJ Williamson, BH (2014). “Low head pico hydro turbine selection using a multi-criteria analysis. Renew. Energy, 61, 43–50.

Saaty, TL (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

San Cristobal, JR (2011). Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in spain: The Vikor method. Renewable Energy, 36, 498–502.

Smith, P. (2005). Piping materials selections and applications. Elsevier.

Tekounegning, Ho (2009). Constraints Of Micro Hydroelectric Power Plants In The West Region Of Cameroon. Global Journal Of Engineering Research, 8(1&2), 27-33.

Thakker A, JJ (2008). A novel approach to materials selection strategy case study: wave energy extraction impulse turbine blade. Mater Des, 29, 1973–80.

Urban Nzotcha∗, JK (2019). Integrated multi-criteria decision making methodology for pumped hydroenergy storage plant site selection from a sustainable development perspective with an application. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 112, 930–947.

Valipour, MG (2015). Surface irrigation simulation models. a review. Int J Hydrol Sci Technol, 5(1), 51-70.

Wang, JJ (2007). Using a hybrid multi-criteria decision aid method for information systems outsourcing. Computers and Operations Research, 3691–3700.

Weber H, P. (2003). FF Simulation models of the hydro power plants in Macedonia and Yugoslavia. . In: Proceedings of the power tech. 2003.

Wesley, S.B. (2012). Corrosion behavior of ferritic steel, ustenitic steel and low carbon steel grades in sugarcane juice. Journal of Materials & Metallurgical Engineering, 2(1), 9–22.

Williams S. Ebhota1, FL (2017). Smart Design and Development of a Small Hydropower System and Exploitation of Locally Sourced Material for Pelton Turbine Bucket Production. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng., 80.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-29

How to Cite

Tidjani, H. L., Raïssa, M. M., Kenfack, J., Hamandjoda, O., & Ele, P. E. (2023). Selection of a Suitable Material by a Multi-Criteria Decision Aid Method (Mcdm) for the Manufacture of the Buckets of a Micro Pelton Turbine. American Journal of Energy and Natural Resources, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajenr.v2i1.1101