Social Taboos on Wetland Fauna
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajec.v4i2.5042Keywords:
Conservation, Fauna, Knowledge Management, Taboos, WetlandAbstract
Taboos play a significant role in conservation of biodiversity; they regulate practices of a community and reduce pressure on species. Wetlands of Bangladesh are diversified and rich with biodiversity. The objective of the study was to explore the potential of taboos in development and conservation planning of wetland fauna. To document the taboos in a wetland the biodiversity, conservation, social norms and practices of the Medir Haor under Nasirnagar sub-district of Brahmanbaria district were studied. Community consultations, key informant interviews and field observations were conducted between July 2022 and June 2024. Many fishes are not eaten. At least 15 species of animals were recorded undisturbed and respected because of religious and social norms. The sacred lands are protected habitat for fauna. The taboos on fauna have association with myth, tells, cultures and social values. Almost all the taboos are known to all age groups of the people even though the traditional knowledge is not documented and is transmitted verbally. Taboos associated with religious norms are being practiced without any deviation. Taboos help conservation. Taboos are very localized specific. Since there is a gap in knowledge management, a necessary attempt is recommended to include the values of taboos in environmental education and conservation education. Documentation of those taboos and exploring the links with science and history can help conservation efforts. Inter-disciplinary researchers may contribute to more comprehensive and rigorous study. Policy advocacy is necessary to make the policy makers understand the importance of taboos in conservation planning and implementation.
Downloads
References
Alves, R. R. N., Silva, J. S., L, S. & Albuquerque, U. P. (2018). Chapter 25 - Ethnozoology and Animal Conservation. Alves, R. R. N. & Albuquerque, U. P. (Eds). Ethnozoology (pp 481-496). Academic Press, (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128099131000259)
Barman, A., Rajak, F. & Jha, R. (2025). Integrating traditional knowledge systems for wetland conservation and management: A critical analysis. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 24(1), B 4212. https://doi.org/10.46488/NEPT.2025. v24i01. B4212
Begossi, A. (2006). Temporal stability in fishing spots: conservation and co-management in Brazilian artisanal coastal fisheries. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01380-110105
Borah, M. P., & Prasad, S. B. (2017). Ethnozoological study of animals based medicine used by traditional healers and indigenous inhabitants in the adjoining areas of Gibbon Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam. Indian Journal of Ethnobiology & Ethnomedicine, 13, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-017-0167-6
Colding, J., & C. Folke. (1997). The relations among threatened species, their protection, and taboos. Conservation Ecology, 1(1), 6. Available from the Internet. URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss1/art6/
Egwunatum, A. E., & Okonta, B. C. (2023). Assessment of Habitat Fragmentation Impact on Community Taboo species for adoption as conservation portfolios in lowland rainforest ecological zone of Delta State, Nigera. Journal of Biodiversity Conservation and Bioresources Management, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.3329/jbcbm.v9i2.70054
Haq, S. M., Waheed, M., & Bussmann, R. W. (2024). “Traditional” use in a global world: unsustainable ethnozoological usage among Himalayan ethnic groups drives species to extinction. Biodiversity and Conservation, 33, 1125-1144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02778-0
Ihinmikaiye, S. O., Ochekwu, E. B. & Ojo, V. I. (2022). The use of myths and taboos in wildlife conservation: The case of Bayelsa-East Senatorial District of Nigeria. The Zoologist, 20. 141-149. https://doi.org/10.4314/tzool.v20i1.18
International Society of Ethnobiology (2006). ISE Code of Ethics (with 2008 additions). Online: http://ethnobiology.net/code-of-ethics
Jaroli, D. P., Mahawar, M. M., & Vyas, N. (2010) An ethnozoological study in the adjoining areas of Mount Abu wildlife sanctuary, Indian Journal of Ethnobiology & Ethnomedicine, 10(6), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-6-6.
Jimoh, S. O., Emmanuel, T. E., Alarape, A. A., & Adeyemi, A. A. (2012). The Role of Traditional Laws and Taboos in Wildlife Conservation in the Oban Hill Sector of Cross River National Park (CRNP), Nigeria. Journal of Human Ecology, 39(3), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2012.11906513
Jones, J. P., Andriamarovololona, M. M., & Hockley, N. (2008). The importance of taboos and social norms to conservation in Madagascar. Conservation Biology, 22(4), 976-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00970.x
Kumar, R., Horwitz, P., & Max Finlayson, C. (2023). 19 - Wetlands as social–ecological systems: Bridging nature and society, Editor(s): Peter A. Gell, Davidson, N. C. & Max Finlayson, C. (Eds). Ramsar Wetlands (pp 525-553). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817803-4.00021-8.
Mengistu, M., Kebebew, M., & Meyer-Rochow, V. B. (2024). Ethnozoological study of medicinal animals used by the inhabitants of the Kucha District, Gamo Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Ethnobiology & Ethnomedicine, 20, 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-024-00714-8
Newaz, M. W., & Rahman, S. (2019). Wetland resource governance in Bangladesh: An analysis of community-based co-management approach. Environmental Development, 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.envdev.2019.06.001.
Talukder, B., Nobukazu, N., & Rashid, M. S. (2009). State and management of wetlands in Bangladesh. Landscape & Ecological Engineering, 5, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-008-0052-5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tapas Ranjan Chakraborty
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
