Demonstration and Participatory Evaluation of Different Improved Forage Grass Species in Danan District of Shabele Zone, Somali, Ethiopia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajaas.v4i1.5115Keywords:
Agronomic Performance, Biomass Yield, Improved Forage VarietiesAbstract
The study was conducted at Danan district with the objective of introducing and participatory farm evaluation of improved forage for three improved forage varieties; Sudan grass, Rhodes grass and Panicum maximum were evaluated in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Data on growth yield and yield related parameters were collected and analyzed using SAS software. The result indicated that the number of tillers per plant, height biomass yield (qt/ha) were significantly different (P<0.05) among this forage species. The highest plant height was recorded from Sudan grass (200.00cm) followed by Rhodes grass (84.67cm) and the shortest plant height was recorded from Panicum maximum (70cm) grass. Moreover, Sudan grass and Rhodes grass produced significantly (P<0.05) higher branches per plant than Panicum maximum grass. Furthermore, the Sudan grass had significantly (p<0.01) higher biomass yield than Rhodes and Panicum grass. On the other hand, Rhodes grass had higher (P<0.05) biomass yield than Panicum maximum grass variety. According to the amount of forage product they produce in the areas, biomass, easy management, and palatability, Sudan grass was ranked as first, followed by Rhodes grass, by all the farmers. In conclusion all forage grass was adapted in the areas therefore it is recommendable to scale up this technology in Danan districts and other areas with same agro ecology and based farmer’s preferences Sudan grass is highly recommended for scaling up due to its productivity, adaptability and easy management. Further demonstration trials across different agro-ecological zones are highly appreciated.
Downloads
References
Belete, T., Kidane, G., & Demelash, N. (2018). Participatory evaluation of some selected forage species in Afar Regional State, Ethiopia: In the case of Koneba and Telalak districts. Advances in Crop Science and Technology, 6, 370. https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-8863.1000370
Birhan, M. (2013). Livestock resource potential and constraints in Somali Regional State, Ethiopia. Global Veterinaria, 10(4), 432–438.
CSA (Central Statistical Agency). (2015). Agricultural sample survey 2014/15 (Volume II): Report on livestock and livestock characteristics (Private Peasant Holdings). Central Statistical Agency.
CSA (Central Statistical Agency). (2018). Agricultural sample survey 2017/18: Livestock and livestock characteristics (Statistical Bulletin 587). Central Statistical Agency.
IPS (Industrial Project Service). (2002). Resource potential assessments and project identification study of Somali Region: Agricultural resources. Industrial Project Service.
Legesse, G., Abebe, G., Siegmund-Schultze, M., & Zárate, A. V. (2008). Small ruminant production in two mixed-farming systems of southern Ethiopia: Status and prospects for improvement. Experimental Agriculture, 44(3), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479708006379
Mganga, K. Z., Musimba, N. K. R., Nyariki, D. M., Nyangito, M. M., & Mwang’ombe, A. W. (2015). The choice of grass species to combat desertification in semi‐arid Kenyan rangelands is greatly influenced by their forage value for livestock. Grass and Forage Science, 70(1), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12095
Tolera, A., Yami, A., & Alemu, D. (2012). Livestock feed resources in Ethiopia: Challenges, opportunities and the need for transformation. Ethiopia Animal Feed Industry Association.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Abdi Abdilahi, Mukhtar Mahamoud, Fosiya Hussein, Aden Omer

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.