Patterns of Distribution in Context with Habitat Preference, and Conservation Threats of Indian Grey Wolf (Canis lupus pallipes) in Nauradehi Wildlife Sanctuary, Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India

Authors

  • Noyan Uppadhai Department of Wildlife Science, Kota University, MBS Marg, near Kabir Circle, Swami Vivekananda Nagar, Kota, Rajasthan, India
  • Swati Sen Department of Wildlife Science, Kota University, MBS Marg, near Kabir Circle, Swami Vivekananda Nagar, Kota, Rajasthan, India
  • Salvador Lyngdoh Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
  • Sapna Bhargava Department of Wildlife Science, Kota University, MBS Marg, near Kabir Circle, Swami Vivekananda Nagar, Kota, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/jwc.v2i1.5012

Keywords:

Indian Grey Wolf, Major Threats, Nauradehi Wildlife Sanctuary, Occupancy Modelling

Abstract

The Indian Gray Wolf (Canis lupus pallipes) is a keystone species in India’s arid and semi-arid ecosystems, but due to habitat degradation, prey scarcity, and human-wildlife conflict, this species is facing serious threats. This study aimed to (1) identify the distribution and habitat preferences of Indian Grey Wolves and (2) assess the key conservation threats they face within Nauradehi Wildlife Sanctuary, Madhya Pradesh. Data were collected from July to September 2023 using 102 km of line transects and 448 km of vehicle transects across three forest ranges. A total of 36 sites were surveyed using sign surveys and geospatial tools, and occupancy was analysed using a single-season occupancy model in R Studio with the ‘unmarked’ package. The naïve occupancy estimate was 0.531, while forest cover (ψ = 0.3, p = 0.045) and prey density (ψ = 0.5, p = 0.023) significantly influenced occupancy. Detection probability was positively associated with temperature (p = 0.012) and negatively with cloud cover (p = 0.045). The small sample size (36 sites × 3 surveys) posed a limitation, addressed using Maximum Penalized Likelihood Estimation to reduce bias. Results suggest wolves are avoiding human settlements and preferring denser forest patches, likely due to increased anthropogenic pressure in open habitats. Conservation implications include prioritizing habitat restoration, ensuring the availability of wild prey, and implementing community-based conflict mitigation strategies to reduce retaliatory killings and promote coexistence. This field study is one of the first ever done in the region and could act as a baseline for research and planning related to conservation strategies that may assure the survival of this endangered carnivore.

References

Aggarwal, R. K., Kivisild, T., Ramadevi, J., & Singh, L. (2007). Mitochondrial DNA diversity in Indian Grey wolves: Genetic evidence for an ancient origin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(26), 9876–9881. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0610395104

Bashir, T., Bhattacharya, T., Poudyal, K., Sathyakumar, S., & Qureshi, Q. (2014). Prey selection by snow leopard (Panthera uncia) and Indian Grey wolf (Canis lupus pallipes) in a high-altitude ecosystem. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e88274. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088274

Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach (2nd ed.). Springer.

Chandler, R. B., Royle, J. A., & Posit team. (2024). Unmarked: Analysis of occupancy and abundance data (Version 4.2.2) [R package]. https://cran.r-project.org/package=unmarked

Dormann, C. F., Elith, J., Bacher, S., Buchmann, C., Carl, G., Carré, G., García Marquéz, J. R., Gruber, B., Lafourcade, B., Leitão, P. J., Münkemüller, T., McClean, C., Osborne, P. E., Reineking, B., Schröder, B., Skidmore, A. K., Zurell, D., & Lautenbach, S. (2013). Collinearity: A review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography, 36(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x

Habib, B., & Kumar, S. (2007). Den-site selection by Indian Grey wolf (Canis lupus pallipes) in a human-dominated landscape in Maharashtra, India. Current Science, 92(5), 686–690.

Habib, B., Kumar, S., & Jhala, Y. (2014). Ecology of the Indian Grey wolf (Canis lupus pallipes): A review. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 30, 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467414000208

Hutchinson, J. M. C., & Waser, P. M. (2015). Use of maximum penalized likelihood estimation in wildlife studies. Ecological Modelling, 313, 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.05.002

Jhala, Y. V. (2003). Status, ecology, and conservation of the Indian Grey wolf (Canis lupus pallipes). Biological Conservation, 116, 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00184-4

Jhala, Y.V. and Sharma, D.K. (1997). Child-lifting by wolves in eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Wildlife Research, 2(2): 94–101.

Karanth, K. U., Nichols, J. D., & Hines, J. E. (2011). Camera traps and occupancy modeling in wildlife research. Springer.

Kumar S. and Rahmani, A.R. (2000). Livestock depredation by wolves in the Great Indian Bustard sanctuary, Nanaj (Maharashtra, India). J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 97(3): 340 348.

Kumar, S., Jhala, Y. V., & Qureshi, Q. (2008). Habitat use by wolves in human-dominated landscapes of western India. Journal of Zoology, 276(2), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00479.x

Kumar, S., Jhala, Y. V., Qureshi, Q., & Gopi, G. V. (2020). Impacts of human activities on Indian Grey wolves. Conservation Biology, 34(3), 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13416

MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Lachman, G. B., Droege, S., Royle, J. A., & Langtimm, C. A. (2002). Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology, 83(8), 2248–2255.

Mech, L. D., & Boitani, L. (2003). Wolves: Behavior, ecology, and conservation. University of Chicago Press.

Mech, L.D., Fritts, S.H. and Paul, W.J. (1988) Relationship between winter severity and wolf depredations on domestic animals in Minnesota. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 16: 269–272.

Meriggi, A., Lovari, S. (1996). A review of wolf predation in southern Europe: does the wolf prefer wild prey to livestock? Journal of Applied Ecology, 33: 1561–1571.

Mishra, C., Van Wieren, S. E., Ketner, P., Heitkönig, I. M. A., & Prins, H. H. T. (2013). Competition between domestic livestock and wild bharal (Pseudois nayaur) in the Indian Trans-Himalaya. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 344–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00885.x

Posit Team. (2024). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. Posit Software. https://posit.co/

Sharma, A., Singh, N., Kaul, R., & Habib, B. (2015). Conservation of Indian Grey wolf: A review of challenges and strategies. Indian Journal of Ecology, 42, 124–130.

Singh, M., & Kumara, H. N. (2006). Distribution, status, and conservation of Indian Grey wolf (Canis lupus pallipes) in Karnataka. Current Science, 90(9), 1231–1236.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-08

How to Cite

Uppadhai, N. ., Sen, S. ., Lyngdoh, S. ., & Bhargava, S. . (2026). Patterns of Distribution in Context with Habitat Preference, and Conservation Threats of Indian Grey Wolf (Canis lupus pallipes) in Nauradehi Wildlife Sanctuary, Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India. Journal of Wildlife and Conservation, 2(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.54536/jwc.v2i1.5012