Enhancing Student-Teachers’ Readiness through Structured Coaching and Mentoring
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/jtel.v3i3.5100Keywords:
Mentoring, Precon, Postcon, Structured Coaching, Student-Teacher Readiness, Teacher EducationAbstract
The implementation of the Senior High School program in the Philippines has emphasized the importance of experiential learning in teacher education, particularly for student-teachers in the Technical-Vocational-Livelihood (TVL) track. Given the increasing demands in lesson planning, classroom management, and student engagement, structured coaching and mentoring are vital in enhancing pre-service teachers’ readiness for the teaching profession. This action research assessed the effectiveness of structured mentoring using Pre-Conference (PreCon) and Post-Conference (PostCon) sessions during the practicum phase. A qualitative-descriptive design was employed, drawing data from self-assessment forms, mentor evaluations, student feedback, peer observations, and mentoring logs. Findings revealed that structured coaching significantly improved student-teachers’ competencies in classroom management (M = 4.6, SD = 0.41), subject mastery (M = 4.5, SD = 0.38), and lesson planning (M = 4.2, SD = 0.35). Common challenges included lesson transitions and time management, which were mitigated through consistent mentoring strategies. Among these, PreCon and PostCon sessions were rated as the most effective (M = 4.7, SD = 0.40), fostering improved instructional delivery and self-reflection. Student-teachers perceived the mentoring process as highly beneficial in refining teaching strategies, building confidence, and addressing classroom challenges. The results underscore the importance of institutionalizing structured mentoring frameworks, particularly PreCon and PostCon, within teacher education programs to ensure professional readiness and facilitate ongoing teacher development.
References
Ambrosetti, A. (2020). Are you ready to be a mentor? Preparing teachers for mentoring pre-service teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2020v45n1.1
Baluyos, G. R., Clarin, A. S., & Bazar, J. S. (2024). Uncovering the challenges of cooperating teachers in shaping pre-service teachers: A case study. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 9(1), 1310–1316. https://ijisrt.com/assets/upload/files/IJISRT24JAN1095.pdf
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development- report
Hudson, P. (2013). Mentoring as professional development: ‘Growth for both’ mentor and mentee. Professional Development in Education, 39(5), 771–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.749415
Ingersoll, R., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311403323
Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2014). Can professional environments in schools promote teacher development? Explaining heterogeneity in returns to teaching experience. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 476–500. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713519496
Tinaytina, J. C. (2022). Relationship of master teachers’ mentoring competency, teachers’ performance and students’ academic achievement. International Journal of Research Publications, 76(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP100761220221755
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jane Delano R. Estipona

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.