Online Learning Strategies and Speaking Performance in English of Senior High School Students

Authors

  • Marie Vi G. Goc-Ong University of Southeastern Philippines, Davao City, Philippines, Faculty, Davao Doctors College Inc., Davao City, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/jir.v2i3.3356

Keywords:

Cognitive Strategies, Grammar, Online Learning Strategies, Speaking Performance

Abstract

This study sought to find the relationship between the two variables and decide which domain of online learning strategies significantly influences the students’ speaking performance in English. This study employed a descriptive-correlational method. There were 100 senior high school students involved in this study. The research instruments used were an adapted survey questionnaire and a speech task. The results showed a high mean score for the online learning strategies of students, and the students’ speaking performance was described as good. The relationship between the two variables was insignificant, and only metacognitive strategies positively influenced the students’ speaking performance. The students must learn how to use online learning strategies appropriately to overcome challenges in the online learning environment since online learning strategies might not be typical for students when delivering speaking performance tasks. Thus, teachers may teach students how to employ online learning strategies to help them improve their online learning.

References

British Council. (2015). Cognitive strategies. Teaching English, British Council. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/cognitive-strategies

Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Language teaching approaches: An overview. Teaching English as a second or foreign language, 2(1), 3-10.

Forbes, K., & Fisher, L. (2015). The impact of expanding advanced level secondary school students’ awareness and use of metacognitive learning strategies on confidence and proficiency in foreign language speaking skills. The Language Learning Journal, 46(2), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2015.1010448

Fitriani, D. A., Apriliaswati, R., & Wardah, W. (2015, September 16). A study on student’s English speaking problems in speaking performance. Neliti. https://www.neliti.com/publications/215252/a-study-on-students-english-speaking-problems-in-speaking-performance

Gani, S. A., Fajrina, D., & Hanifa, R. (2015). Students’ learning strategies for developing speaking ability. Studies in English language and education, 2(1), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v2i1.2232

Healey, D. (2019). For Students, Online Success Requires New Strategies and Habits. Practitioner to Practitioner, 10(3), 5-7. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1246655

Hu, H., & Gramling, J. (2009). Learning strategies for success in a web-based course: A descriptive exploration. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(2), 123.

Hurd, S. (2006). Towards a better understanding of the dynamic role of the distance language learner: Learner perceptions of personality, motivation, roles, and approaches. Distance education, 27(3), 303-329.

Husnawati, M. (2017). Students’ speaking performance: Some challenging factors. Ar-Raniry Repository. https://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/id/eprint/1236/2/Husnawati.pdf

Kuama, S. (2016). Students’ strategy use in the online English learning. Unpublished master’s thesis).

Lalani, F., & Li, C. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic has changed education forever. World Economic Forum.https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/coronavirus-education-global-covid19-online-digital-learning/

Liu, Y., & Feng, H. (2011). An empirical study on the relationship between metacognitive strategies and online learning behavior and test achievements. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(1), 183-187. https://education.uitm.edu.my/ajue/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/20

Matuga, J.M. (2009). Self-regulation, goal orientation, and academic achievement of secondary students in online university courses. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 4-11.

Nirmawati, L. (2015). Improving students’ speaking skill through speaking board games of grade VII of SMP N 13 Yogyakarta in the academic year of 2013/2014. UMY Repository. http://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/23783

Nunan, D. (2017). Does learner strategy training make a difference? Lenguas Modernas, 24, 123–142. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323842686_The_Role_of_Vocabulary_Knowledge_in_Speaking_Development_of_Saudi_EFL_Learners

Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. TESOL Quarterly, 24(2), 235–245. https://journal.walisongo.ac.id/index.php/vision/article/view/4791/pdf

Oxford, R. L. (2011). Strategies for learning a second or foreign language. Language teaching, 44(2), 167-180.

Syafryadin, S. (2020). Students’ Strategies in Learning Speaking: Experience of Two Indonesian Schools. Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, 9(1), 34-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.21580/vjv9i14791

Tsai, M. J. (2009). The model of strategic e-learning: Understanding and evaluating student e-learning from metacognitive perspectives. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 34-48. https://kb.psu.ac.th/psukb/bitstream/2016/11994/1/412942.pdf

Wael, A., Asnur, M. N., & Ibrahim, I. (2018). Exploring students’ learning strategies in speaking performance. International Journal of Language Education, 2(1), 65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327064619_exploring_students’learning_strategies_in_speaking_performance

Wang, Z. (2014). Developing accuracy and fluency in spoken English of Chinese EFL. English Language Teaching, 7(2), 110-118. http://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/23783

Zariski, A., & Styles, I. (2000). Enhancing student strategies for online learning: In flexible futures in tertiary teaching. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual Teaching Learning Forum (pp. 2-4). https://kb.psu.ac.th/psukb/bitstream/2016/11994/1/412942.pdf

Downloads

Published

2024-09-27

How to Cite

Goc-Ong, M. V. G. (2024). Online Learning Strategies and Speaking Performance in English of Senior High School Students. Journal of Innovative Research, 2(3), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.54536/jir.v2i3.3356