Blue Biotechnology Startups in Bangladesh: An Empirical Evidence on Opportunities Barriers, and Pathways Forward

Authors

  • M. R. Washikur Department of Genetic Engineering and Marine Biotechnology, Bangladesh Maritime University, Dhaka-1216, Bangladesh https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7410-4060
  • Sanjana Tarannum Department of Genetic Engineering and Marine Biotechnology, Bangladesh Maritime University, Dhaka-1216, Bangladesh
  • Mohammad Nazir Hossain Department of Genetic Engineering and Marine Biotechnology, Bangladesh Maritime University, Dhaka-1216, Bangladesh https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3397-1060

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/jebs.v2i1.6957

Keywords:

Blue Biotechnology, Business, Entrepreneurship, Marine, Startups

Abstract

The global blue biotechnology sector, projected to exceed $10 trillion by 2030 through marine-derived pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, and sustainable aquaculture innovations, represents an unprecedented economic frontier that Bangladesh, endowed with 118,813 km² of exclusive economic zone and unparalleled Bay of Bengal biodiversity, remains uniquely positioned to capture through strategic startup ecosystem development. This pioneering study employs a quantitative cross-sectional survey (N=223) targeting Bangladesh’s blue biotechnology stakeholders, revealing a significant paradox: 93.3% exhibit entrepreneurial fervor, yet 75.3% perceive an investment crisis as the most existential operational threat, while 96.9% affirm the sector’s viability, despite 59.2% acknowledging knowledge deficits. Chi-square analyses (p < .001) reveal age-stratified challenge perceptions, with youth decrying government support voids, mid-career professionals’ infrastructure chasms, and gender-differentiated opportunity lenses. Males prioritize seafood demand (43.4%), while females focus on raw material abundance (28.1%). Marine natural products (39.9%) and aquaculture biotech (31.4%) emerge as consensus research priorities; however, a 40-point intention-investment chasm (93% vs. 53%) signals a capital ecosystem failure. Universal endorsement (100%) of university-industry symbiosis demands immediate institutionalization. This research fills the academic void on blue biotech entrepreneurship in developing countries, delivering battle-tested policy instruments: patient-capital venture funds, shared marine biobanks, formalized tech-transfer pipelines, and hybrid business models that fuse domestic aquaculture scaling with global pharma licensing. Bangladesh confronts a binary future: squander a trillion-dollar marine inheritance through inaction, or architect a blue biotech supernova catalyzing 21st-century economic transcendence. The empirical clarion call: convert 93% entrepreneurial fire into a $10B+ GDP alchemy through the ruthless execution of the knowledge-capital-infrastructure triad.

Author Biographies

  • M. R. Washikur, Department of Genetic Engineering and Marine Biotechnology, Bangladesh Maritime University, Dhaka-1216, Bangladesh

    Student, 

    Department of Genetic Engineering and Marine Biotechnology, Bangladesh Maritime University, Dhaka-1216, Bangladesh.

  • Sanjana Tarannum, Department of Genetic Engineering and Marine Biotechnology, Bangladesh Maritime University, Dhaka-1216, Bangladesh

    Student, 

    1Department of Genetic Engineering and Marine Biotechnology, Bangladesh Maritime University, Dhaka-1216, Bangladesh

References

Agresti, A. (2007). An introduction to categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). Wiley-Interscience.

Alvedalen, J., & Boschma, R. (2017). A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 887–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694

Arrieta, J. M., Arnaud-Haond, S., & Duarte, C. M. (2010). What lies underneath: Conserving the ocean’s genetic resources. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(43), 18318–18324. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911897107

Autio, E., & Rannikko, H. (2016). Retaining winners: Can policy boost high-growth entrepreneurship? Research Policy, 45(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.002

Bartlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43–50.

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Cantamessa, M., Gatteschi, V., Perboli, G., & Rosano, M. (2018). Startups’ roads to failure. Sustainability, 10(7), Article 2346. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072346

Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3–4), 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

Collins, J., Broggiato, A., & Vanagt, T. (2018). Blue biotechnology. In Building industries at sea – ‘Blue Growth’ and the new maritime economy (1st ed.). River Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003337430-4

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

European Commission, Directorate-General for Fisheries and Maritime Affairs. (2014). Study in support of impact assessment work on blue biotechnology. European Sources Online. https://www.europeansources.info/record/study-in-support-of-impact-assessment-work-on-blue-biotechnology/

Evans, J. R., & Mathur, A. (2018). The value of online surveys: A look back and a look ahead. Internet Research, 28(4), 854–887. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-03-2018-0089

Fan, W., & Yan, Z. (2010). Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.015

Field, A. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey research methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Frese, M., Rousseau, D. M., & Wiklund, J. (2014). The emergence of evidence-based entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12094

Global Industry Analysts, Inc. (2025). Marine biotechnology – Global strategic business report. Research and Markets. https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/4911755/marine-biotechnology-global-strategic-business

Hussain, M. G., Failler, P., Karim, A. A., & Alam, M. K. (2018). Major opportunities of blue economy development in Bangladesh. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, 14(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/19480881.2018.1424321

Hyder, S., & Lussier, R. N. (2016). Why businesses succeed or fail: A study on small businesses in Pakistan. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 8(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-03-2015-0020

IBM Corp. (2020). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 27.0) [Computer software]. IBM Corp.

Islam, M. M., & Shamsuddoha, M. (2018). Coastal and marine conservation strategy for Bangladesh in the context of achieving blue growth and sustainable development goals (SDGs). Environmental Science and Policy, 87, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.05.014

Islam, M. S., Ahmed, Z., Habib, M. A., & Masud, O. (2024). Blue economy of Bangladesh and sustainable development goals (SDGs): A comparative scenario. Discover Sustainability, 5, Article 349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00551-5

Krosnick, J. A., & Presser, A. (2010). Question and questionnaire design. In P. V. Marsden & J. D. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (2nd ed., pp. 263–314). Emerald.

McHugh, M. L. (2013). The chi-square test of independence. Biochemia Medica, 23(2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2013.018

Myers, L., & Sirois, M. J. (2006). Spearman correlation coefficients, differences between. In S. Kotz, N. Balakrishnan, C. B. Read, & B. Vidakovic (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471667196.ess5050.pub2

Nosella, A., Petroni, G., & Verbano, C. (2005). Characteristics of the Italian biotechnology industry and new business models: The initial results of an empirical study. Technovation, 25(8), 841–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.002

OECD. (2013). Marine biotechnology: Enabling solutions for ocean productivity and sustainability. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264194243-en

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Pisano, G. P. (2006). Can science be a business? Lessons from biotech. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 114–124.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Presser, S., Rothgeb, J. M., Couper, M. P., Lessler, J. T., Martin, E., Martin, J., & Singer, E. (Eds.). (2004). Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires. John Wiley & Sons.

Querellou, J. (Ed.). (2010). Marine biotechnology: A new vision and strategy for Europe (Position Paper No. 15). Marine Board–European Science Foundation. http://archives.esf.org/fileadmin/Public_documents/Publications/marine_biotechnology_01.pdf

Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Crown Business.

Skvarka, J., & Farkas, C. (2013). Building a fully integrated biotech company: What it takes. IN VIVO: The Business and Medicine Report, 31(9), 1–6.

Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167

Tölle, J., & Herbst, F. (2016). The business model of biotech SMEs: How do biotech SMEs cope with the industry’s challenges? Semantic Scholar. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Business-Model-of-Biotech-SMEs-%3A-How-do-biotech-T%C3%B6lle-Herbst/a9217fc94ff680f0b69f2e43a337b1f6b6b89b22

World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053

Wright, K. B. (2005). Researching Internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3), JCMC1034. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x

Downloads

Published

2026-06-16

How to Cite

Washikur, M. R. ., Tarannum, S. ., & Hossain, M. N. . (2026). Blue Biotechnology Startups in Bangladesh: An Empirical Evidence on Opportunities Barriers, and Pathways Forward. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Business Strategies, 2(1), 72-82. https://doi.org/10.54536/jebs.v2i1.6957