A Critical Examination of Hate Speech in Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsl.v1i1.620Keywords:
Democratic Society, Fundamental Human Rights, Hate Speech, Cyber CrimeAbstract
Hate speech touches on contested issues of dignity, free expression, liberty and democracy. It can thus be argued that there is a conflict between the right to freely advocate however distasteful the idea may be and the right to be free from prejudice and discrimination. In some circumstances, speech is restrained and the right to non-discrimination is preferred over free speech. Hate speech has been used invariably to mean expression which is abusive, insulting, intimidating, harassing or which incites violence, hatred, discrimination against group identified by characteristics such as race, religion, place of birth, residence, region, language, caste, community, sexual orientation or personal convictions. The methodology adopted in this paper was doctrinal. Both primary and secondary sources were employed in carrying out this paper. The finding of the paper is that asides from Nigeria, various countries of the world have adopted some measures to deal with hate speech and other related issues. While some countries have clearly defined laws, some others find it quite unnecessary to create laws that seek to regulate hate speech as it is perceived as an infringement to the fundamental human rights of freedom of expression. This paper recommended that the existing Cyber Crimes Act and the Anti-Terrorism Act, among other pre-existing regulations cover many of the offences the new bill seek to address rather than waste valuable resources on the enactment of fresh laws to enable effective implementation and avoid a situation of plurality of laws. Perhaps one of the most effective ways of combating hate speech would be to marginalize purveyors of such speeches. In the U.K., while far-right, fascist parties like the British National Party and the racist ideas they support are not banned, mainstream British politician avoid associating openly with members of such parties. In Nigeria, on the other hand, offensive and hate speech mongers are often seen as regional and ethnic heroes.
Downloads
References
A Jideofor (2018). Should the Law be Used to Curb Hate Speech in Nigeria? Nassarawa State University, Keffi.
African (Banjul) Charter on Human and People’s Rights, adopted June 27, 1981, OAU Doc. CAB/LEG/67/3 rev. 5, 21 ILM. 58 (1982). Hereinafter referred to as “African Charter”
All India Reports SC 775. See also R v. Butler (1992). 1 SCR 452.
Arup Bhuyan v. State of Assam (2011). 3 SCC 377.
All Nigeria Law Report (NLR) (1962). 324. ACLU v. Reno (1996). 929 F. Supp 824.
Also criminalised by Criminal Code, s393; Penal Code, s59 and Newspaper Amendment Act, s4.
A.Adepegba, (2017). AuduMaikori to face Trial. Retrieved on June 19, 2017. http://punchng.com/maikori-released-by-police-to-face-trial/
American Association for the International Commission of Jurists, Siracusa Principles on the Limitation and Derogation Provisions in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1985). U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/1985/4.
A. Razaq, P. Udende, A. Ibrahim and L. Oba, (2017). Media, Politics and Hate Speech: A Critical Discourse Analysis. E Academia Journal, 243.
Article 19 v. Eritrea (2007). AHRLR 73 ACHPR
Adopted by a group of experts convened by the international human rights NGO, ARTICLE 19. (London: 1996)
African (Banjul)(June 27, 1981). Charter on Human and People’s Rights, adopted June 27, 1981, OAU Doc. CAB/LEG/67/3 rev. 5, 21 ILM. 58 (1982).
Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969). 395 US 444
B. Adetokunbo, “Impact of Military Rule on Fundamental Human Rights in Nigeria” in Okpara Okpara ed. Op. Cit. at 365.
Constitutional Rights Project v. Nigeria (2000). AHRLR 233 ACHPR 1999
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, General Recommendation 29, Discrimination Based on Descent (Sixty-first session, 2002), U.N. Doc. A/57/18 at 111 (2002). Reprinted in Compilation of General Comments and General Recommendations Adopted by Human Rights Treaty Bodies, U.N. Doc. HRIGEN1Rev.6 at 223 (2003), paras. r, s and t
Criminal Code Act (1985). Cap. C 38 LFN 2004 s. 377. 6 Nigerian Commerical Law Report (NCLR) 228.
Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.(CFRN) (1999). (as amended) Section 39
Cybercrimes Act, s26(1) (b) and (c)
Cybercrimes Act, s26.
Chavundunka v. Minister of Home Affairs (1985). WCLR 228, 6.
Constitutional Rights and Anor v. Nigeria (2000). AHRLR 227 ACHPR 1999
DPP v.Chike Obi (1961). ANLR, 1
Electoral Act, s95 and s102
Edward N (ed)The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 ed.)
Examples include the cases of The Sunday Times v. United Kingdom, (26 April 1979). Application No. 6538/74, para. 45; Mukong v. Cameroon 21 July 1994, Communication No. 458/1991, para. 9.7 (UN Human Rights Committee).
E P Guiro, (2017). Hate Speech on Social Media, Philosophia, 45(3) 957-971.
European Convention on Human Rights, adopted November 4, 1950, entered into force September 3, (1953). Hereinafter “ECHR”. There is no need for a Hate Speech Law” available @ https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2019/11/22/there-is-no-need-for-a-hate-speech-law/ Retrieved 8th January 2021
E. Neisser, ‘Hate Speech in New South Africa: Constitutional Consideration for a Land Recovering from Decades of National Repression and Violence (1994). 10, South African Journal of Human Rights, 337
Feldek v. Slovakia (12 July 2001). Application No. 29032/95, para. 56.
Guidelines for Political Rallies, Code of Conduct for Political Parties and the Nigerian Media Code of Conduct for Political Parties
Gooding v. Wilson (1972). 405 US 518 p. 522 Handyside v. United Kingdom (1976). EHRR 737 at Para 49, 1.
H.Kukah‘Hate Speech, Social Media and the (2015). Election. Retrieved on on 3rd January, 2021. pointblanknews.com/pbn/.../hate-speech-social-media-2015-election International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights(1996). UNGAR2200A (XXI) 1996 Article 19.
International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) (October 16, 1967).
I. Gigilardone, D. Gil, T. Alves and G. Martinez, (2015) Countering Online Hate Speech, UNESCO: Paris, 10
I. Gigilardone, D. Gil, T. Alves and G. Martinez, Countering Online Hate Speech(2015). UNESCO: Paris, 2015.
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights March 23, (1976). 993 UNTS
International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) October 16, 1967
Juma and Ors v. Attorney General (2003). AHRLR 179 KeHC 2003
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (March 23, 1976). 993 UNTS. Hereinafter referred to as “ICCPR”.
J. Adibe, Fayose’s Advert: Offensive or Hate Speech? adapted from conference paper presented at a roundtable on hate speech organised by the Kukah Centre and the MacArthur Foundation, Abuja, on January 27, 2015.
J. Waldron, The Harm in Hate Speech (2012). Harvard University Press: Cambridge, 87.
K.O Mrabure, ‘Counteracting Hate Speech and the Right to Freedom of Expression in Selected Jurisdction’(2016), 7, Nnamdi Azikwe University Journal of International Law and Jurisprudence, 160
Law of the Federation of Nigeria (LFN) (1990). Cap. 77. now Cap. C. 38 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004.
Law of the Federation of Nigeria (LFN)(1990). Cap 345 now Cap. P. 3 Vol. 13 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004.
Law Commission of India, Hate Speech March (2017). Report 267, 15.
Law Commission of India, Hate Speech, (March 2017). Report 267, 37.
M. L.Nnabuike, Media Law and Policy in Nigeria (2016). Malthouse Press: Lagos, 2016, 163.
M. Nowak, UN Covenant on Civil and Political Right: CCPR , (2005). Kehl Ltd: Engel Cop.
Media Rights and Anor v. Nigeria (2000). AHRLR 200 ACHPR at para 67
Mukong v. Cameroun (21 July 1994). Communication No. 458/1991, para. 9.7 (UN Human Rights Committee) Nigerian Weekly Law Report (NWLR) (1989). Pt. 116, 439.
Nigeria’s Human Rights Commission denounces Hate speech in political rallies and social media (2021). Retrieved on 3rd January, 2021 newsdiaryonline.com/nigerias-rights-commission-denounces-hate-speech-political-rallies-social-media/
OMrabure Counteracting Hate Speech and the Right to Freedom of Expression, (2016). Nnamdi Azikiwe University Journal of International Law and Jurisprudence, 17.
Pursuant to Article 45(1) of the African Charter (2002).Signed at the 32nd Session of the African Commission on Human and People’s Rights in Banjul, Gambia. October 2002.
Rex v AdemaArubi (1935). 11 Nigeria Law Report (NLR) 27, Ogbuagu v Police (1953) 2 Nigeria Law Reports NLR 139.
Ramesh v. Union of India (1988).
Red Alert on Hate Speech Prevalence in Nigeria, (2021).Retrived on 3rd January 2021. http://intervention.ng/6220/
R v. Butler (1992). SCR 452, 1
R v. Amalgamated Press (1965). All NLR 199
RefahPartisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey, (13 February 2003). Application Nos. 41340/98, 41342/98, 41343/98 and 41344/98 (European Court of Human Rights), para. 58
R v. Big M. Drug Mart Ltd (1985). 1 SCR 295. 331
R v. Oakes (1986). SCR 103, 1, 138-139.
See, for example, Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. United Kingdom, (13 July 1995), Application No. 18139/91 (European Court of Human Rights).
Social and Economic Rights Action Centre (SERAC) and Another v Nigeria (2001). 60 AHRLR (ACHPR 2001)
SALC Litigation Manual Series (2021). Freedom of Expression: Litigating cases of limitations of the exercise of freedom of speech and opinion. Retrieved on 5th January 2021. http://www.southernafricalitigationcentre.org/1/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Freedom-of-Expression-Manual.pdf
See C. Oko, (1978 - 1988). Constitutionality of Nigerian Sedition Law Arthur Nwankwo v The State. NJR, 3, 186 - 187.
Sunday Times v. UK (26 April 1979). Application No. 6538/74, para. 45.
Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015). All India Reports 1523
State of Maharasthra v.SangharajDamodarRupawate (2010). SCC 398, 7.
Section 45(1)(a) Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (1999). as amended Article 19.
Siracusa Principles (n 21) at 47. Principle 43.
S. Rodney, Free Speech in an Open Society (New York: Knopf, 1992), 319
Siracusa Principles (n 21) at 47. Principle 29.
See, for example, Lingens v. Austria, (8 July 1986). Application No. 9815/82, para. 39 (European Court of Human Rights).
Scanlen and Others v. Zimbabwe (2009). AHRLR 289 ACHPR 2009
Sahara Reporters, (2021). Police arrest Kemi Olunloyo over Blogpost accusing Pastor of Adultery. Retrieved on 8th January, 2021. http://saharareporters.com/2017/03/17/police-arrest-kemi-olunloyo-over-blog-post-accusing-pastor-adultery
See Declaration of the Principles of Freedom of Expression in Africa note 207 at 45
See Defining Defamation, Principles on Freedom of Expression and Protection of Reputation (2021). Retrieved on 8th January, 2021. http://www.ipu.org/splz-e/sfe/definition.pdf
Sunday Times v. United Kingdom(n 21) at 46.
SERAC v. Nigeria (2001). 60 AHRLR (ACHPR 2001).
T. Mendel, (2021). Restricting Freedom of Expression: Standards and Principles. Being paper for meeting hosted by the UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of opinion ad expression. Retrieved on 8th January, 2021. http://www.law-democracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/10.03.Paper-on-Restrictions-on-FOE.pdf
The rights and reputation of others and the protection of national security, public order, public health and public morality.
Thappar v. State of Madias (1950). SCR 594. 603
Toby Mendel (n 21) at 47.
The Centre of Information Technology report of the occurrence of the use of Hate Speech in Nigeria. (July 2016). Retrieved on 2021 from http://intervention.ng/4100
The Increasing Problem of Hate Speech in Nigeria (2020). Retrieved 8th January 2020 https://www.brookings.edu/blog/africa-in-focus/2018/10/02/should-the-law-be-used-to-curb-hate-speech-in-nigeria/The Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen, as approved by the National Assembly of France. (August 26, 1789) Article 16 ‘any society in which no provision is made for guaranteeing of rights...... has no Constitution’.
The United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination – General Recommendations on Combatting Racist Hate Speech (2013). CERD/C/GC/35. Council of Europe Committee of Ministers Recommendation No. (1997). 20 on Hate Speech (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 30 October 1997at the 607th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). Article 19
Unlike in civil defamation where communication of the defamatory matter to the plaintiff alone will not constitute publication. The defendant must have communicated it to a third party.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Idachaba Martins Ajogwu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
