From Structure to Meaning: Gendered Communication in Philippine Political Landscapes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsl.v4i1.4436Keywords:
Genderlect Communication Style, Political Discourse, Structural Analysis, Transformational-Generative GrammarAbstract
This study examines sentence structures of Chomsky and communication styles of male and female senators through Tannen’s Genderlect Theory. The research reveals that male senators predominantly use simple sentences (26 occurrences), complex sentences (14 occurrences), and compound sentences (7 occurrences). In contrast, female senators favor varied structure, including compound-complex sentences (7 occurrences), simple sentences (23 occurrences), complex sentences (6 occurrences), and compound sentences (5 occurrences). Furthermore, the frequencies of Genderlect styles in male and female senators reveal distinct communication. The Information vs. Feelings is the most frequently occurring category, with a total of 111 occurrences. Furthermore, the Conflict vs. Compromise follows, with a total of 50 occurrences. In the Status vs. Support, female senators recorded 10 occurrences compared to six occurrences among male senators. A similar trend is observed in Advice vs. Understanding where female senators registered seven occurrences, significantly higher than the one occurrence among male senators. In addition, the Orders vs. Proposals shows a relatively balanced distribution, with six occurrences among male senators and four among female senators. Lastly, Independence vs. Intimacy recorded the least number of occurrences, with only one instance, observed in male senators. The findings reveal that both genders adjust their linguistic choices based on political context, demonstrating flexibility in communication strategies. The study concludes that gender significantly influences discourse patterns, with male senators prioritizing assertiveness and status assertion, while female senators emphasize inclusivity and engagement. Future research should explore how these linguistic differences affect public perception, media representation, and policy outcomes in political communication.
Downloads
References
Angelakis, A., Inwinkl, P., Berndt, A., Ozturkcan, S., Zelenajova, A., & Rozkopal, V. (2024). Gender differences in leaders’ crisis communication: a sentiment-based analysis of German higher education leaderships’ online posts. Studies in Higher Education, 49(4), 609-622.
Atkinson, M. L., & Windett, J. H. (2019). Gender stereotypes and the policy priorities of women in Congress. Political Behavior, 41, 769-789.
Buarqoub, I. (2019). Language barriers to effective communication. Redalyc. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/279/27962177008/html/
Calude, A. S. (2023). The linguistics of social media: An introduction. Taylor & Francis.
Cameron, D. (2023). Language, sexism, and misogyny. Taylor & Francis.
ChenFeng, J., Kim, L., Wu, Y., & Knudson‐Martin, C. (2017). Addressing culture, gender, and power with Asian American couples: Application of socio‐emotional relationship therapy. Family Process, 56(3), 558-573.
Crittendon, S. L. (2024). A seat at the table: Examining the communicative strategies of African American female politicians (Doctoral dissertation, Regent University).
Determ. (2024, May 31). How social media is transforming political communication. Determ. https://determ.com/blog/how-social-media-is-transforming-political-communication/
Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (n.d.). Goal 16. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal16
Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (n.d.). Goal 5. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal5
Ellis, R. J. (2021). Presidential lightning rods: The politics of blame avoidance. University Press of Kansas.
Engelbert, L. H., Van Elk, M., Kandrik, M., Theeuwes, J., & Van Vugt, M. (2022). The effect of charismatic leaders on followers’ memory, error detection, persuasion, and prosocial behavior: A cognitive science approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(3), 101656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101656
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis. In The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 9-20). Routledge.
Gbadamosi, E. (2024). The audacity of hope: Examining the influences of stable persona construction on political discourse in the United States. Persona Studies, 10(3), 1-16.
Guirguis, M., & van Doorn-Harder, N. (2022). The emergence of the modern Coptic papacy. American University in Cairo Press.
Halliday, M. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press Inc.
Hansson, S. (2015). Discursive strategies of blame avoidance in government: A framework for analysis. Discourse & Society, 26(3), 297-322.
Harris, R. A. (2021). The linguistics wars: Chomsky, Lakoff, and the battle over deep structure. Oxford University Press.
Heavey, C., Simsek, Z., Kyprianou, C., & Risius, M. (2020). How do strategic leaders engage with social media? A theoretical framework for research and practice. Strategic Management Journal, 41(8), 1490-1527.
Ikrambayevna, S. D. (2024). Classification of functions of communicative strategy and tactics in political communication. Miasto Przyszłości, 50, 548-553.
Jacobi, T., & Schweers, D. (2017). Justice, interrupted: The effect of gender, ideology, and seniority at Supreme Court oral arguments. Virginia Law Review, 103, 1379-1417.
Johnson, A., & Boylorn, R. M. (2015). Digital media and the politics of intersectional queer hyper/in/visibility in between women. Liminalities, 11(1). https://liminalities.net/11-1/
Jones, J. J. (2016). Talk “like a man”: The linguistic styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992–2013. Perspectives on Politics, 14(3), 625-642.
Kahne, J., & Bowyer, B. (2018). The political significance of social media activity and social networks. Political communication, 35(3), 470-493.
Kang, S. (2024). Decoding Korean political talk: From data to debate. Taylor & Francis.
Kim, A. S., & Del Prado, A. (2019). It’s time to talk (and listen): How to have constructive conversations about race, class, sexuality, ability & gender in a polarized world. New Harbinger Publications.
Lei, C. K. (2019). The multiplicity of identification and agency in Asian rhetoric: The analysis of the US Congress speeches of Asian female political leaders through the feminine rhetorical style (Master’s thesis, San Diego State University).
Lewis, A. (2022, October 26). Good leadership? It all starts with trust. Harvard Business Publishing. https://www.harvardbusiness.org/good-leadership-it-all-starts-with-trust/
Lusk, J. (2023, March 22). The power of words: How language shapes our perception of the world. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/power-words-how-language-shapes-our-perception-world-james-lusk/
McCoy, J. (2024, September 9). What is grammar and why does it matter? Workmind - Blog. https://workmind.ai/blog/what-is-grammar/
McCusker, M. (2015, August 20). The political significance of social media. August. https://www.weareaugust.ca/blog/the-political-significance-of-social-media/
McGee, P. (2023, August 25). The language women use in the workplace and what it means. Stem Women. https://www.stemwomen.com/the-language-women-use-in-the-workplace-and-what-it-means
Mezmir, E. A. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: An overview of data reduction, data display, and interpretation. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(21), 15-27.
Murray, S. E., & Starr, W. B. (2018). Force and conversational states. In New work on speech acts (pp. 202-236). Oxford University Press.
Nugent, M. K. (2019). When does he speak for she? Men representing women in Parliament (PhD dissertation, Rutgers University, Political Science).
Parmanand, S. (2020). Duterte as the macho messiah: Chauvinist populism and the feminisation of human rights in the Philippines. Review of Women’s Studies, 29(2), 1-30.
Perloff, R. M. (2021). The dynamics of political communication: Media and politics in a digital age. Routledge.
Prior, M. (2019). Hooked: How politics captures people’s interest. Cambridge University Press.
Rastelli, S. (2024). Plain language: A psycholinguistic approach. Taylor & Francis.
Robinson, C. M. (2024). The power of her voice: An interpretative phenomenological study exploring the career experiences of women middle-level leaders (Doctoral dissertation, Antioch University).
Saaida, M. (2023). The role of social media in shaping political discourse and propaganda. 3, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10841870
Sahly, A., Shao, C., & Kwon, K. H. (2019). Social media for political campaigns: An examination of Trump’s and Clinton’s frame building and its effect on audience engagement. Social Media + Society, 5(2), 2056305119855141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119855141
Samanci, E. S. (2010). Teaching simple and compound sentences with computers (Master’s thesis, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
Shaw, S. (2020). Women, language and politics. Cambridge University Press.
Smith, J. (2019). Gendering political leadership: A case study of the UK, examining media and voter perceptions (Doctoral dissertation, Birkbeck, University of London).
Speechly, A. K. (2019). Writing for mobile media: The influences of text, digital design, and psychological characteristics on the cognitive load of the mobile user.
Talbot, M. (2019). Language and gender. John Wiley & Sons.
Talbot, M. (Ed.). (2019). Language and power in the modern world. Edinburgh University Press.
Tannen, D. (2015). Genderlect styles [Electronic]. In A first look at communication theory (10th ed., pp. 384–395). McGraw-Hill. https://www.afirstlook.com/docs/genderlect.pdf
Taubaldiyev, M., Kulmanov, S., Amirbekova, A., Azimkhan, Y., Zhonkeshov, B., Utemissova, G., & Ospanov, Y. (2024). Terminology in political discourse as a means of language representation of the image of the country. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 186-198. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.10117
Teimouri, E. (2024). Persuasive linguistic strategies in news media: A pragmatic study of CNN and Fox News headlines and the rhetorical grammar components of their associated texts (Master’s thesis, UIS).
The role of syntax in effective communication. (2024, September 16). Ryteup. https://ryteup.com/blog/the-role-of-syntax-in-effective-communication/
Van Dijk, T. (2009). Society and discourse: How social context influences text and talk [Online]. Cambridge University Press.
Wajdi, M., & Asrumi, A. (2024). Analysing the slogan “LUBER” in Indonesia’s 2024 general election: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Pragmatics Studies, 3(1), 53-65.
Walsh, C. (2016). Gender and discourse: Language and power in politics, the church and organisations. Routledge.
Wolfsfeld, G. (2022). Making sense of media and politics: Five principles in political communication. Routledge.
Yu, X. (2021). A study on the role of sentence structure analysis in English learning. OALib, 08(09), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107859
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Daniel Geranco, Evangeline Alvarez, Shiryl Ytoc
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
