Enhancing the Implementation of Common Service Facility (CSF) Under DAR-Agrarian Reform Community Connectivity and Economic Support Services (ARCCESS) Program in Ocampo, Camarines Sur, Philippines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsard.v2i1.7561Keywords:
Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries, Common Service Facility, DAR-ARCCESS Program, Farm Mechanization, Philippines, Program Implementation, Rural DevelopmentAbstract
This study evaluated the implementation of the Common Service Facility (CSF) under the Department of Agrarian Reform–Agrarian Reform Community Connectivity and Economic Support Services (DAR-ARCCESS) Program in Ocampo, Camarines Sur. The CSF comprised farm machinery and equipment, including four-wheel-drive tractors, a hauling truck, and hand tractors, utilized by Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries Organizations (ARBOs) to enhance members’ economic productivity. A descriptive-evaluative research design was employed, involving officers and members from selected ARBOs. Data were collected through structured questionnaires and focus group discussions. Results indicated that the implementation of the CSF was generally perceived as highly acceptable in terms of ease of operation, cost-effectiveness, and accessibility. However, availability of units and policy implementation were rated as moderately acceptable. Key challenges identified included limited-service coverage, low rental competitiveness, scheduling constraints, inadequate financial record-keeping, insufficient maintenance practices, and lack of trained or permanent operators. To address these issues, the study recommends strengthening promotional strategies, increasing member engagement, developing second-line operators, enforcing operational policies such as job order documentation, enhancing operator capacity through continuous training, and institutionalizing regular financial reporting. These measures are expected to improve the efficiency, sustainability, and overall impact of the CSF under the DAR-ARCCESS Program.
References
AFMA Primer Accessed December 2013 at hhttp://nafc.da.gov.ph/afma/primer
AFMech Law Accessed December 2013 at http//.www.gov.ph/2013/06/05republic-act-no-10601/.
Agricultural and Fisheries Modernization Act of (AFMA) 1997. Accessed in December 2013 at http://nafc.da.gov.ph/afma/ra 8435.pdf.
AMDP (Agricultural Mechanization Development Program). 2002. AMDP brochure. Institute of Agricultural Engineering, College of Engineering and Agro-Industrial Technology, University of the Philippines at Los Baños.
A.T Mosher, ‘‘Some Policy Issues and Research Needs’’ Experience in Farm Mechanization in South East Asia. Edited by Herman Southworth and Milton Berneth, page 335, 1974, published by the Agricultural Department Council, 630 Fifth Avenue, New York.
Bautista, E. U., 2003. Mechanizing rice production and postharvest operations in the Philippines: present status, prospects, and challenges. Philippine Agricultural Mechanization Bulletin, 10(2), 27-39.
Clarke, L.J., 2000. Strategies for Agricultural Mechanization Development: The Roles of Private Sector and the Government, Available at https://ecommons.corn-=ell.edu/bitsream/handle/
Davis (1986), “Theory of Reasoned Action,” Retrieved August 24, 2018, from http://www.cios.org/encyclopedia/persuasion/Gtheory_1reasoned.htm
Dela Cruz, R. SM. 2010. Consolidation and Large-Scale Mechanization of Corn Farms: The Case of Quirino and Isabela. PHilMech Journal. Vol. 2, No.1. Philippine Center for Postharvest Development and Mechanization. CLSU Compound, Science City of Muñoz, Nueva Ecija.
Dela Cruz, R.S., and S. B Bobier 2016.Farm Power Available Utilization in Philippine Agriculture, PostHarvest, and Mechanization Journal page 1-16.
Department of Agriculture. 2014. Rice and Corn Mechanization and Post-harvest Masterplan FY2014-2022. The Government of the Philippines. Manila.
Department of Agriculture. 2011. Rice mechanization: On-farm and Postharvest Mechanization Programs (2011-2016). The Philippines.
Erlang, A.K. (1929), “Queuing Theory,” Retrieved August 24, 2018, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queueing_Theory.
Medrano et al., Rice Combine Harvester: Its Effects to the Livelihood of Rice
Field Tenants, Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, Vol.4, No.4 November 2016.
PCARRD-DOST. 2009. Agricultural Mechanization in the Philippines, Los Baňos, Laguna
PCARRD-DOST (Philippine Council for Agriculture, Forestry and Natural
Resources Research and Development of Science and Technology), 2002.
R & D Status and Directions (2000 and beyond) Agricultural Engineering, Los Baňos, Laguna.
Philippine Council for Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Resources and Development 2009. Agricultural Mechanization in the Philippines Book Series No. 179/2009.
PhilMech website Accessed in December 2013 at http://www.philmech.gov.ph.
Rogers, Everett (2003), “Adoption & Diffusion Innovation Theory”, Retrieved August 24, 2018 from https:// extensinaus.com.au/extension- practice/diffusion of innovations theory adoption and diffusion.
Rodulfo, VA.; Amongo, RM, RM, C.; Larona MV.L., Status of Philippine Agricultural Mechanization and Its Implication for Global Competitiveness. Phil. Agric. Mech. Bull., 5(1), 3-13, 1998.
Rostow, Whitman (1996), “Modernization Theory,” Retrieved August 24, 2018, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modernization_theory
UPLB-BAR. National Farm Mechanization Needs Survey and Analysis Report: Terminal Report. Los Baňos, Laguna: Institute of Agricultural Engineering, CEAT, UPLB, 2001.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fortunato M. Balbis

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.