Science Teachers Preparedness for Artificial Intelligence in Practical Instruction Control and Delivery to Oyo State Public Secondary Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajirb.v3i1.3488Keywords:
Automation, Artificial Intelligence, Science, Teachers, Practical, Instructions, School, Examinations, Readiness and Delivery SystemAbstract
The dispatch of practical instructions to schools and supervisors prior to the actual conduct of the practical examination over the years has not received the same level of attention as that given to the movements of people and goods and, therefore, is prone to challenges. However, the process could be automated using artificial intelligence. Previous studies have investigated the effects of automation on the control and delivery of goods in the transport management sector, mostly in the Western world. Therefore, this study assessed science teachers’ challenges and readiness for artificial intelligence in practical instruction control and delivery systems. The study adopted ex-post facto design and used one hundred science teachers as participants. Science Teacher Readiness for Automated Practical Instruction Control and Delivery (r = 0.83) was used to collect data. The data collected were analysed descriptively. There are more male (73%) science teachers than female (27%). 84% of the respondent listed cost as one of the challenges, and 83% of the respondents indicated resistant to change and technical difficulties, ethical issue 67% and integration with existing system 65%) 64 The science teachers are moderately ready 64% while 24% are lowly ready and 12% are highly ready for the deployment of automated practical instruction control and delivery system. Artificial intelligence for science practical instruction delivery has greater benefits than the manual way of delivery; however, science teachers are ready for its deployment despite its challenges. Therefore, efforts should be geared towards overcoming the inherent challenges so that the benefits can be fully enjoyed.
Downloads
References
Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305
Ajeyalemi, D. (2011). Practical work in school science: Are the aims and objectives being achieved? In Memorial lecture in 52nd Annual Conference of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria (pp. 3–15).
Cukurova, M., & Luckin, R. (2018). Measuring the impact of emerging technologies in education: A pragmatic approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53803-7_81-1
Fadzil, H. M., & Saat, R. M. (2013). Phenomenographic study of students’ manipulative skills during transition from primary to secondary school. Sains Humanika, 63(2), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v63.2013
Hinneh, J. T. (2017). Attitude towards practical work and students’ achievement in biology: A case of a private senior secondary school in Gaborone, Botswana. IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM), 13(4), 06–11.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. https://curriculumredesign.org/wp-content/uploads/AIED-Book-Excerpt-CCR.pdf
Jinadu, A. T. (2024). Physics laboratory companion for senior secondary schools. In press.
Jinadu, A. T., & Balogun, R. T. (2020). Availability and adoption of online learning platforms during COVID-19 lockdown in Nigeria. Diverse Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(5), 8–12.
Jinadu, A. T., Oyaremi, M. K., & Rufai, M. D. (2021). Assessment of the Oyo State Teaching Service Commission interactive learning platforms during COVID-19 lockdown period in Nigeria. Interdisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.51986/ijer-2021.vol3.01.04
Luckin, R., & Cukurova, M. (2019). Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences-driven approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 2824–2838. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12861
Naqvi, A. (2020). Artificial intelligence for audit, forensic accounting, and valuation: A strategic perspective. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119601906
Okam, C. C., & Zakari, I. I. (2017). Impact of laboratory-based teaching strategy on students’ attitudes and mastery of chemistry in Katsina Metropolis, Katsina State, Nigeria. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 6(1), 112–121.
Otunla, A. O., & Jinadu, A. T. (2014). University lecturers’ adoption of new educational technologies for effective service delivery in undergraduate medical education. Journal of Educational Media and Technology, 18(1), 48–54.
Schwichow, M., Zimmerman, C., Croker, S., & Hartig, H. (2016). What students learn from hands-on activities? Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21320
Seufert, S., Guggemos, J., & Sailer, M. (2021). Technology-related knowledge, skills, and attitudes of pre- and in-service teachers: The current situation and emerging trends. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106552
Sotiriou, S., Bybee, R. W., & Bogner, F. X. (2017). PATHWAYS–A case of large-scale implementation of evidence-based practice in scientific inquiry-based science education. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(2), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n2p8
Ubulom, W. J., & Wokocha, K. (2017). Readiness and acceptability of computer-based test (CBT) for post-university matriculation examinations (PUME) among urban and rural senior secondary school students in Rivers State. International Journal of Innovative Social & Science Education Research, 5(3), 51–60.
Wardat, Y., Tashtoush, M. A., AlAli, R., & Jarrah, A. M. (2023). ChatGPT: A revolutionary tool for teaching and learning mathematics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), em2286. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13272
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Afeez T. Jinadu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.