Fabrication and Performance Evaluation of an Engine-Operated Weeding Machine for Wheat plantation

Authors

  • Degefa Woyessa Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Asella Agricultural Engineering Research Center, Asella, Ethiopia, P.O. Box 06 Asella, Ethiopia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6326-8608
  • Adesoji M. Olaniyan Department of Agricultural and Bioresources Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Federal University Oye –Ekiti, Ikole-Ekiti Campus, Ikole-Ekiti 370001, Ekiti State, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajirb.v2i2.1500

Keywords:

Cost of weeding, Energy consumption, Field efficiency, Plant damage, Performance, Wheat, Weeding machine, Weeding efficiency

Abstract

Wheat crops are severely hampered by weeds, which also significantly reduce productivity. Manual weeding requires a lot of time and effort. Chemical weed management is harmful to both the environment and people. Today’s agriculture sector needs non-chemical weed management to meet consumer demand for premium food items and pay close attention to food safety. The objectives of the study was to evaluate the performance of an-engine operated weeder by evaluating the weeding efficiency, plant damage, effective field capacity, field efficiency, fuel consumption, performance index, energy consumption, and cost economics of engine operated weeder in wheat crop. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design and evaluation was conducted at three weeder forward speeds (1.5, 2, and 2.5 km/hr), two depths of operation (from 0 to 20 and from 0 to 40 mm), and three levels of soil moisture content (9.4, 12.34 and 15.25%). The performance of the weeder was found to be optimum at 15.25 percent soil moisture content with 0 to 40 mm depth of operation at a forward speed of 1.5 km/hr. The results revealed that maximum weeding efficiency of 90.1 percent was obtained with lower plant damage of 3.31 percent whereas the effective field capacity, field efficiency, fuel consumption, performance index, and energy consumption were found to be 0.052 ha/hr, 85.99%, 0.41 l/hr, 276.78 ha/hp, and 481.71 MJ/ha, respectively. The analysis revealed that forward speed, depth of operation, and soil moisture had significant effects on weeding efficiency, plant damage, effective field capacity, and fuel consumption at P<0.05 level of significance. The cost of weeding per hectare were 758 ETB/ha and 1920 ETB/ha for engine-operated weeders and traditional weeding methods, respectively. Based on the performance results, it can be concluded that the weeding machine is efficient, effective, and economically viable option with high scope for acceptability among small and medium scale farmers

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

lizadeh, M.R., (2011). Field performance evaluation of mechanical weeders in the paddy field.Scientific Research and Essays, 6(25):5427-5434.

Biswas, H.S. and Yadav, R.,(2004). Animal drawn weeding tools for weeding and intercultural in black soil. Agricultural Engineering Today, 28(1):47–53

CSA(Central Statistical Agency).(2013). Report on area and production of major crops meher season. Report on Area and Production of Major Crops Meher Season. Addis Ababa.

CSA(Central Statistical Agency).(2015). Report on area and production of major crops, private peasant holdings, and meher season. Statistical Bulletin 278. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

CSA (Central Statistical Agency).(2016). Report on area and production of major crops, private peasant holdings, meher season, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

FAO(Food and Agriculture Organization)., 2015. Agricultural Production Statistics.FAOSTAT. Rome.

Gavali, M. and Kulkarni, S.,(2014). Comparative Analysis of Portable Weeder and Powers Tillers in the Indian Market. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 3(4):11004-11013.

Hegazy, R.A., Abdelmotaleb, I.A., Imara, Z.M. and Okasha, M.H.,(2014). Development and evaluation of small-scale power weeder. Misr J. Ag. Eng, 31(3): 703-728.

Karale, D.S., Khambalkar, V.P., Bhende, S.M. and Wankhede, P.S.,(2008). Energy economic of small farming crop production operations. World J. of Agric.Sciences, 4(4): 476-482.

Kankal, U., Now, R. and Palled, V. K.,(2014). Optimization of operational parameters and performance evaluation of self-propelled weeder for field crops. International Journal of Applied Agricultural & Horticultural Sciences, 5(1):56–60.

Kebede Desta., (2000). Weed control methods used in Ethiopia. Animal power for weed control. Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Kepner, R. A., Bainer, R., and Barger, E. L., (2005). Principle of Farm Machinery. 3rd Edition. New Delhi: CBS Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd.

Lopez-Granados.F.,(2011). Weed detection for site-specific weed management, mapping, and real-time approaches. Weed Research, 51: 1–11.

Manuwa, S.I., Odubanjo, O.O., Malumi, B.O. and Olofinkua, S.G.,(2009). Development and performance evaluation of a row-crop mechanical weeder. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 4(4):236-239.

Minot, N., Warner, J., Lemma, S., Kasa, L., Gashaw, A. and Rashid, S., (2019). The wheat supply chain in Ethiopia:Patterns,Trends,and Policy Options. Gates Open Res, 3(174):174.

MOA(Ministry of Agriculture).(2012). Animal and Plant Health Regulatory Directorate. Crop variety register, Issue No. 15. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Mohammad, A., Baghestani, M. A., Soufizadeh, S. and Bagherani, N., (2007). Weed control and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield under application of 2, 4-D plus carfentrazoneethyl and florasulam plus flumetsulam. Crop Protection, 26(12): 1759-1764.

Monalisha, S. and Goel, A.k., (2017). Development of a Multipurpose Power Weeder. The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 4(6): 3527–3531.

Nkakini, S.O., Akor, A.J, and Ayotamuno, J.,(2009). Design and Fabrication of engine-powered roto-weeder. Journal of Agricultural Engineering and Technology(JAET), 17(1):7–16

Nkakini, S.O., Akor, A.J., Ayotamuno, J., Ikoromari, A. and Efenudu, E.O., (2010). Field performance evaluation of manual operated petrol engine powered weeder for the tropics. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa & Latin America, 41(4):68-73

Olukunle, J., and Oguntunde, P. G., (2006). Design of a row crop weeder. Conference on International Agricultural Research for Development.Tropentag 2006 University of Bonn.

Padole., (2007). Performance Evaluation of Rotary PowerWeeder. Agricultural Engineering Today, 31(3and4): 30-33.

Rangapara Dineshkumar, J., (2014). Development of mini tractor operated picking type pneumatic plante. r Anand agricultural university.

Shehzad, M.A., Nadeem, M.A. and Iqbal, M., (2012). Weed control and yield attributes against post-emergence herbicides application in wheat crop, Punjab, Pakistan. Global Advanced Research Journal of Agricultural Science, 1(1):7-16.

Tajuddin, A., (2006). Design, development, and testing of engine-operated weeder. Agricultural Engineering Today, 30(5): 25–29.

Varshney, R.A., Tiwari, P.S., Narang, S. and Mehta, C., (2005).Databook for agricultural machinery design.Book no. CIAE, 2004/1, CIAE, Bhopal (M.P.) India.

Verma, A. and Victor, V. M., (2003). Design and development of power-operated rotary weeder for wetland paddy. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia and Latin America, 34(4): 27–29.

Yadav, R. and Pund. S., (2007). Development and ergonomic evaluation of manual weeder. Agricultural Engineering International: The CIGRE Journal. Manuscript PM 07 022, IX.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-23

How to Cite

Woyessa, D., & M.Olaniyan, A. M. (2023). Fabrication and Performance Evaluation of an Engine-Operated Weeding Machine for Wheat plantation. American Journal of IR 4.0 and Beyond, 2(2), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajirb.v2i2.1500