Strategic Intervention Material (SIM) on Senior High School Student Learning in Stocks and Bonds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v2i4.2182Keywords:
Strategic Intervention Material, Mathematics Education, Senior High School, General MathematicsAbstract
Strategic Intervention Material (SIM) is a type of instructional material that is designed to be targeted and effective for students who are struggling with a particular concept or skill. SIM typically includes a variety of activities and resources that are designed to help students learn and master the material. This study investigated the effectiveness of Strategic Intervention Material (SIM) in improving the academic achievement of grade 11 students in distinguishing stocks and bonds. A quasi-experimental design with a non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design was used. Sixty-four (64) participants were selected as subjects of the study. Mean and t-tests were used as tools in the analysis of data. The results revealed that SIM significantly improved the academic achievement of students in distinguishing stocks and bonds. The experimental group achieved a significantly higher mean score on the posttest than the control group. Additionally, the experimental group achieved a better gain score than the control group. This study suggests that SIM is an effective instructional strategy for improving student achievement in distinguishing stocks and bonds. Further research is needed to investigate the effectiveness of SIM in other subjects and with other student populations.
Downloads
References
Abuda, B. F., Balazo, G. F., Orque, J., Cabili, M.C., & Maestre, M. F. A. (2019). Struggling Learners’ Mathematics Achievement Level using Quick Response Embedded Strategic Intervention Material. International Journal in Information Technology in Governance, Education and Business, 1(1), 39-45.
Abucejo, M. B., Cruz, L. B., & Santos, J. P. (2021). The effectiveness of strategic intervention material (SIM) in improving the mathematics achievement of Grade 7 students. International Journal of Scientific Research, 10(2), 17-22.
Adonis, A. B. (2020). Contextualized Strategic Intervention Materials in Grade 9 Mathematics. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 850-868.
Balazo, G. F. O. (2021). Struggling Learners’ Achievement Level Using Electronic Strategic Intervention Material In Mathematics (ESIMATH). American Journal of Agricultural Science, Engineering, and Technology, 5(2), 207-214.
Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory: prentice-hall Englewood cliffs, NJ.
Barredo, K., & Joan, K. (2019). Effect of strategic intervention material (SIM) on academic performance: Evidence from Students of Science VI. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(10), 292-295.
Bornaa, C. S., Abugri, M. A., & Iddrisu, A. B. (2023). Comparative Study of Traditional Face-to-Face and E-Learning Modes of Teaching Senior High School Geometry. American Journal of Education and Technology, 2(2), 10-14.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press
Cerujano, J. (2019). Effectiveness of the Developed Strategic Intervention Materials in Mathematics 9 as Perceived by Select Junior High School Teachers and Students in Nasugbu East District. Ascendens Asia Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, 3(2B).
Diaz, A. M., Santos, J. P., & Cruz, L. B. (2020). The effectiveness of strategic intervention material (SIM) in improving the mathematics achievement of Grade 9 students. International Journal of Education and Research, 9(12), 1-10.
Department of Education (2012). National Achievement Test Results 2012. Department of Education, Philippines.
Gersten, R., Compton, D., Haymond, K., & Dimino, J. (2019). A meta-analysis of the effects of strategic intervention material (SIM) interventions on mathematics achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 31(1), 269-306.
Lessani, A., Yunus, A. S. M., & Abu Bakar, K. B. (2017). Traditional teaching methods in mathematics: A review of literature. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 32(12), 1285-1297.
National Center on Response to Intervention (NRTI). (2010). Response to intervention: The RTI approach to learning and behavior. Retrieved from https://www.rti4success.org/
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2020). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Schwerdt, G., & Wuppermann, A. C. (2014). Lecture-based teaching versus inquiry-based teaching: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 1-20.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Oswald II E. Zabala
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
