Technologies Intervention to Reduce Rice Post Harvest Loses in Bangladesh

Authors

  • Mashrat Jahan
  • Atiar Rohman Molla
  • Jaba Rani Sarker

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajaset.v3i1.37

Keywords:

Rice;, Technologies adoption, Postharvest loss and Probitmodel

Abstract

The use of technologies in the reduction of post-harvest losses of rice at farm level is advocated in this paper. The research discusses the conditions under which producers can benefit (e.g, minimizing the losses, ensuring quality, reducing gender inequality, time & labor saving etc) from technological innovations and to identify the gaps and opportunities to address the post-harvest based technology needs in the improvement of post-harvest loses and reducing the drudgery. In post-harvest activities the quality of the harvested crop, the degree of losses incurred and the efficiency of the operations and hence, overall costs are affected by factors related to the respondents age, education, family size, occupation, cropping area, institutional access to credit, the way of handling by male & female and the technology used. Purposive sampling technique was used to obtain data from 270 Bangladeshi Rice farmers. To estimate the casual impact of technology adoption propensity score matching methods and probit model is utilized to assess the results robustness that estimate the true welfare effect of technology adoption by controlling for the role on production and adoption decisions. Results show that adoption of improved technology gives higher returns to the farmers (5.62%) than the traditional farmers, though the former is more capital intensive than the latter. Quantity of operated area and access to credit are the two most important factors that contribute to adoption. With increasing Dependency Ratio and Cost of mechanical power, farmers tend to adopt less. The overall result from this paper generally confirms the potential direct role of Post-Harvest technology adoption on improving rural household welfare, as higher production tends to higher incomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mashrat Jahan

Department of Agricultural Economics
Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development
Bangabandhu Sheikh MujiburRahman Agricultural University
Gazipur, Bangladesh.

Atiar Rohman Molla

Departments of Agricultural Economics
Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology
Bangladesh Agricultural University
Mymensingh, Bangladesh.

Jaba Rani Sarker

Department of Agricultural Economics
Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development
Bangabandhu Sheikh MujiburRahman Agricultural University
Gazipur, Bangladesh.

References

Adesina A.A.,&Baidu-Forson J. (1995). Farmers’ Perception and Adoption of New Agricultural Technology: Evidence from Analysis in Burkina Faso and Guinea, West Africa. Agricultural Economics, 13, 1–9.

AdesinaA.A.,&Zinnah M.M. (1993). Technology Characteristics, Farmers’ Perceptions and Adoption Decisions: A Tobit Model Application in Sierra Leone. Agricultural Economics, 9, 297–311.

Asfaw,S.,&Shiferaw,B.(2010).Agricultural technology Adoption and Rural Poverty: Application of an Endogenous Switching Regression for Selected East African Countries, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics Nairobi, Kenya.

Bala, B. K., HaqueM. A., HossainM. A., &Majumdar, S.(2010). Post-harvest loss and technical efficiency of rice, wheat and maize production system: Assessment and measures for strengthening food security, National Food policy Capacity Strengthening Programme, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Becker, S. O. &Ichino, A. (2002).Estimation of average treatment effect based on propensity score.Stata Journal, 4, 358-377.

Dehejia, H.R., &Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score matching methods for non-experimental causal studies. The Review of Economics Statistics, 84(1), 151-161.

FAO & APO (2006).Post-harvest management of fruits and vegetables in the Asia Pacific region.Hirakawacho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-0093, Japan and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, VialedelleTerme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy.

Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J.,& Todd, P. (1998).Characterizing selection bias using experimental data.Econometrica, 66 (5), 1017-1098.

Joshi G.,&Pandey S. (2006). Farmers’ perceptions and adoption of modern rice varieties in Nepal, Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 45, 171-186.

Mottaleb, K. A., Mohanty, S., & Nelson, A. (2014). Factors influencing hybrid rice adoption: a Bangladesh case. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

NkamleuG.B.,& Adesina A.A. (2000). Determinants of Chemical Input Use in Periurban Lowland Systems: Bivariate Probit Analysis in Cameroon. Agricultural Systems, 63, 111–121.

Rahman S. (2008). Determinants of Crop Choices by Bangladeshi Farmers: A Bivariate Probit Analysis. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 5(1), 29-42.

Shiyani R.L., Joshi P.K., Asokan M., &Bantilan M.C.S. (2002). Adoption of Improved Chickpea Varieties: KRIBHCO Experience in Tribal Region of Gujarat, India. Agricultural Economics,27, 33–39.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-18

How to Cite

Jahan, M., Molla, A. R., & Sarker, J. R. (2019). Technologies Intervention to Reduce Rice Post Harvest Loses in Bangladesh. American Journal of Agricultural Science, Engineering, and Technology, 3(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajaset.v3i1.37