Making Sense of Verbal Bullying in Early Childhood: Preschool Teachers’ Perspectives and Reported Practices in Athens, Greece
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ijhbss.v1i1.8531Keywords:
Early Childhood Education, School–Family Cooperation, Teacher Beliefs, Verbal BullyingAbstract
This study explored preschool teachers’ beliefs, interpretations, and reported practices regarding verbal bullying in early childhood settings in Athens, Greece. A qualitative research design was adopted, and fourteen preschool teachers employed in public and private nursery schools participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The findings revealed substantial variability in teachers’ conceptualizations of verbal bullying, particularly in relation to intentionality, repetition, and power imbalance. Although most participants recognised the emotional harm associated with verbal aggression and expressed strong willingness to intervene, definitional ambiguity appeared to influence how incidents were identified and addressed. Teachers predominantly attributed verbally aggressive behaviors to family environment, emphasizing parental modeling and relational climates at home. Empathy-based dialogue and classroom discussion emerged as the principal reported forms of intervention. At the same time, although all participants acknowledged the importance of school–family cooperation, many described reluctance to engage parents because of anticipated defensiveness or denial. The study highlights the need for enhanced professional development focused on conceptual clarity, early identification of repeated victimization, and structured communication frameworks between schools and families. Given the formative importance of early childhood in shaping peer relations and social behaviour, strengthening prevention strategies at this stage may contribute meaningfully to reducing later bullying trajectories. Research on bullying has focused mainly on primary and secondary education, leaving verbal bullying in Greek preschool settings underexplored. Verbal aggression warrants particular attention because it can be subtle, mistaken for developmentally typical conflict, and become embedded in early peer relationships. This qualitative study examined how 14 preschool teachers from public and private schools in Athens conceptualised verbal bullying and described their responses to it. Semi-structured interviews and reflexive thematic analysis were used to obtain context-sensitive accounts from teachers with varied professional experience. The findings represent participants’ reported perceptions and practices rather than independently observed classroom behaviours. Teachers recognised the emotional harm caused by verbal aggression but applied the defining criteria of intentionality, repetition, and power imbalance inconsistently. They primarily attributed such behaviour to family influences and reported using empathy-based dialogue and classroom discussion. Although school–family cooperation was considered important, anticipated parental defensiveness often discouraged communication. The study extends understanding of how verbal bullying is interpreted within the specific cultural and educational context of Greek preschools. Despite the small, geographically limited convenience sample and reliance on self-report, the findings identify a need for clearer institutional protocols and prevention-oriented professional development addressing bullying recognition, inclusive intervention, documentation, and constructive family engagement.
Downloads
References
Andreou, E., Didaskalou, E., &Vlachou, M. (2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of a curriculum-based anti-bullying intervention program in Greek primary schools. Educational Psychology, 33(5), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.785052
Bowes, L., Maughan, B., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., &Arseneault, L. (2010). Families promote emotional and behavioural resilience to bullying: Evidence of an environmental effect. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(7), 809–817. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02216.x
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Cassidy, T. (2009). Bullying and victimization in school children: The role of social identity, problem-solving style, and family and school context. Social Psychology of Education, 12(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-008-9066-y
Craig, W. M., &Pepler, D. J. (2003). Identifying and targeting risk for involvement in bullying and victimization. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48(9), 577–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370304800903
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Garandeau, C. F., Vartio, A., Poskiparta, E., &Salmivalli, C. (2016). School bullies’ intention to change behaviour following teacher interventions: Effects of empathy arousal, condemning of bullying, and blaming of the perpetrator. Prevention Science, 17(8), 1034–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0712-x
Hamarus, P., &Kaikkonen, P. (2008). School bullying as a creator of pupil peer pressure. Educational Research, 50(4), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880802499779
Khanolainen, D., Hall, A., Craig, W., Trach, J., Noetzel, J., Starosta, L., Dhungana-Sainju, K., Bjärehed, J., Thornberg, R., Bayram-Özdemir, S., Bjärehed, M., Görzig, A., Wright, M., Betts, L., Swearer, S., & Hymel, S. (2026). An international investigation of variability in teacher perceptions of bias-based bullying and their likelihood of intervening. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 8, 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-025-00285-6
Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Pelletier, M. E. (2008). Teachers’ views and beliefs about bullying: Influences on classroom management strategies and students’ coping with peer victimization. Journal of School Psychology, 46(4), 431–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.07.005
Landers, E., McBrayer, J. S., Pannell, S., Cleveland, R., Daniels, D., &Krah, M. (2025). Anti-bullying measures and initiatives in an online setting: Educator survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(4), Article 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22040480
Landers, E., Howerter, C. S., & Harris, K. (2024). An analysis of teachers’ reports of bullying incidents. Critical Questions in Education, 15(3), 236–249.
Monks, C. P., & Smith, P. K. (2006). Definitions of bullying: Age differences in understanding of the term, and the role of experience. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(4), 801–821. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005X82352
Moore, T. E., &Pepler, D. J. (2006). Wounding words: Maternal verbal aggression and children’s adjustment. Journal of Family Violence, 21(1), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-9007-x
Nikolaou, G., &Samsari, E. (2016). Attitudes of native and immigrant students towards school bullying in Greece. Multicultural Education Review, 8(3), 160–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/2005615X.2016.1189731
O’Brien, S. O., Campbell, M., &Whiteford, C. (2024). A review of factors affecting teacher intervention in peer bullying incidents: A call for more nuanced professional development. Journal of School Violence, 23(3), 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2023.2289117
Olweus, D. (1994). Bullying at school: Basic facts and effects of a school-based intervention program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35(7), 1171–1190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01229.x
UNESCO. (20019). Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and bullying. UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54675/QSBD7181
Van Niejenhuis, C., Huitsing, G., &Veenstra, R. (2020). Working with parents to counteract bullying: A randomized controlled trial of an intervention to improve parent-school cooperation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 61(1), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12522
Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Huitsing, G., Sainio, M., &Salmivalli, C. (2014). The role of teachers in bullying: The relation between antibullying attitudes, efficacy, and efforts to reduce bullying. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 1135–1143. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036110
Vlachou, M., Andreou, E., Botsoglou, K., &Didaskalou, E. (2011). Bully/victim problems among preschool children: A review of current research evidence. Educational Psychology Review, 23(3), 329–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9153-z
Yoon, J. S. (2004). Predicting teacher interventions in bullying situations. Education and Treatment of Children, 27(1), 37–45.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Despoina Papadopoulou, Ilias Vasileiou (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.