Carrier Safety Scoring Under Measurement Instability: From CSA Percentile Volatility to Route-Level Risk Allocation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajise.v5i3.8448Keywords:
Carrier Safety Scoring, Inspection Exposure, Measurement Reliability, Motor Carrier Regulation, Route-Level Risk Allocation, Stochastic Vehicle RoutingAbstract
Carrier safety percentile scores generated by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s Safety Measurement System inform enforcement prioritization, insurance underwriting, and, increasingly, automated freight-assignment decisions. Several independent strands of research document that these percentiles behave inconsistently for carriers with limited inspection histories. This article connects that documented inconsistency to a specific decision a route-level or lane-level risk-allocation system must make: whether to treat every published percentile with equal statistical confidence. Drawing together evidence on carrier size, inspection frequency, longitudinal score movement, and carrier-level aggregation, the article argues that a below-threshold CSA percentile carries a different statistical status than an above-threshold one, and proposes this distinction as a design requirement for automated routing systems that already handle other forms of scenario uncertainty. The article specifies the data, unit of observation, and modeling approach a future empirical study would need to test this claim, framing the present contribution as the conceptual groundwork for that test.
Downloads
References
Cantor, D. E., Corsi, T. M., & Grimm, C. M. (2008). Determinants of motor carrier safety technology adoption. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44(5), 932–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2007.03.001
Cantor, D. E., Corsi, T. M., & Grimm, C. M. (2017). The impact of new entrants and the new entrant program on motor carrier safety performance. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 97, 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.11.005
Cantor, D. E., Corsi, T. M., Grimm, C. M., & Özpolat, K. (2010). A driver focused truck crash prediction model. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 46(5), 683–692.
Cantor, D. E., Corsi, T. M., Grimm, C. M., & Singh, P. (2016). Technology, firm size, and safety: Theory and empirical evidence from the U.S. motor-carrier industry. Transportation Journal, 55(2), 149–167.
Doskach, H. (2026a). Building a profitable trucking company in the U.S. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
Doskach, H. (2026b). Mitigating the U.S. truck driver shortage through AI-driven route optimization. Scientia. Technology, Science and Society, 3(5), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.59324/stss.2026.3(5).04
Doskach, H. (2026c). Safety and compliance in commercial transportation. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
Kim, S., Park, A., & Wagner, S. M. (2024). Owner-operator experience and violations in trucking: The mixed role of perceived justice. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 188, 103642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103642
Knipling, R. R., Hyten, C., & Singer, J. (2011). Safety management in small motor carriers (CTBSSP Synthesis 22). Transportation Research Board, National Academies Press.
Lack, C. D., Berkow, K. S., & Gao, Y. (2021). Insights into motor carrier crashes: A preliminary investigation of FMCSA inspection violations. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 155, 106105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106105
Lianeas, T., Nikolova, E., & Stier-Moses, N. E. (2018). Risk-averse selfish routing. Mathematics of Operations Research, 44(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2017.0913
Miller, J. W. (2017). Discrete time hazard modeling of large motor carriers’ longitudinal CSA performance. Transportation Journal, 56(2), 107–139. https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.56.2.0107
Miller, J. W. (2020). Why are larger motor carriers more compliant with safety regulations? Transportation Journal, 59(1), 28–72. https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.59.1.0028
Miller, J. W., Golicic, S., & Fugate, B. (2017). Developing and testing a dynamic theory of motor carrier safety. Journal of Business Logistics, 38(2), 96–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12149
Miller, J. W., Golicic, S. L., & Fugate, B. S. (2018). Reconciling alternative theories for the safety of owner-operators. Journal of Business Logistics, 39(2), 101–122.
Miller, J. W., & Saldanha, J. P. (2016). A new look at the longitudinal relationship between motor carrier financial performance and safety. Journal of Business Logistics, 37(3), 284–306.
Miller, J. W., & Saldanha, J. P. (2018). An exploratory investigation of new entrant motor carriers’ longitudinal safety performance. Transportation Journal, 57(2), 163–192. https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.57.2.0163
Moses, L. N., & Savage, I. (1994). The effect of firm characteristics on truck accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 26(2), 173–179.
Scott, A., Balthrop, A., & Miller, J. W. (2021). Unintended responses to IT-enabled monitoring: The case of the electronic logging device mandate. Journal of Operations Management, 67(2), 152–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1110
Scott, A., & Nyaga, G. N. (2019). The effect of firm size, asset ownership, and market prices on regulatory violations. Journal of Operations Management, 65(7), 685–709. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1059
Toumazis, I., & Kwon, C. (2016). Worst-case conditional value-at-risk minimization for hazardous materials transportation. Transportation Science, 50(4), 1174–1187. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2015.0639
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Orlova Natalya Gennadyevna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
