Kinetics Modeling of Biogas Production from Market Waste Inoculated with Abattoir Waste

Authors

  • James Kamau Mbugua Luis Environmental Care Ltd, P.O. BOX 14627-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
  • Damaris Nduta Mbui Department of Chemistry, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
  • Joseph Mugambi.Mwaniki Department of Chemistry, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
  • Gabriel Andati Waswa South Eastern Kenya University, Department of Physical Science, P.O. Box 170-90200 Kitui, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajise.v3i1.1880

Keywords:

Rumen Fluid, Biogas, Kinetics, Modeling, Modified Gompertz Model, Market Waste

Abstract

The anaerobic digestion process is a waste management method that is driven by microbes and therefore, it’s vital to understand the basic operation kinetics. This study demonstrates the kinetic study for twenty market wastes inoculated with rumen fluid at mesophilic temperature. The substrates consisted of blended market wastes inoculated with rumen fluid for a seven days hydraulic retention time. The experimental data obtained were used for kinetic studies by fitting the data to Linear, Exponential, Gaussian, Logistics, and Modified Gompertz kinetic models. The results obtained showed that high cumulative biogas was observed in the market wastes mixed sample at 3500 mL followed by sweet potato, potato, and banana wastes at 2000 mL and 1700 mL respectively. The un-inoculated wastes fruit and vegetable wastes mixtures produced 300 mL, blank rumen 700 mL while co-digestion of waste with rumen matter produced 3500 mL of biogas. The kinetic evaluation of the biogas generation data showed that the coefficient of determination (R2) was in the following ranges for all the twenty market wastes, linear model: 0.5478 - 0.9973, exponential model: 0.9099 - 0.9984, Gaussian model: 0.879-0.9932, Logistic Growth model: 0.9602 – 0.9963 and Modified Gompertz model: 0.9987 – 0.9999 respectively. Therefore, the Modified Gompertz model yielded high-accuracy result. Further, biogas generation from these models showed high accuracy with 25.96 mL/g cumulative biogas in contrast to the experimental yields of 23.58 mL/g with slight deviations of 2.87 %.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ackerman, F. (2000). Waste management and climate change. Local Environ, 5(2), 223–229.

Awosusi, A. O. (2010). Assessment of environmental problems and methods of waste management in Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria. Afr Res Rev, 4(3b), 331–343.

Bacenettia, J., Ducab, D., Negria, M., Fusic, A., Fialaa, M. (2015). Mitigation strategies in the agro-food sector: the anaerobic digestion of tomato purée by-products. An Italian case study. Sci Total Environ, 526(1), 88–97

Bhada-Tata, P., Hoornweg, D. A. (2012). Waste generation. In: Urban development series knowledge papers. World Bank group, 8-12.

Bong, C. P. C., Lim, L. Y., Lee, C. T., Ho, W. S., Klemeš, J. J. (2017). The Kinetics for Mathe-matical Modelling on the Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Waste-A Review. Chem. Eng. Trans., 61, 1669–1674.

Budiyono, I. N., Widiasa, S. J., Sunarso, O. (2010). The Kinetic of Biogas Production Rate from Cattle Manure in Batch Mode. International Journal of Chemical and Biological Engineering, 10(1), 68-75

Cecchi, F., Pavan, P., Alvarez, J. M., Bassetti, A., Cozzolino, C. (1991). Anaerobic Digestion of Municipal Solid Waste: Thermophilic vs. Mesophilic Performance at High Solids. Waste Management & Research., 9(1), 305-315.

Chand, M. Upadhyay, B. P., Maskey, R. (2012). Biogas: option for mitigating and adaptation of climate change. Lap Lambert Academic Publ, Germany.

Chand, M., Upadhyay, B., Maskey, R. (2011). Biogas option for mitigating and adaptation of climate change. Ren Sym Comp. 1.

Clemens, H., Bailis, R., Nyambane, A., Ndungu, V. (2018). Africa biogas partnership program a review of clean cooking implementation through market development in East Africa. Energy Sustain Dev, 46,23–31

Das, A., & Mondal, C. (2015). Comparative Kinetic Study of Anaerobic Treatment of Thermally Pretreated Source-Sorted Organic Market Refuse. The Journal of Engineering, 2015, 1-14.

De Gioannis, G., Muntoni, A., Cappai, G., Milia, S. (2009). Landfill gas generation after mechanical biological treatment of municipal solid waste. Estimation of gas generation rate constants. Waste Manage. 29, 1026–1034.

Elizabeth Funmi, A., Abiodun Suleiman, M., Inioluwa Deborah, O. (2021). Biogas production as energy source and strategy for managing waste and climate change. SN Appl. Sci. 3, 34.

Ghatak, M. D., Mahanta, P. (2014). Comparison of kinetic models for biogas production rate from saw dust. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 3(7), 248 – 254.

Gunorubon, A. J., Woyinbrakemi, I. P., Adeloye, O. M. (2021). Kinetics and Reactor Model of Biogas Production from Abattoir Waste (Cow Dung). Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 6(3), 2021, 49-58.

Hoo, P. Y., Hashim H. & Ho W. S. (2018) Opportunities and challenges: landfill gas to biomethane injection into natural gas distribution grid through pipeline. J Clean Prod 175, 409–419.

Kamau, J. M., Mbui, D. N., Mwaniki, J. M., Mwaura, F. B. (2020). Lab Scale Biogas Production from Market Wastes and Dagoretti Slaughterhouse Waste in Kenya. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Research, 8(1),12-21

Kumar, S., Mondal, A. N., Gaikward, S. A., Devotta, S., & Singh, R. N. (2004). Qualitative assessment of methane emission inventory from municipal solid waste disposal sites: a case study. Atmos. Environ., 38, 4921–4929.

Lo, H. M., Kurniawan, T. A., Sillanpaa, M. E. T., Pai, T. Y. & Chiang, C. F., (2010). Modelling biogas production from organic fraction of MSW co-digested with MSWI ashes in anaerobic bioreactors. Bioresources Technology, 101, 6329-6335.

Mbugua, J. K., Kinyua, A., Mbui, D. N., Kithure, J. L., Wandiga, S. O., & Waswa, A. G. (2022). Microbial Fuel Cell Bio-Remediation of Lambda Cyhalothrin, Malathion and Chlorpyrifos on Loam Soil Inoculated with Bio-Slurry. American Journal of Environment and Climate, 1(1), 34–41.

Ministry of Environment and Forestry. (2021). National Sustainable Waste Management Policy.

Nopharatana, A., Pullammanappalli, P. C., Clarke, W. P. (2007) Kinetics and dynamic modelling of batch anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste in a stirred reactor. Waste Management, 27, 595–603.

Oladepo, O. W., Ilori, M. O. & Taiwo, K, A. (2014). Assessment of the waste generation and management practices in Nigerian food industry: towards a policy for sustainable

Pages, D. J., Pereda, R. I., Lundin, M. and Sarvari, H. I. (2011). Co-Digestion of Different Waste Mixtures from Agro-Industrial Activities: Kinetic Evaluation and Synergetic Effects. Bioresource Technology, 102, 10834- 10840

Rea, J. (2014). Kinetic Modeling and Experimentation of Anaerobic Digestion, Massachu-setts Institute of Technology

Riagbayire, F., & Nayem, Z. (2023). Biogas: An Alternative Energy Source for Domestic and Small-Scale Industrial Use in Nigeria. American Journal of Innovation in Science and Engineering, 2(1), 8–16.

Sensoneo. (2020, January). The biggest waste producers worldwide: Sensonseo Global Waste Index 2019. https://sensoneo.com/sensoneo-global-waste-index-2019/ Accessed from 17 Jun 2020.

Shete, M. B., & Shinkar, D. N. (2017). Anaerobic Digestion of Dairy Industry Waste Water-Biogas Evolution-A Review.

The World Bank. (2021). Battling Kenya’s Plastic Waste: Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2021/03/11/battling-kenya-plastic-waste-young-kenyan-woman-transforming-waste-into-sustainable-and-affordable-building-materials.

Turner, D. A., Williams, I. D., & Kemp S. (2015). Greenhouse gas emission factors for recycling of source-segregated waste materials. Resour Conserv Recycl, 105, 186–197.

UNEP. (2022). International Day of Zero Waste 2023.Retrieved from https://www.unep.org/events/un-day/international-day-zero-waste-2023

Velázquez-Martí, B., W. Meneses-Quelal, O., Gaibor-Chavez, J., & Niño-Ruiz, Z. (2019). Review of Mathematical Models for the Anaerobic Digestion Process. IntechOpen.

Yusuf, M. O. L., Debora, A., Ogheneruona, D. E. (2011). Ambient temperature kinetic assessment of biogas production from co-digestion of horse and cow dung. Res. Agric. Eng., 57(3), 97-104.

Zhang, L., Peng, B., Wang, L. & Wang, Q. (2022). Potential of anaerobic co-digestion of acidic fruit processing waste and waste-activated sludge for biogas production. Green Processing and Synthesis, 11(1), 1013-1025.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-04

How to Cite

Mbugua, J. K., Mbui, D. N., Mwaniki, J. M., & Waswa, G. A. (2024). Kinetics Modeling of Biogas Production from Market Waste Inoculated with Abattoir Waste. American Journal of Innovation in Science and Engineering, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajise.v3i1.1880