Reflection on Albanian Legislation Related to the Resolution of Electoral Disputes and Its Approximate with International Practices and Standards

Authors

  • Andon Kume Faculty of Political Science and Law, Aleksander Moisiu University, Durrës, Albania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajiri.v1i3.827

Keywords:

Legislation, Electoral Dispute, Albanian, International Standads

Abstract

Issues related to the Resolution of Electoral Disputes in the Albanian legislation began to be addressed only after the change of the government system, in the early 90s. The Constitution of the Republic of Albania, approved on November 28, 1998, created the necessary legislative basis for dealing with these issues in accordance with international legal standards. According to the Albanian legislation the Electoral Administration Zone Commissions and the Central Election Commission are responsibly the administrative review of complaints and appeals. The Electoral College as an ad hoc electoral court-has the responsibility to judge the electoral appeals. The Albanian legal framework related to the Resolution of Electoral Disputes is developed having as their main objective the respect of the standards that condition equality in the right to appeal, transparency and increased effectiveness in the administration and adjudication of complaints and appeals.International observers have evaluated positively the efforts and results achieved in the legislative process for the drafting of the legal framework for the administrative review and trial of electoral complaints and appeals in Albania.The developments in the Albanian electoral legislation for the Resolution of Electoral Disputes are guided by the recommendations given by the international observers of the OSCE/ODIHR and the standards set by the Venice Commission.The changes in the Albanian legislation for the Resolution of Electoral Disputes have as their main objective the respect of the standards that condition equality in the right to appeal, transparency and increased effectiveness in the administration and adjudication of complaints and appeals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ellena, K., Shein, E., & Vickery, C., (2015). Electoral justice/election dispute resolution Judicial independence & integrity. https://www.ifes.org/issues/electoral-justice-election-dispute-resolution

Kovick, D., Young, J.H., (2011). Alternate Dispute Resolution Mechanisms” In International Foundation for Electoral Systems. Guidelines for Understanding, Adjudicating, and Resolving Disputes in Elections (GUARDE). Edited by Chad Vickery (United States of America: IFES, 2011), 229 https://www.ifes.org/sites/default/files/migrate/guarde_final_publication_0.pdf

Kadagidze, N., & Tskhakaia, S., (2019). Research Analysis of Electoral Dispute Resolution. Project “Reform of the Electoral Practice in Georgia”. Council of Europe. https://www.coe.int/en/web/electoral-assistance/-/presentation-of-a-research-on-election-dispute-resolution-in-georgia

Kamali. Y., & Porshikhali, S., (2019). A Theoretical Analysis of Resolution Mechanisms of the Post-Electoral Disputes; with a brief glance at Iran. Research Letter of Political Science, 14(3), 87-126. https://www.sid.ir/en/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=795640

Robert Dahl and Michael Clegg(2011). Legal Frameworks for Effective Election Complaints Adjudication Systems. In International Foundation for Electoral Systems, Guidelines for Understanding, Adjudicating, and Resolving Disputes in Elections (GUARDE). Edited by Chad Vickery. United States of America: IFES, 102

Sharma. I., (2016). Report on Regional Workshop on 21-22 July, 2016 Kathmandu, Nepal. Electoral Dispute Resolution and Electoral Justice. https://nepal.ec-undp-electoralassistance.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2018/12/ec-undp-jtf-nepal-resources-publications-electoral-dispute-resolution-and-electoral-justice.pdf

Special Notes

ACE Election Integrity - ACE Electoral Knowledge Network. https://aceproject.org/main/english/ei/ei.htm

Amicus curiae brief for the European court of human rights in the case of Mugemangango v. Belgium. Opinion No. 957 / 2019. https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2019)021-e

Council of Europe “Electoral dispute resolution-Toolkit for strengthening electoral jurisprudence”, June 2020. https://rm.coe.int/electoral-dispute-resolution/16809f0007

Constitution of the Republic of Albania,

All are equal before the law.

No one may be unjustly discriminated against for reasons such as gender, race, religion, ethnicity, language, political, religious or philosophical beliefs, economic condition, education, social status, or ancestry.

No one may be discriminated against for reasons mentioned in paragraph 2 whether reasonable and objective legal grounds do not exist.

Council of Europe “Electoral dispute resolution-Toolkit for strengthening electoral jurisprudence”, June 2020. https://rm.coe.int/electoral-dispute-resolution/16809f0007

Code of good practice in electoral matters. Guidelines and explanatory report. Opinion no. 190/2002 p.39-41. https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/CDL-AD(2002)023rev.aspx.

European commission for democracy through law (Venice commission). Report on election dispute resolution. Opinion no. 913/2018. https://www.te.gob.mx/Electoral Justice: -International IDEA. (2010). https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/chapters/electoral-justice-handbook/electoral-justice-handbook-overview.pdf

IFES (2011) Guidelines for Understanding, Adjudicating and Resolving Disputes in Elections (GUARDE)https://www.ifes.org/sites/default/files/migrate/guarde_final_publication_0.pdf

International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (2010) Electoral Justice: The International IDEA Handbook. p.2. https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/electoral-justice-handbook.pdf

https://aceproject.org/ace-en/topics/lf/lfb12/lfb12a/lfb12a02/mobile_browsing/onePag

https://aceproject.org/ace-en/topics/lf/lfb12/lfb12a/lfb12a04/mobile_browsing/onePag.

https://aceproject.org/ace-en/topics/lf/lfb12/lfb12a/lfb12a05/mobile_browsing/onePag

OSCE/ODIHR, Denis Petit (2000) Resolving Election Disputes in the OSCE area: Towards a Standard Election Dispute Monitoring System (Warsaw: ODIHR, 2000), 10-11. https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/b/b/17567.pdf

vota_elections/media/files/991d5f13f5071d1.pdf

Law No. 7556, dated 4.2.1992 “On the elections of the People’s Assembly of the Republic of Albania”

Article 49

The decisions of the district election commissions can be appealed to the Central Election Commission within 3 days of their announcement.

The Central Election Commission examines the complaints and takes a relevant decision within 3 days.

Article 50

Against the decisions of the Central Election Commission, an appeal can be made to the Supreme Court within 3 days of their announcement.

The Supreme Court examines the appeal and within 3 days gives a final decision, which it announces immediately.

The decisions of the Supreme Court that are given on appeals about the results of the elections, are made known to the Mandates Commission of the new People’s Assembly.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-18

How to Cite

Kume, A. (2022). Reflection on Albanian Legislation Related to the Resolution of Electoral Disputes and Its Approximate with International Practices and Standards. American Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation, 1(3), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajiri.v1i3.827