Betwixt and Between-Weaving Industry of Bangladesh Under Structural Transformation: An Empirical Study on Narsingdi District

Authors

  • Rowshon Ara Romke Assistant Professor, Department of Social Science, American International University-Bangladesh (AIUB), Bangladesh Author
  • Rafat Taqi Tahmid Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, American International University-Bangladesh (AIUB), Bangladesh Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajdsi.v1i1.8336

Keywords:

Dual Livelihood Transitions, Handloom Industry, Livelihood Inequality, Power Loom, Structural Transformation Technological Divergence

Abstract

The diffusion of industrialization has impacted negatively on the livelihood of the handloom weavers in Bangladesh because people were overwhelmed by the production of the power loom industry. The paper aims to explore how the technological and structural transformation has driven handloom weavers to the verge of extinction. To delve into the intricacies of the issue, both qualitative and quantitative methods were employed. A total of 56 weavers were surveyed and two case studies were conducted in the Narsingdi district. The review examines the effects of technological diffusion in the distribution of income, asset ownership and livelihood trajectories. The results indicate that the power loom sector has significantly substituted the productivity and income of handloom weavers. The ongoing limitation associated with access to capital, the digital divide and insufficient institutional backing sustain the socio-economic inequality between weavers, which is in line with the attributes of an intra-industry dual economy. Through applying dual sector and structural transformation theories to the artisanal industries, the paper has shown that technological diffusion in the traditional sectors can create divergence rather than convergence in livelihoods. The implications of these findings on inclusive industrial policy, financial inclusion policy and targeted technological upgrading in informal rural industries are important.

Author Biography

  • Rowshon Ara Romke, Assistant Professor, Department of Social Science, American International University-Bangladesh (AIUB), Bangladesh

    Dr. Rowshon Ara Romke is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Social Science at the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, American International University–Bangladesh (AIUB).

References

Ahmed, M. U. (1999). Development of small-scale industries in Bangladesh in the new millennium: Challenges and opportunities. Asian Affairs, 21(1), 1–15.Asian Development Bank. (2019). Microfinance and SME development in South Asia. Asian Development Bank.

Bakht, Z. (1998). Job opportunities and business support (JOBS) program: Growth potentials of small and medium enterprises. Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies.

Banarjee, S., Muzib, M. M., & Sharmin, S. (2014). Status of handloom workers and causes of their migration: A study in handloom industry of tangail district, Bangladesh. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(22), 157–162.

Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. (2018). Bangladesh handloom census 2018. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics.

Chowdhury, N. (1989). Bangladesh’s handloom economy in transition: A case of unequal growth, structural adjustment and economic mobility amid laissez-faire markets: A synthesis. The Bangladesh Development Studies, 17(1–2), 1–22.

Ghosh, S. K., & Akter, M. S. (2005). Handloom industry on the way of extinction: An empirical study over the predominant factors. BRAC University Journal, 2(2), 1–12.

Herrendorf, B., Rogerson, R., & Valentinyi, Á. (2014). Growth and structural transformation. In P. Aghion & S. N. Durlauf (Eds.), handbook of economic growth (Vol. 2, pp. 855–941). Elsevier.

International Finance Corporation. (2020). Financial inclusion for micro and small enterprises. International Finance Corporation.

Islam, M. K., Hossain, M. E., & Ghosh, B. C. (2013). Cost–benefit analysis of handloom weaving industry in kumarkhali upazila of kushtia district, bangladesh. Development Compilation, 9(1), 63–72.

Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School, 22(2), 139–191.

Mezzadri, A. (2017). The sweatshop regime: Labouring bodies, exploitation, and garments made in India. Cambridge University Press.

Rahman, M. M. (2013). Prospects of handloom industries in pabna, bangladesh. Global Journal of Management and Business Research: G Interdisciplinary, 13(5), 9–17.

Rodrik, D. (2016). Premature deindustrialization. Journal of Economic Growth, 21(1), 1–33.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-015-9122-3

Shaw, T. (2015). A study of the present situation of the traditional handloom weavers of varanasi, uttar Pradesh, India. International Research Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3), 48–53.

UNESCO. (2020). Creative economy outlook. UNESCO.

United Nations Industrial Development Organization. (2018). Industrial development report 2018: Demand for manufacturing—Driving inclusive and sustainable industrial development. United nations industrial development organization.

World Bank. (2021). World development report 2021: Data for better lives. World Bank.

Zohir, S. C. (1996). An assessment of industrial policy in Bangladesh: What policies are we talking about? Bangladesh institute of development studies.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

How to Cite

Betwixt and Between-Weaving Industry of Bangladesh Under Structural Transformation: An Empirical Study on Narsingdi District. (2026). American Journal of Development Studies and Innovations, 1(1), 27-39. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajdsi.v1i1.8336