Structuring the Decision-Making Process Using Quantitative Options Valuation

Authors

  • Ahmed Fouda University of Manchester, Alliance Manchester Business School, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajebi.v3i2.2525

Keywords:

Decision-Making Process, Risk Assessment, Uncertainty Management, Project Valuation, Optimization Techniques

Abstract

This study focuses on enhancing decision-making processes in the construction industry by investigating quantitative decision-making models. The construction industry is known for its diverse projects and inherent risks. Effective decision-making is crucial for project success, but it faces challenges due to various factors. The research explores biases and heuristics in decision-making, specifically in entrepreneurial and managerial contexts, with a focus on two biases: overconfidence and representativeness. Data collection involved surveys administered to entrepreneurs and managers in prominent industrial sectors. The surveys measured the levels of overconfidence and representativeness in decision-making. Additionally, the study examined commonly used decision-making models in construction, including multi-criteria decision analysis, decision support systems, decision trees, and mathematical optimization techniques. The objective was to gain insights into applying quantitative models and improve the understanding of decision-making processes in construction projects. The survey achieved a response rate of 54%, and participating managers were categorized based on their two-digit Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes, specifically in the 1300, 3400, 3500, 3600, and 3800 categories. Rigorous statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate potential response bias. Comparing usable responses to non-respondents using chi-square tests, no significant evidence of bias was found (χ^2 (4) = 3.973, p = .59). Moreover, a further analysis explored potential response bias across the broader set of five two-digit SIC categories, and again, no significant evidence of bias was observed (χ^2 (5) = 1.782, p = .878). The findings of this study contribute to the improvement of decision-making in construction projects and provide valuable insights into the practical application of quantitative models. By addressing biases and exploring effective decision-making approaches, this research aims to enhance project success within the complex construction industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Araújo, L. L. F., Saldanha, M. C. W., Gohr, C. F., & Nascimento, G. H. P. (2022). Improvement factors of constructability and occupational safety on project life cycle phases. Automation in Construction, 138, 104227.

Asiedu, R. O., & Adaku, E. (2020). Cost overruns of public sector construction projects: a developing country perspective. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(1), 66-84.

Bahadorestani, A., Naderpajouh, N., & Sadiq, R. (2020). Planning for sustainable stakeholder engagement based on the assessment of conflicting interests in projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118402.

Campos-Guzmán, V., García-Cáscales, M. S., Espinosa, N., & Urbina, A. (2019). Life Cycle Analysis with Multi-Criteria Decision Making: A review of approaches for the sustainability evaluation of renewable energy technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 104, 343-366.

Costa, V. G., & Pedreira, C. E. (2023). Recent advances in decision trees: An updated survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(5), 4765-4800.

Darko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Ameyaw, E. E., Owusu, E. K., Pärn, E., & Edwards, D. J. (2019). Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction. International Journal of Construction management, 19(5), 436-452.

Ek, K., Mathern, A., Rempling, R., Rosén, L., Claeson-Jonsson, C., Brinkhoff, P., & Norin, M. (2019). Multi-criteria decision analysis methods to support sustainable infrastructure construction. In Proceedings of the IABSE Symposium.

Frau, L. (2022). The Impact of Top Management Support on the Behavioral Intention to Adopt Information Systems: A Literature Review. Available at SSRN 4284854.

Fischhoff, B., & Broomell, S. B. (2020). Judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 331-355.

Haarhaus, T., & Liening, A. (2020). Building dynamic capabilities to cope with environmental uncertainty: The role of strategic foresight. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 120033.

Hesselink, L. X., & Chappin, E. J. (2019). Adoption of energy efficient technologies by households–Barriers, policies and agent-based modelling studies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 99, 29-41.

Hinz, M., Lehmann, N., Aye, N., Melcher, K., Tolentino-Castro, J. W., Wagner, H., & Taubert, M. (2022). Differences in decision-making behavior between elite and amateur team-handball players in a near-game test situation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 854208.

Hoseini, S. A., Fallahpour, A., Wong, K. Y., Mahdiyar, A., Saberi, M., & Durdyev, S. (2021). Sustainable supplier selection in construction industry through hybrid fuzzy-based approaches. Sustainability, 13(3), 1413.

Hristov, I., Camilli, R., & Mechelli, A. (2022). Cognitive biases in implementing a performance management system: behavioral strategy for supporting managers’ decision-making processes. Management Research Review, 45(9), 1110-1136.

Hussain, N., Haque, A. U., & Baloch, A. (2019). Management theories: The contribution of contemporary management theorists in tackling contemporary management challenges. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 14, 156-169.

Ihalainen, L. (2021). Born Global Founder CEOs’ Intention to Early Internationalization-a qualitative study on the cognitive antecedents.

Islam, M. S., Nepal, M. P., Skitmore, M., & Kabir, G. (2019). A knowledge-based expert system to assess power plant project cost overrun risks. Expert Systems with Applications, 136, 12-32.

Jin, R., Zhong, B., Ma, L., Hashemi, A., & Ding, L. (2019). Integrating BIM with building performance analysis in project life-cycle. Automation in Construction, 106, 102861.

Jordão, A. R., Costa, R., Dias, Á. L., Pereira, L., & Santos, J. P. (2020). Bounded rationality in decision making: an analysis of the decision-making biases. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(2), 654-665.

Kaaronen, R. O., Manninen, M. A., & Eronen, J. T. (2021). Rules of thumb and cultural evolution: How simple heuristics have guided human adaptation and the emergence of cultural complexity.

Li, X., Shen, G. Q., Wu, P., & Yue, T. (2019). Integrating building information modeling and prefabrication housing production. Automation in Construction, 100, 46-60.

Liu, B., Zhou, Q., Ding, R. X., Palomares, I., & Herrera, F. (2019). Large-scale group decision making model based on social network analysis: Trust relationship-based conflict detection and elimination. European Journal of Operational Research, 275(2), 737-754.

Loftus, T. J., Tighe, P. J., Filiberto, A. C., Efron, P. A., Brakenridge, S. C., Mohr, A. M., Rashidi, P., Upchurch, G. R., & Bihorac, A. (2020). Artificial intelligence and surgical decision-making. JAMA surgery, 155(2), 148-158.

Minhas, M. R., & Potdar, V. (2020). Decision support systems in construction: A bibliometric analysis. Buildings, 10(6), 108.

Osazevbaru, H. O., & Amawhe, P. E. (2022). Emerging paradigm of employees’ involvement in decision making and organizational effectiveness: Further evidence from Nigerian Manufacturing Firms. American Journal of Economics and Business Innovation, 1(3), 14–23.

Pasaoa, K. A., Tan, J., Ong, J. I., & Trinidad, F. (2023). The Effects of Covid-19 on the Strategies of Social Enterprises in Metro Manila. American Journal of Economics and Business Innovation, 2(2), 1-16.

Rezaei, F., Bulle, C., & Lesage, P. (2019). Integrating building information modeling and life cycle assessment in the early and detailed building design stages. Building and Environment, 153, 158-167.

Sevryukova, K. S., Gorbaneva, E. P., & Mishchenko, V. Y. (2022, August). Factor systems simulation at all phases of an energy-efficient project life cycle. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 2559(1). AIP Publishing

Sorko, S. R., & Brunnhofer, M. (2019). Potentials of augmented reality in training. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 85-90.

Tan, T., Mills, G., Papadonikolaki, E., & Liu, Z. (2021). Combining multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods with building information modelling (BIM): A review. Automation in Construction, 121, 103451.

Verwer, S., & Zhang, Y. (2019, July). Learning optimal classification trees using a binary linear program formulation. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence 33(01), 1625-1632.

Yan, C., & Sviridova, T. G. (2024). Research on the Issues and Effects of Big Data on Business Economic Management. American Journal of Economics and Business Innovation, 3(1), 9-13.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-26

How to Cite

Fouda, A. (2024). Structuring the Decision-Making Process Using Quantitative Options Valuation. American Journal of Economics and Business Innovation, 3(2), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajebi.v3i2.2525